Dna Paternity Evidence In Rape Trials
π 1. Introduction to DNA Evidence in Rape Trials
In rape trials, DNA paternity testing plays a crucial role when:
The victim becomes pregnant as a result of the rape,
There is a dispute over the identity of the accused,
The paternity of the child is relevant to establishing rape and sexual intercourse.
DNA evidence can confirm whether the accused is biologically related to the child, thereby helping the court to determine if sexual intercourse occurred, and whether consent was present or absent, depending on the context.
βοΈ 2. Legal Provisions Related to DNA Evidence
π Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 45 β Opinion of experts (includes DNA experts).
Section 112 β Presumption of legitimacy of a child born during marriage (important when married women allege rape).
Section 65B β Admissibility of electronic records (used for lab reports and DNA test data).
π Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973
Section 53A β Medical examination of an accused in rape cases (includes DNA sampling).
Section 164A β Medical examination of the rape victim.
π Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
In civil paternity disputes, courts apply Section 112 presumption more strictly. But in criminal rape cases, DNA often trumps presumptions.
𧬠3. How DNA Paternity Evidence Is Used in Rape Cases
Positive match: If DNA of the accused matches the child, it is strong evidence that he had sexual intercourse with the victim.
Negative match: If no match, it weakens the prosecution case, unless there are multiple accused or delayed reporting.
DNA helps in excluding innocent accused and strengthening victim testimony.
βοΈ 4. Landmark Case Laws on DNA Paternity in Rape Trials
β 1. Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik v. Lata Nandlal Badwaik (2014) 2 SCC 576
Facts:
In a marital dispute, the husband denied paternity of the child. A DNA test showed he was not the biological father. The wife claimed the child was born from the marriage.
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled that DNA evidence overrides the presumption under Section 112, and courts must accept scientific truth over legal fiction.
Significance:
Though a civil matter, the case became important precedent in rape cases for prioritizing DNA evidence over presumptions of legitimacy.
β 2. Banarsi Dass v. Teeku Dutta (2005) 4 SCC 449
Facts:
A dispute over whether the child born was from a legitimate relationship. The court considered whether DNA testing could be compelled.
Held:
SC held that DNA testing must balance privacy and dignity, and cannot be ordered lightly.
Significance:
Reaffirmed that consent and dignity must be respected, particularly in sensitive rape cases, but DNA can be allowed if it serves justice.
β 3. Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010) 7 SCC 263
Facts:
The issue was whether involuntary medical tests (like narco-analysis, brain mapping, or DNA collection) violate Article 20(3) (self-incrimination).
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled that DNA tests do not violate Article 20(3) as they are physical evidence, not testimonial compulsion.
Significance:
Made it clear that accused can be compelled to undergo DNA testing in rape cases without violating constitutional rights.
β 4. State of Gujarat v. Dhruv Gajendra Patel (Gujarat HC, 2020)
Facts:
A minor rape survivor gave birth to a child. DNA report showed the accused was the biological father.
Held:
The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act, relying heavily on DNA paternity evidence.
Significance:
Shows how DNA paternity testing can be decisive in confirming rape where pregnancy occurs.
β 5. Ravindra v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Madhya Pradesh HC, 2018)
Facts:
Accused challenged DNA test results that proved he fathered a child from a rape.
Held:
Court upheld the DNA results and held that positive DNA match proves sexual act, and victimβs testimony was trustworthy.
Significance:
Reinforced that DNA plus victim testimony is often conclusive evidence in rape trials involving pregnancy.
β 6. Goutam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418
Facts:
A husband denied paternity and sought DNA testing.
Held:
Court held that DNA testing should not be ordered as a routine and must respect the dignity of the woman.
Significance:
Early judgment that has since evolved β modern courts now allow DNA testing more freely in rape cases to ensure justice.
π§ 5. Legal Principles Emerging from Case Law
| Principle | Explanation | Case Law |
|---|---|---|
| DNA overrides legal presumptions | Scientific truth > Legal fiction | Nandlal Badwaik |
| DNA evidence is admissible | Under Section 45 Evidence Act | Ravindra v. MP |
| Accused can be compelled for DNA test | No violation of Article 20(3) | Selvi v. Karnataka |
| Victimβs privacy must be respected | Especially in unmarried pregnancy | Goutam Kundu |
| DNA alone can convict | If corroborated by victim's statement | State of Gujarat v. Dhruv Patel |
π 6. Challenges and Considerations
β Admissibility:
Requires proper chain of custody, certification under Section 65B, and expert testimony.
β Delay in Testing:
DNA must be collected promptly, else risk of degradation.
β Consent of the Victim:
Especially in minor or mentally challenged victims, courts need to ensure ethical procedures.
β False Allegations:
DNA helps exonerate the falsely accused in rape cases.
π 7. Conclusion
DNA paternity evidence in rape trials is now widely accepted, admissible, and often decisive. Courts in India have recognized its importance in:
Confirming sexual intercourse in disputed cases,
Establishing paternity in cases involving pregnancy,
Protecting the innocent from false charges.
The jurisprudence balances scientific advancement with human dignity and privacy, especially of the victim. When properly collected and corroborated, DNA evidence is among the most reliable tools in rape prosecutions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments