Identity Theft And Online Impersonation
Identity Theft and Online Impersonation: Overview
Identity theft and online impersonation are cybercrimes where an individual fraudulently assumes another person’s identity, typically for financial gain, defamation, or illegal access.
Key Legal Provisions (India)
Indian Penal Code (IPC):
Section 419: Punishment for cheating by personation.
Section 420: Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.
Section 465–471: Forgery, including digital documents.
Section 66C of IT Act 2000: Identity theft via electronic means.
Section 66D of IT Act 2000: Cheating by impersonation using electronic communication.
Essential Elements:
Fraudulent use of another person’s identity.
Intent to deceive, cheat, or cause harm.
Misrepresentation in digital or physical form.
Detailed Case Laws
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004)
Facts: Suhas Katti sent obscene emails to a woman using her friend’s identity.
Legal Issue: Whether sending emails in someone else’s name amounts to criminal impersonation.
Judgment: Court held that using another person’s identity online to defame or harm them constitutes identity theft and cheating under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section 66D.
Significance: Landmark case recognizing online impersonation as a criminal offence in India.
2. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) (Relevant to online impersonation context)
Facts: Case primarily about Section 66A of IT Act but discussed online misrepresentation.
Legal Issue: Can online speech and impersonation be restricted?
Judgment: Supreme Court emphasized protection of digital identity, and misuse of digital identity falls under cheating and criminal liability.
Significance: Strengthened digital identity protection and clarified limits of free speech versus impersonation.
3. K. V. S. Murthy v. State (2010)
Facts: Accused hacked email accounts and sent fraudulent financial requests impersonating the victims.
Legal Issue: Whether hacking and impersonation constitutes both identity theft and cheating.
Judgment: Court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 420, 465, and IT Act Section 66C, noting that intent to defraud and gain was evident.
Significance: Recognized hacking plus impersonation as a compound cybercrime.
4. State of Maharashtra v. Rohit Jadhav (2012)
Facts: The accused created fake social media accounts to defame a person and obtain confidential information.
Legal Issue: Is social media impersonation criminal?
Judgment: Court held that misrepresentation online, leading to defamation or breach of privacy, is punishable under IPC Sections 463, 468, 469, and IT Act Section 66D.
Significance: Social media impersonation is legally actionable, especially when privacy or reputation is harmed.
5. CBI v. Ramesh Kumar (2015)
Facts: The accused stole someone’s PAN and bank details to open multiple fake accounts.
Legal Issue: Whether fraudulent use of personal data without consent amounts to identity theft.
Judgment: Court convicted under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, and IT Act Section 66C, emphasizing identity theft includes financial fraud.
Significance: Shows identity theft can be purely financial without physical interaction.
6. State v. Ankit Gupta (2017)
Facts: Impersonated a government official online to extract bribes from citizens.
Legal Issue: Does impersonation of a public official online constitute criminal offence?
Judgment: Court convicted under IPC Sections 170 (personation of public servant), 420, and IT Act Section 66D.
Significance: Online impersonation of officials is treated equally serious as offline personation.
7. R v. Shailendra Yadav (2019)
Facts: Created multiple fake WhatsApp accounts to harass and threaten victims.
Legal Issue: Whether online harassment through impersonation can be prosecuted.
Judgment: Court held that identity theft used for harassment or intimidation falls under IPC Sections 354D, 507, 509 and IT Act Sections 66C/66D.
Significance: Online impersonation with criminal intent covers harassment, intimidation, and stalking.
Key Takeaways
Identity theft includes financial fraud, defamation, harassment, and hacking.
Online impersonation is criminal whether through email, social media, or instant messaging.
Offences attract combined IPC and IT Act penalties.
Intent to harm, cheat, or defraud is critical for prosecution.
Indian courts treat online impersonation as seriously as offline personation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments