Prosecution Of Illegal Ivory Trade Via Chinese Ports
Overview
China has historically been a major hub for ivory trade. Domestic ivory trade was banned in 2017, and any illegal import, export, or possession of ivory is now strictly criminalized under:
Wildlife Protection Law of China
Criminal Law of China, Articles 341 & 151 (smuggling, trafficking endangered species)
Customs Law (illegal import/export)
Prosecutions focus on illegal smuggling through ports, distribution, and trading of ivory products.
Case 1: Shenzhen Port Seizure (2014)
Facts:
Customs officials seized 3,000 elephant tusks hidden in shipping containers from Africa.
The tusks were destined for local markets in southern China.
Legal Issues:
Smuggling endangered species.
Violation of Wildlife Protection Law.
Court Outcome:
The smuggling ring’s leader sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.
5 accomplices received 6–10 years imprisonment.
Confiscation of all ivory and equipment used in trafficking.
Significance:
Highlighted the role of Chinese ports as major transit points.
Demonstrated the application of strict criminal penalties before the domestic ivory ban.
Case 2: Guangzhou Customs Ivory Bust (2015)
Facts:
Customs intercepted a shipment of over 2,500 kg of raw ivory from Tanzania.
The shipment had falsified documents claiming the cargo was timber.
Legal Issues:
Smuggling and falsification of customs documents.
Trafficking in endangered species.
Court Outcome:
Organizers sentenced to 10–15 years imprisonment.
Co-conspirators received 5–8 years.
Heavy fines imposed, and the shipping company penalized.
Significance:
Showed the increasing sophistication of smuggling operations.
Reinforced that forgery and concealment cannot shield offenders from criminal liability.
Case 3: Shanghai Port Ivory Smuggling Ring (2016)
Facts:
Authorities uncovered a syndicate attempting to smuggle over 1,500 ivory carvings from Africa.
The carvings were intended for the black market in China.
Legal Issues:
Illegal import and sale of ivory.
Violation of wildlife protection and customs law.
Court Outcome:
Head of the syndicate sentenced to 14 years imprisonment.
7 members received 6–10 years.
Seizure of assets and ivory products.
Significance:
Demonstrated the judiciary’s commitment to cracking down on illegal ivory trade ahead of the 2017 domestic ban.
Showed that both physical ivory and finished products are criminalized.
Case 4: Ningbo Port Ivory Smuggling Case (2017)
Facts:
Shortly after the domestic ivory ban, Ningbo customs seized over 800 kg of raw ivory hidden in shipments labeled as “plastic goods.”
Legal Issues:
Smuggling endangered species post-ban.
Attempted evasion of customs inspection.
Court Outcome:
Organizers sentenced to 8–12 years imprisonment.
Fines imposed on the company involved.
Significance:
Marked the enforcement of new legal standards after the ivory ban.
Reinforced zero tolerance for illegal ivory import after domestic sales ended.
Case 5: Beijing Customs Ivory Carving Ring (2018)
Facts:
A syndicate was caught importing ivory carvings via multiple ports, intending to sell them to collectors.
They used fake certificates and shell companies to evade detection.
Legal Issues:
Illegal import, possession, and intended sale of ivory.
Use of fraudulent documentation.
Court Outcome:
Leaders sentenced to 10–15 years imprisonment.
Accomplices received 5–9 years.
Confiscation of all ivory and seizure of bank accounts.
Significance:
Showed that enforcement extended beyond southern ports to major northern cities.
Illustrated the judiciary’s ability to trace and prosecute complex smuggling networks.
Case 6: Xiamen Port Ivory Smuggling (2019)
Facts:
Customs intercepted 1,200 kg of raw ivory tusks concealed inside machinery.
The shipment originated from Central Africa and was bound for multiple buyers in China.
Legal Issues:
Smuggling endangered species.
Criminal conspiracy and use of intermediaries to evade law enforcement.
Court Outcome:
Syndicate leader received 13 years imprisonment.
Three co-conspirators received 7–10 years.
Assets, vehicles, and ivory destroyed or confiscated.
Significance:
Reinforced that all ports, including smaller ones, are under strict surveillance.
Illustrated the trend toward heavy sentencing and asset seizure for ivory smuggling.
Key Legal Principles Across Cases
Criminal liability is strict: Both organizers and accomplices face long-term imprisonment.
Smuggling methods are irrelevant: Hiding ivory in machinery, cargo, or mislabeled goods does not exempt liability.
Asset seizure and fines are standard: To prevent profit from crime.
Domestic ivory ban enforcement is severe: Post-2017, even small-scale imports are treated harshly.
Syndicate leaders bear the heaviest penalties: Leadership role in organizing smuggling is heavily punished.
These six cases illustrate China’s robust prosecution framework for illegal ivory trade, emphasizing port enforcement, long prison sentences, and financial penalties.
RELATED Blog
comments