Trafficking Endangered Species
✅ 1. What is Trafficking in Endangered Species?
Trafficking in endangered species refers to the illegal trade, sale, purchase, possession, transportation, or export of animals or their parts listed as endangered under law, particularly the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (WPA) and international agreements like CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species).
This illegal trade threatens species with extinction.
It is a serious crime involving organized crime syndicates.
Includes items like ivory, tiger skins, rhino horns, bones, skins, etc.
✅ 2. Legal Framework Governing Trafficking
a) Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
Section 2(13): Defines “animal article” as any article made from animal parts.
Section 39: Animals and animal articles are government property.
Section 49B: Prohibits trade in animal articles made from Schedule I and II animals.
Section 51: Prescribes penalties, including imprisonment (3-7 years) and fines for illegal trade.
Section 53: Empowers seizure of illicit wildlife articles.
b) The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (Complementary)
Addresses cruelty during capture and transport.
c) International Law: CITES
India is a signatory to CITES, regulating international trade in endangered species.
✅ 3. Offences under the WPA Related to Trafficking
Illegal possession, transport, or sale of protected animal articles.
Smuggling across state or national borders.
Manufacturing or dealing in wildlife products without licenses.
Failure to produce valid permits on demand.
⚖️ Important Case Laws on Trafficking in Endangered Species
⚖️ 1. Wildlife Trust of India v. Union of India (2018) W.P. (C) 313 of 2018
Facts: Petitions highlighted rampant illegal trafficking of ivory and tiger parts.
Held: The Supreme Court directed stricter enforcement of wildlife trade laws, including improved coordination between enforcement agencies.
Emphasized the need for tracking and interception at borders.
Impact: Strengthened institutional measures against trafficking networks.
⚖️ 2. State of Tamil Nadu v. Raghunathan (2000) CrLJ 2982 Mad HC
Facts: Accused arrested for trafficking of ivory and tiger bones.
Held: The court emphasized that possession of wildlife articles without a valid permit under WPA is an offence, irrespective of the accused’s knowledge.
Punishment upheld to deter trafficking.
Impact: Reinforced strict liability principle for illegal possession and trade.
⚖️ 3. Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan (2012) Rajasthan HC Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 2012
Facts: Conviction of accused engaged in trafficking of rhino horns.
Held: Court imposed rigorous imprisonment and heavy fines to act as a deterrent.
Held that trafficking of rhino horns falls under Schedule I animals, deserving highest protection.
Impact: Affirmed harsh punishment in trafficking of critically endangered species.
⚖️ 4. Krishna Ramachandra Vartak v. Union of India (1987) SCC OnLine Bom 112
Facts: Illegal export of tiger skins and skins of other protected species.
Held: Court ruled that all wildlife trade without appropriate permission is illegal.
Clarified that trafficking harms national and international commitments.
Impact: Bolstered regulatory framework on export controls.
⚖️ 5. Anwar v. State of Rajasthan (2005) CrLJ 2729 Raj HC
Facts: Accused caught smuggling various wildlife products.
Held: Court imposed maximum sentence and observed that trafficking is a serious organized crime and not a mere personal offence.
Highlighted importance of intelligence-based policing.
Impact: Called for specialized enforcement against trafficking syndicates.
⚖️ 6. Union of India v. Praveen Kumar (2016) SCC OnLine Del 1547
Facts: Smuggling of elephant tusks and other wildlife parts through Delhi airport.
Held: Delhi High Court ordered strict monitoring of airports and customs.
Directed central agencies to set up task forces to curb trafficking.
Impact: Recognized critical role of transport hubs in trafficking.
⚖️ 7. Rajendra Singh Rathore v. Union of India (2013) 9 SCC 679
Facts: Illegal trade in skins and bones of Schedule I animals.
Held: The Supreme Court emphasized that trafficking offences have to be dealt with sternly to save endangered species.
Called for enhanced penalties and better inter-state coordination.
Impact: Encouraged legislative amendments to increase deterrence.
📌 Challenges in Tackling Trafficking
| Challenge | Details |
|---|---|
| Organized Crime Networks | Sophisticated syndicates with international links |
| Corruption & Enforcement Gaps | Lack of resources, training, and corruption |
| Demand for Wildlife Products | Driven by luxury markets and traditional medicine |
| Cross-Border Smuggling | Difficult to monitor porous borders |
| Weak Punishments (Historically) | Some cases ended with low penalties |
📊 Punishments Under the Wildlife Protection Act
| Offence | Imprisonment | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Trafficking in Schedule I or II species | Minimum 3 years, up to 7 years | Minimum ₹25,000, up to ₹50,000 or more |
| Repeat offence | Minimum 5 years | Minimum ₹50,000 |
| Illegal possession or trade | Up to 3 years | Fine up to ₹25,000 |
✅ Conclusion
Trafficking in endangered species is a serious offence under the Wildlife Protection Act, attracting harsh penalties.
The Indian judiciary has been consistent in interpreting the law strictly to deter offenders.
Courts have emphasized the need for strong enforcement, better intelligence gathering, and inter-agency cooperation.
The fight against trafficking is complicated by international demand, but legal tools like CITES and the WPA help regulate and curb it.
Strengthening judicial oversight and punishment, coupled with awareness, is crucial to protect India’s biodiversity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments