Organized Crime Prosecutions In Usa
Organized Crime Prosecutions in the USA: Overview
RICO Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968): Enables prosecutors to charge individuals or groups who engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Other relevant statutes: Money laundering laws, conspiracy statutes, narcotics laws, and state criminal statutes.
Case 1: United States v. Gambino Crime Family (1992)
Facts:
The Gambino family, one of the infamous Five Families in New York City, was prosecuted for racketeering, murder, extortion, loan sharking, and narcotics trafficking.
Charges:
Violations under RICO.
Murder conspiracy.
Extortion and illegal gambling.
Outcome:
John Gotti, the boss, was convicted of racketeering and murder conspiracy.
Sentenced to life imprisonment.
Several high-ranking members were also convicted.
Legal Significance:
Showcased the power of RICO to bring down major Mafia families.
Demonstrated use of witness protection programs (e.g., Sammy Gravano turned government witness).
Case 2: United States v. Medellín Drug Cartel (2009)
Facts:
This prosecution targeted a large international drug trafficking organization based in Colombia with extensive operations in the U.S.
Charges:
Drug trafficking conspiracy.
Money laundering.
Firearms violations.
Outcome:
Leaders and operatives were sentenced to long prison terms.
Assets seized worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
Legal Significance:
Highlighted the international scope of organized crime and U.S. collaboration with foreign law enforcement.
Strengthened enforcement of drug laws against cartels.
Case 3: United States v. Chicago Outfit (Operation Family Secrets, 2007)
Facts:
An extensive federal probe into Chicago’s organized crime syndicate uncovered numerous murders, extortion, and other criminal enterprises.
Charges:
Racketeering under RICO.
Murder and conspiracy.
Extortion and loan sharking.
Outcome:
Several key figures convicted, including reputed boss Joseph Lombardo.
Life sentences and lengthy prison terms imposed.
Legal Significance:
Landmark case revealing decades of violent crime by the Chicago Outfit.
Showed effectiveness of long-term investigations and cooperation by former insiders.
Case 4: United States v. DeCavalcante Crime Family (2005)
Facts:
The DeCavalcante family, sometimes called the inspiration for The Sopranos, faced federal prosecution for various criminal rackets.
Charges:
RICO violations.
Extortion.
Illegal gambling.
Outcome:
Multiple convictions including the acting boss.
Significant disruption to the family’s operations.
Legal Significance:
Demonstrated the reach of federal law into smaller but persistent organized crime groups.
Reinforced importance of RICO in dismantling criminal enterprises.
Case 5: United States v. Los Zetas (2013)
Facts:
Los Zetas, a violent Mexican cartel with significant U.S. operations, were prosecuted for drug trafficking, kidnapping, and murder.
Charges:
Drug trafficking conspiracy.
Racketeering.
Violent crimes including murder.
Outcome:
Key leaders arrested and convicted in the U.S.
Large-scale seizures of drugs and weapons.
Legal Significance:
Highlighted U.S. efforts to combat transnational organized crime groups.
Used RICO statutes to charge cartel members inside U.S. jurisdiction.
Case 6: United States v. Hells Angels Motorcycle Club (2007)
Facts:
Federal prosecutors charged members of the Hells Angels, a notorious motorcycle club, with racketeering and violent crimes including drug distribution and murder.
Charges:
RICO violations.
Drug trafficking.
Murder conspiracy.
Outcome:
Multiple convictions and sentences ranging from years to life.
Disruption of club’s illegal enterprises.
Legal Significance:
Showed that non-Mafia organized crime groups are prosecutable under RICO.
Marked one of the largest law enforcement actions against motorcycle gangs.
Case 7: United States v. The Lucchese Crime Family (2010)
Facts:
Federal investigation into the Lucchese family uncovered racketeering including extortion, loan sharking, and murder.
Charges:
Racketeering under RICO.
Conspiracy to commit murder.
Extortion and narcotics trafficking.
Outcome:
Convictions of several leaders, including life sentences.
Seizure of assets and disruption of operations.
Legal Significance:
Part of a series of prosecutions that crippled traditional Mafia families in NYC.
Demonstrated coordinated law enforcement efforts.
Summary Table
| Case | Charges | Outcome | Legal Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. v. Gambino Family (1992) | RICO, murder, extortion | Life sentences for leaders | Landmark Mafia prosecution |
| U.S. v. Medellín Cartel (2009) | Drug trafficking, money laundering | Long prison terms, asset seizures | International cartel enforcement |
| U.S. v. Chicago Outfit (2007) | RICO, murder, extortion | Life sentences, convictions | Exposed decades-long organized crime |
| U.S. v. DeCavalcante Family (2005) | RICO, extortion, gambling | Multiple convictions | Federal reach into smaller groups |
| U.S. v. Los Zetas (2013) | Drug trafficking, racketeering | Leader arrests and convictions | Transnational organized crime |
| U.S. v. Hells Angels (2007) | RICO, drug trafficking, murder | Multiple convictions | Prosecuting outlaw motorcycle gangs |
| U.S. v. Lucchese Family (2010) | RICO, murder conspiracy, extortion | Life sentences for leaders | Continued Mafia family crackdowns |
Key Legal Takeaways
RICO Act remains the cornerstone for prosecuting organized crime, allowing leaders to be held accountable for crimes committed by associates.
Prosecutions often rely heavily on informant testimony and wiretaps.
Organized crime today includes traditional Mafia families, motorcycle gangs, and transnational cartels.
Federal and state law enforcement agencies collaborate extensively.
Sentences are often severe, including life imprisonment and massive asset forfeitures.
These cases have helped reduce violent crime and illegal enterprise influence in many regions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments