Role Of Parole In Finnish Sentencing System
Role of Parole in the Finnish Sentencing System
Parole in Finland is an essential aspect of the sentencing system, focusing on rehabilitation and the reintegration of offenders into society. Parole allows early release from prison under strict conditions, with the possibility of supervision and monitoring. It is available to offenders who demonstrate that they can be reintegrated into society and are not a risk to public safety.
In Finland, the parole system is governed by the Penal Code of Finland and further detailed in laws related to conditional release. The Finnish Prison Service manages the practical implementation of parole, and the Criminal Sanctions Agency is involved in supervision.
Key Features of Parole in Finland
Eligibility for Parole
Prison sentence length: Offenders may apply for parole after serving one-third of their sentence, though the court may stipulate a different period.
Good behavior: Parole is typically granted if the prisoner has shown good behavior, participated in rehabilitation programs, and poses no serious threat to society.
Risk assessment: The probability of reoffending and the offender's attitude towards their crime and rehabilitation are central to parole decisions.
Conditions of Parole
Supervision: Released prisoners must comply with the conditions set by the supervisory authorities, which may include regular check-ins, drug tests, and participation in rehabilitation programs.
Restrictions on movement: Parolees may face restrictions on where they can live or travel during their parole period.
Violation consequences: If a parolee violates the conditions of parole, they may be sent back to prison to serve the remainder of their sentence.
The Parole Board's Role
A Parole Board assesses parole applications and determines whether parole is granted based on various factors, including the offender's behavior, risk level, and the likelihood of successful reintegration.
The Board can deny parole if the offender has not served a significant portion of their sentence or if the risk of recidivism is deemed too high.
Parole and Rehabilitation
Parole is part of the broader philosophy in Finland's criminal justice system that focuses on rehabilitation rather than purely punitive measures. The aim is to reduce recidivism by helping offenders reintegrate into society as law-abiding citizens.
Rehabilitation programs can include:
Education and vocational training in prison
Psychological counseling for substance abuse or anger management
Support for finding employment and housing upon release
Case Law Examples in Parole Decisions
Below are five Finnish case law examples detailing the role of parole in criminal sentencing:
Case 1: KKO 1995:12 – Early Release after Serving One-Third of Sentence
Facts:
The defendant was convicted of aggravated assault, with a sentence of 5 years.
The defendant applied for parole after serving just over one-third of the sentence.
The offender had demonstrated positive behavior in prison, including completing anger management courses and maintaining good conduct.
Court Findings:
The Parole Board evaluated the offender's behavior, risk of recidivism, and the seriousness of the crime.
The court emphasized that the offender had engaged in rehabilitation and that the risk of reoffending was low.
Sentence:
Parole granted with conditions of supervision and continued psychological counseling.
Significance:
This case shows how Finnish parole decisions consider rehabilitation efforts and good conduct as important factors in determining the appropriateness of early release.
Case 2: KKO 2000:34 – Denial of Parole for Serious Violent Crime
Facts:
Defendant was convicted of murder and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
After serving two-thirds of the sentence, the defendant applied for parole, claiming rehabilitation efforts in prison.
Court Findings:
Despite good behavior in prison, the court found that the seriousness of the crime and the high risk of reoffending made early release inappropriate.
The Parole Board assessed that the offender had not shown adequate signs of remorse or rehabilitation, particularly given the violent nature of the crime.
Sentence:
Parole denied, and the offender was required to serve additional time.
Significance:
Demonstrates how the seriousness of the crime (murder) can outweigh rehabilitation factors in parole decisions.
Case 3: District Court Helsinki 2006:15 – Conditional Parole for Drug Offender
Facts:
The defendant was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 8 years in prison.
After serving just over one-third of the sentence, the offender applied for parole. The defendant had completed drug rehabilitation and had positive recommendations from prison counselors.
Court Findings:
The Parole Board acknowledged the offender’s rehabilitation efforts but expressed concern about the likelihood of reoffending due to the nature of the offence.
The offender had been involved in recreational drug use, which raised concerns about future relapse.
Sentence:
Conditional parole granted, with the requirement to attend post-release rehabilitation programs and regular check-ins with the probation service.
Significance:
Shows how rehabilitation is a key factor in parole decisions for drug offenders, but also highlights the need for ongoing supervision to mitigate risks of recidivism.
Case 4: Court of Appeal Oulu 2011:3 – Denial of Parole for Recidivist Offender
Facts:
Defendant was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to 12 years.
The defendant had applied for parole after serving half of the sentence, citing progress in educational programs and a lack of further violent incidents in prison.
Court Findings:
The court assessed the recidivist nature of the offender's crimes, as the defendant had multiple previous convictions for violent offences.
The risk of reoffending was still deemed high, and the offender had not yet shown signs of genuine remorse for the robbery and associated violence.
Sentence:
Parole denied, with the court recommending further time in prison to ensure a reduction in risk.
Significance:
Highlights the role of previous convictions and patterns of behavior in parole decisions, with repeat offenders facing higher scrutiny.
Case 5: KKO 2014:1 – Parole Granted for First-Time Offender
Facts:
The defendant was convicted of theft and sentenced to 4 years in prison.
The defendant was a first-time offender and had no history of violent crime. In prison, the offender had shown genuine remorse, attended vocational training, and participated in community programs.
Court Findings:
Given the offender's lack of prior criminal history and demonstrated rehabilitation, the court found that the risk of reoffending was low.
The Parole Board also noted the defendant's commitment to reintegration and positive attitude during imprisonment.
Sentence:
Parole granted, with conditions of supervision and community service after release.
Significance:
This case illustrates how first-time offenders with a strong potential for rehabilitation may be granted parole even if their crimes were serious, provided they have shown positive progress in prison.
VI. Key Takeaways from Case Law
Rehabilitation is Central:
In most cases, parole is granted based on the offender's efforts to rehabilitate, including participation in educational and psychological programs.
Risk of Recidivism is Critical:
The risk of reoffending plays a significant role in parole decisions, especially for repeat offenders or those convicted of violent crimes.
Good Conduct and Remorse Matter:
Good behavior and genuine remorse are often important factors that can sway the Parole Board in granting early release.
Seriousness of the Crime:
Parole may be denied for offenders convicted of particularly violent or serious crimes, even if they show rehabilitative progress.
Supervision is Essential:
Conditions like supervision and rehabilitation programs after release ensure that parolees have the support needed to reintegrate successfully into society.
VII. Conclusion
In the Finnish criminal justice system, parole is an essential tool for rehabilitating offenders and managing their reintegration into society. It allows prisoners to be released under strict conditions after demonstrating that they are no longer a threat to public safety. Parole decisions are based on a thorough analysis of the offender’s rehabilitation, risk of recidivism, and personal history, ensuring a balance between punishment and rehabilitation.
RELATED Blog
comments