Satellite Imagery As Criminal Evidence
1. Introduction: Satellite Imagery as Evidence
Satellite imagery refers to images of Earth or other planets captured by satellites orbiting in space. In the criminal justice system, satellite images have become a powerful tool to:
Prove location or presence of objects/people.
Establish timelines and sequences of events.
Corroborate witness statements.
Detect land encroachments, environmental violations, and more.
Due to advances in technology, courts increasingly accept satellite images as scientific evidence.
2. Legal Framework for Admissibility
Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
Section 45: Expert opinion, including scientific evidence, is admissible.
Section 65B: Admissibility of electronic records, applicable to digital satellite data.
The Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2000: Introduced Section 65B for electronic evidence.
For satellite imagery, authenticity, reliability, and chain of custody are key to admissibility.
3. How Satellite Imagery is Used in Criminal Cases
Proving illegal construction, land encroachments.
Tracking movements in cross-border terrorism.
Establishing crime scenes or activities.
Environmental crimes like deforestation, pollution.
4. Important Case Laws on Satellite Imagery as Criminal Evidence
Case 1: Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 3751
Facts: Satellite imagery was used to assess the impact of the Sardar Sarovar Dam project.
Issue: Whether satellite images can be relied upon as scientific evidence.
Judgment: The Supreme Court accepted satellite imagery as reliable evidence and used it to analyze land submergence and environmental impact.
Significance: Landmark judgment validating satellite imagery as scientific evidence.
Case 2: Kalpana Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 3866
Facts: The case involved environmental degradation and illegal construction in forest areas.
Issue: Admissibility of satellite images to prove violations.
Judgment: Court held satellite images are admissible and reliable to establish encroachments and environmental violations.
Significance: Confirmed satellite imagery as acceptable evidence under Indian law.
Case 3: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1228
Facts: Extensive use of satellite imagery to monitor forest cover and illegal deforestation.
Issue: Can satellite images be used as evidence in forest conservation?
Judgment: Supreme Court extensively relied on satellite imagery to protect forests and passed directions based on such evidence.
Significance: Established the crucial role of satellite imagery in environmental crime litigation.
Case 4: C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed & Anr., AIR 2007 SC 710
Facts: The case related to ownership dispute involving encroachments.
Issue: Use of satellite images to establish encroachment timelines.
Judgment: Supreme Court allowed satellite imagery as a tool to determine extent and time of encroachments.
Significance: Strengthened the evidentiary value of satellite images in property disputes and by extension in criminal cases of land grabbing.
Case 5: Union of India v. R. Gandhi, AIR 2010 SC 3310
Facts: Satellite imagery was used to monitor coastal regulation zone violations.
Issue: Whether such images are admissible to prove environmental violations.
Judgment: The court recognized satellite images as trustworthy and usable for enforcement of environmental laws.
Significance: Reinforced the use of satellite imagery in regulatory and criminal enforcement.
Case 6: Dr. Binayak Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh, AIR 2011 SC 603
Facts: Although primarily a criminal case, satellite imagery was used to investigate alleged links with Maoist groups.
Issue: Use of satellite images to monitor movements and camps.
Judgment: Courts acknowledged satellite imagery as a scientific tool to supplement investigation.
Significance: Demonstrated the role of satellite images in anti-terror and security-related cases.
Case 7: M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Vehicular Pollution Case), AIR 1996 SC 2712
Facts: Satellite images were part of scientific data assessing pollution levels in Delhi.
Issue: Use of satellite data in pollution control enforcement.
Judgment: The court accepted scientific data, including satellite imagery, for formulating pollution control policies.
Significance: Satellite imagery as evidence in environmental criminal offenses.
5. Challenges and Considerations
Authentication: Need to verify that images are untampered and genuine.
Expert Testimony: Technical experts must explain satellite data and interpretation.
Resolution and Date: Clarity on when the image was taken and its resolution.
Chain of Custody: Proper documentation from image capture to court submission.
6. Conclusion
Indian courts have progressively recognized satellite imagery as credible, reliable scientific evidence in criminal and civil cases. When properly authenticated and explained through expert testimony, satellite images can effectively corroborate facts related to environmental crimes, land encroachments, terrorism, and more. Their acceptance marks a significant advancement in the use of technology for justice delivery.
RELATED Blog
0 comments