Police Accountability And Reform
Police Accountability and Reform
Police accountability refers to the mechanisms, processes, and policies that hold law enforcement officers responsible for their actions, especially when those actions violate laws, regulations, or ethical standards. It includes both internal oversight (within police departments) and external oversight (judicial review, civilian review boards, legislation).
Police reform is the effort to improve policing by changing policies, training, culture, and accountability mechanisms to reduce misconduct and enhance public trust.
Key Aspects of Police Accountability
Use of force regulations
Internal disciplinary procedures
Civilian oversight commissions
Transparency and body cameras
Legal remedies (civil suits, criminal prosecutions)
Training and cultural change
Important Cases in Police Accountability and Reform
Case 1: Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
Issue: Use of Deadly Force
Jurisdiction: United States Supreme Court
Facts:
In 1974, police in Tennessee shot and killed Edward Garner, an unarmed 15-year-old suspect fleeing the scene of a burglary. The police officer shot Garner in the back as he ran away, claiming it was to prevent his escape.
Legal Question:
Is it constitutional for police to use deadly force to prevent the escape of an unarmed fleeing suspect?
Holding:
The U.S. Supreme Court held that deadly force may not be used unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
Impact:
Established a constitutional standard limiting the use of deadly force.
Led to widespread police reforms in use-of-force policies across the U.S.
Highlighted the importance of balancing public safety with individual rights.
Case 2: Graham v. Connor (1989)
Issue: Use of Force and “Objective Reasonableness” Standard
Jurisdiction: United States Supreme Court
Facts:
Daryl Graham, a diabetic, was briefly detained by police after exhibiting unusual behavior. During the encounter, police used force, causing injuries. Graham sued, alleging excessive force.
Legal Question:
What is the standard for judging claims of excessive force by police under the Fourth Amendment?
Holding:
The Supreme Court ruled that claims of excessive force must be analyzed under the “objective reasonableness” standard — whether the officer’s actions are objectively reasonable in light of the facts and circumstances without regard to the officer's intent.
Impact:
Created the “objective reasonableness” framework for evaluating police use of force.
Courts must consider the situation from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene.
This standard is widely used today but has been criticized for being too deferential to officers.
Case 3: Monell v. Department of Social Services (1978)
Issue: Municipal Liability for Police Misconduct
Jurisdiction: United States Supreme Court
Facts:
Plaintiffs sued the City of New York for unconstitutional actions by city employees, including police officers, alleging policies or customs led to violations of constitutional rights.
Legal Question:
Can a municipality (city or county) be held liable under Section 1983 for violations of constitutional rights by its employees?
Holding:
The Court held that municipalities can be sued under Section 1983 when the unconstitutional action results from official policies, practices, or customs.
Impact:
Allowed victims of police misconduct to sue cities, not just individual officers.
Encouraged municipal governments to implement reforms to avoid liability.
Helped promote systemic police reform rather than isolated discipline.
Case 4: Floyd v. City of New York (2013)
Issue: Stop-and-Frisk Policy and Racial Profiling
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Facts:
The New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) sued the NYPD, challenging the city’s stop-and-frisk policy, alleging it violated constitutional rights by disproportionately targeting minority communities without reasonable suspicion.
Legal Question:
Did the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk practices violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Holding:
The court ruled the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy violated the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable searches and seizures) and Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) because it involved racial profiling and lacked reasonable suspicion in many cases.
Impact:
Resulted in a court-ordered reform of NYPD’s stop-and-frisk practices.
Introduced court oversight and independent monitoring of the police department.
Sparked national debate and reforms about racial bias in policing.
Case 5: People v. Daniel Pantaleo (Eric Garner Case) (2019)
Issue: Police Use of Force and Accountability
Jurisdiction: New York State Criminal Court
Facts:
In 2014, Eric Garner died after NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo used a chokehold during an arrest, despite Garner’s repeated pleas of “I can’t breathe.” The chokehold was banned by NYPD policy.
Legal Question:
Can an officer be criminally prosecuted for use of a prohibited chokehold causing death?
Outcome:
Pantaleo was not criminally charged (grand jury declined indictment).
However, the NYPD fired Pantaleo in 2019 after an internal disciplinary trial.
Garner’s death sparked widespread protests and calls for police reform.
Impact:
Brought attention to police use-of-force policies and the difficulty in holding officers criminally accountable.
Led to renewed calls for body cameras, chokehold bans, and greater transparency.
Inspired legislative reform efforts on policing standards and accountability.
Summary of Key Takeaways
| Case | Key Legal Principle | Impact on Police Accountability |
|---|---|---|
| Tennessee v. Garner (1985) | Limits deadly force to immediate threat situations | Reformed use-of-force policies nationwide |
| Graham v. Connor (1989) | Established “objective reasonableness” standard for force | Framework for evaluating excessive force claims |
| Monell v. Department of Social Services (1978) | Municipalities can be liable for policies causing misconduct | Encouraged systemic police reforms |
| Floyd v. City of New York (2013) | Racial profiling in stop-and-frisk is unconstitutional | Court-ordered reforms and oversight |
| People v. Daniel Pantaleo (2019) | Challenges in criminal accountability for use of force | Sparked reform and public awareness |
RELATED Blog
0 comments