Software Piracy Prosecution
Software piracy refers to the unauthorized copying, distribution, or use of computer software. It is a violation of intellectual property rights and is punishable under various national and international laws. Software piracy undermines innovation, causes significant financial losses to developers and companies, and can pose security risks to users.
In legal terms, software piracy constitutes copyright infringement, and prosecution can be both civil and criminal depending on the jurisdiction and severity.
Below is a detailed explanation of how software piracy is prosecuted, followed by more than five landmark cases from different jurisdictions that show how courts handle such violations.
🧑⚖️ How Software Piracy is Prosecuted:
Identification of Infringement:
Software publishers often use anti-piracy tools, license keys, and audits to detect unauthorized usage. Industry groups like the BSA (Business Software Alliance) also investigate piracy claims.
Cease-and-Desist or Legal Notice:
The infringer is often issued a warning letter first. If ignored, civil lawsuits or criminal complaints may be filed.
Civil Prosecution:
The software company sues for damages, lost profits, and injunctive relief. Courts can order the infringer to stop using the software and to pay fines.
Criminal Prosecution:
In serious cases, especially involving commercial piracy (like selling pirated copies), criminal charges are filed under national copyright laws. Penalties can include imprisonment and heavy fines.
Remedies:
Statutory damages (pre-determined by law)
Actual damages and lost profits
Destruction of pirated software
Injunctions to stop further infringement
Criminal sanctions (fines or imprisonment)
📚 CASE LAWS ON SOFTWARE PIRACY
1. Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Computers & Electronics, Inc. (U.S. - 1997)
Facts:
Microsoft sued Harmony Computers for selling counterfeit Microsoft products, including pirated copies of Windows and Office. The company was found distributing thousands of unlicensed copies.
Issues:
Violation of copyright laws by distributing unauthorized copies of Microsoft's software.
Judgment:
The court ruled in favor of Microsoft and awarded $1.7 million in damages. The judge also granted a permanent injunction preventing Harmony from selling Microsoft software.
Significance:
This case set a precedent for large-scale damages in software piracy cases and emphasized the importance of license compliance for resellers.
2. Adobe Systems Inc. v. Southern Software Inc. (U.S. - 1998)
Facts:
Southern Software was accused of copying fonts from Adobe by slightly modifying them and selling them under different names.
Issues:
Whether minor modifications to copyrighted software remove copyright protection.
Judgment:
The court held that even minor modifications do not make the software original if the core structure remains copied. Adobe was awarded damages.
Significance:
This case clarified that derivative software that copies substantial parts of the original without authorization still constitutes infringement.
3. Microsoft Corp. v. Vijay Kaushik & Others (India - 2005)
Facts:
Microsoft India filed a complaint against a Delhi-based businessman, Vijay Kaushik, for selling pirated Microsoft products. The CBI conducted raids and seized several unlicensed software copies.
Issues:
Criminal liability for selling pirated software under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957.
Judgment:
The court framed criminal charges under Sections 63 and 63B of the Copyright Act. Though the case was settled later, it highlighted the criminal dimensions of software piracy in India.
Significance:
One of the early instances in India where criminal prosecution was invoked in a software piracy case.
4. Symantec Corp. v. Logical Plus Inc. (U.S. - 2009)
Facts:
Symantec filed a lawsuit against Logical Plus, a software reseller, for distributing unauthorized copies of Norton Antivirus software.
Issues:
Distribution of counterfeit security software which could compromise users' safety.
Judgment:
The court granted a default judgment against Logical Plus and awarded $2.5 million in damages. The ruling included injunctive relief to stop further distribution.
Significance:
The case showed how consumer trust and security are at risk from pirated software. It also reinforced the heavy penalties even when the defendant doesn't contest the case.
5. Microsoft v. M/S K Mayur Computers (India - 2007)
Facts:
Microsoft filed a civil suit against K Mayur Computers, a small IT company, for unauthorized use and installation of its software.
Issues:
Unauthorized installation of Windows and Office on client systems without proper licenses.
Judgment:
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction and awarded damages to Microsoft. The court emphasized that business users are not exempt from compliance with licensing laws.
Significance:
Important in Indian context as it reiterated that even small businesses can face civil consequences for piracy.
6. U.S. v. Robert Alan Stango (U.S. - Criminal Case, 2002)
Facts:
Robert Stango operated a website distributing thousands of pirated software programs, including Microsoft, Adobe, and others.
Issues:
Criminal charges under the No Electronic Theft (NET) Act for distributing copyrighted software for free.
Judgment:
He was sentenced to 33 months in federal prison, a $27,000 fine, and community service.
Significance:
One of the first criminal prosecutions under the NET Act, proving that even free distribution (non-commercial) can be prosecuted criminally.
7. BSA v. Pratibha Computers (India - 2011)
Facts:
The BSA (on behalf of Adobe, Microsoft, etc.) sued a Mumbai-based computer vendor for installing pirated software on assembled computers.
Issues:
Use of pirated software during hardware sales, a common practice among small vendors.
Judgment:
The Bombay High Court imposed fines and issued a permanent injunction.
Significance:
This case was part of BSA’s broader enforcement campaign in India, and it helped create awareness in small businesses about software license compliance.
🔍 Analysis
Common Themes:
Intent is not always required: In civil cases, even unintentional infringement may lead to damages.
Criminal liability: Exists where piracy is done willfully and at scale.
Corporate responsibility: Even resellers and small firms are liable.
International Enforcement: Companies like Microsoft, Adobe, and Symantec aggressively pursue cross-border actions.
📝 Conclusion
Software piracy is a serious legal offense that can attract both civil and criminal liability. Courts across the world, including in the U.S. and India, have repeatedly upheld the rights of software companies to protect their intellectual property. The rise in digital transactions and software usage has led to stronger enforcement, higher penalties, and more frequent prosecutions.
Key Takeaway:
Whether you're a business, reseller, or individual, using or distributing unlicensed software can result in hefty fines, injunctions, and even jail time. Proactive compliance is not just best practice—it’s legally essential.
RELATED Blog
0 comments