Landmark Judgments On Victim Compensation Programs
1. State of Punjab v. Ramdev Singh, AIR 1964 SC 72
Context:
One of the earliest cases where the Supreme Court emphasized the need to consider victim compensation as part of justice delivery.
Facts:
The accused was convicted of causing grievous hurt. The Court was asked to decide whether the victim or the victim’s family could be compensated by the offender or the state.
Judgment:
The Court held that the state has a duty to ensure justice includes relief to victims, not only punishing offenders. It stated that compensation can be awarded under Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to provide restitution to victims.
Significance:
This judgment laid the foundation for recognizing compensation as integral to criminal justice, and not merely the offender’s punishment.
2. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610
Context:
Although primarily a case on custodial rights, this ruling indirectly influenced victim compensation jurisprudence by emphasizing state responsibility for protection and relief to victims of state excesses.
Facts:
The petitioner sought guidelines to prevent custodial torture and ensure victim protection.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court laid down detailed safeguards and guidelines to prevent police abuses and ordered compensation for victims of custodial violence, holding the state accountable for compensating victims.
Significance:
This case reinforced the principle that victims of crime and state abuse are entitled to compensation, and courts have the power to direct payment from the state treasury.
3. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 1086 (Oleum Gas Leak Case)
Context:
A landmark environmental law case that expanded victim compensation principles to include compensation for environmental and public harm.
Facts:
Due to the gas leak from a chemical plant, thousands were injured or died. The victims sought compensation from the polluter.
Judgment:
The Court ruled that under the principle of “absolute liability”, the polluter must compensate victims for harm caused, irrespective of negligence.
Significance:
This judgment broadened the scope of compensation programs to cover mass disasters and environmental harm, laying the groundwork for victim compensation beyond traditional crimes.
4. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604
Context:
This case articulated the state’s obligation to create victim compensation schemes.
Facts:
The petitioner challenged delays in the implementation of compensation to victims of crime.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court directed states to frame and implement victim compensation schemes, acknowledging that many victims suffer due to delays and inadequacies in relief.
Significance:
This ruling explicitly mandated the institutionalization of victim compensation programs by state governments, prompting the enactment of statutory schemes.
5. Laxmi v. Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 536 (Acid Attack Case)
Context:
A pivotal case recognizing the right of victims to compensation as part of their fundamental rights under the Constitution.
Facts:
Laxmi, a victim of an acid attack, sought compensation and rehabilitation from the state.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that victim compensation is a constitutional obligation, tied to the right to life and dignity under Article 21. The Court ordered the state to provide timely and adequate compensation, medical treatment, and rehabilitation.
Significance:
This judgment firmly entrenched victim compensation as a fundamental right and expanded state responsibility for comprehensive relief.
Summary of Legal Principles:
| Case | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|
| State of Punjab v. Ramdev Singh | Compensation is integral to justice and can be awarded under CrPC. |
| D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal | State must protect and compensate victims of state abuse. |
| M.C. Mehta v. Union of India | Polluters bear absolute liability to compensate victims of environmental harm. |
| State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal | States must establish formal victim compensation schemes. |
| Laxmi v. Union of India | Victim compensation is a fundamental right under Article 21. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments