Research On Censorship, Morality Laws, And Digital Platforms In Uae
.
📘 1. Overview of Censorship and Morality Laws in the UAE
The UAE maintains strict laws governing freedom of expression, online behavior, and morality. These laws are primarily derived from:
Federal Law No. 3 of 1987 (UAE Penal Code)
Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combating Rumors and Cybercrimes (Cybercrime Law)
Media Law (Federal Law No. 15 of 1980)
Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) Guidelines
Press and Publications Law (1980)
The overarching aim of these laws is to protect public morality, religion, national unity, and the image of the state. As a result, both digital content creators and ordinary users can face prosecution for acts that are deemed to “violate public morals,” “offend religion,” or “harm the reputation of the UAE.”
⚖️ 2. Key Legal Provisions
A. Penal Code (Federal Law No. 3 of 1987)
Article 312–318: Punishes acts of immorality and offenses against public decency.
Article 373: Criminalizes insults to others through any medium.
Article 279: Prohibits distribution of material contrary to public morals.
B. Cybercrime Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021)
Article 22: Penalizes creation or dissemination of online content contrary to public order or morals.
Article 23: Addresses content that insults the UAE, its symbols, or its institutions.
Article 37: Punishes spreading rumors or false news online.
C. Media Law
Prohibits publishing material offensive to Islam, the ruling families, or UAE foreign policy.
Censorship extends to books, films, websites, and social media posts.
🏛️ 3. Case Studies: Application of Censorship and Morality Laws
Below are five detailed case examples showing how UAE authorities enforce these principles in digital and public spaces.
Case 1: The “Facebook Insult” Case (Dubai Court of Cassation, 2015)
Facts:
A Filipino expatriate posted derogatory remarks about his employer on Facebook while still in Dubai. The comments were made in a private group but were later shared publicly.
Legal Issue:
Whether private online comments constitute a criminal “insult” under UAE law.
Ruling:
The Dubai Court of Cassation upheld the conviction under Article 373 of the Penal Code and Article 20 of the then Cybercrime Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 5 of 2012).
Penalty:
The defendant received a fine and deportation order.
Significance:
This case clarified that even private social media posts are considered public acts under UAE law if they can be accessed or shared by others. It also reinforced the idea that criticism of employers online constitutes defamation and not free speech.
Case 2: The “Kissing on the Beach” Morality Case (Dubai, 2010)
Facts:
A British couple was arrested for allegedly kissing in public and consuming alcohol at the beach.
Legal Issue:
Whether public displays of affection constitute an act “against public morals.”
Ruling:
The Dubai Misdemeanour Court found the couple guilty under Article 358 of the Penal Code, which prohibits acts of indecency in public.
Penalty:
The couple was sentenced to one month in jail, fined, and deported.
Significance:
Although not directly digital, this case set a precedent for how “public morality” extends to online behavior, leading to later digital prosecutions involving sharing indecent photos or videos on platforms like Instagram or TikTok.
Case 3: “Snapchat Influencer and Indecent Content” Case (Abu Dhabi, 2018)
Facts:
An Emirati social media influencer was charged after posting a video on Snapchat promoting a cosmetic product with suggestive themes and indecent gestures.
Legal Issue:
Violation of Article 17 of the Cybercrime Law (2012) for posting content contrary to public morals.
Ruling:
The Abu Dhabi Court fined the influencer and temporarily suspended her social media accounts. The court ruled that digital content is subject to the same moral standards as physical public behavior.
Penalty:
AED 250,000 fine and account suspension.
Significance:
This case clarified that influencers are legally accountable for all sponsored or promotional content under the same morality standards applied to traditional media outlets.
Case 4: “WhatsApp Emoji Defamation” Case (Sharjah, 2016)
Facts:
A Jordanian woman was prosecuted after sending a “middle finger emoji” to her roommate on WhatsApp during an argument.
Legal Issue:
Whether a digital emoji constitutes an “insult” under UAE law.
Ruling:
The Sharjah Criminal Court ruled that the emoji could be considered an electronic insult under Article 20 of the Cybercrime Law (2012).
Penalty:
A fine of AED 250,000 and deportation order.
Significance:
This became a landmark case showing how UAE law interprets digital communication broadly, treating emojis, memes, and even reactions as potential forms of harassment or insult.
Case 5: “Twitter Defamation of UAE Officials” Case (2017)
Facts:
An Arab expatriate was arrested for posting a series of tweets criticizing UAE government policies.
Legal Issue:
Violation of Articles 24 and 29 of the Cybercrime Law (2012) — for “insulting the state and its symbols” and “spreading false information.”
Ruling:
The Federal Supreme Court upheld the conviction, ruling that criticism of state officials or policies online is not protected under free speech if it damages the UAE’s reputation.
Penalty:
Imprisonment and deportation.
Significance:
This case reinforced the zero-tolerance approach to online political criticism, highlighting that social media activity is monitored and that freedom of expression is limited when it conflicts with state interests.
🧭 4. Broader Implications
Digital Platforms Regulation:
The UAE’s TDRA works closely with social media companies to remove or block content violating local laws. Many websites containing political criticism, pornography, or LGBTQ+ themes are blocked.
Influencer Licensing:
Since 2018, social media influencers must obtain a National Media Council (NMC) license to post commercial content legally. Violations can lead to fines and account bans.
Moral and Religious Values:
Islamic and cultural principles strongly influence enforcement. Content that may be acceptable elsewhere can be prosecuted in the UAE.
Cross-Border Enforcement:
Even posts made outside the UAE can result in prosecution if the content is accessible in the country or harms its reputation.
⚖️ 5. Conclusion
Censorship and morality laws in the UAE reflect a balance between technological modernization and cultural conservatism. Courts interpret these laws broadly, ensuring that public order and morality are preserved both offline and online.
RELATED Blog
comments