Fishing Regulation Violations

FISHING REGULATION VIOLATIONS IN FINLAND

Fishing in Finland is highly regulated under the Fisheries Act (kalastuslaki, 286/1982, as amended) and related environmental laws. Violations of fishing regulations are treated seriously, particularly when they threaten fish stocks, ecosystems, or protected species.

1. Legal Framework

A. Key Provisions of the Fisheries Act

Fishing rights and permits

Fishing requires either:

Personal fishing rights (private or public waters)

Fishing permit/licenses for specific waters

Certain methods (nets, traps, spears) are restricted.

Prohibited acts

Fishing without a valid permit

Using illegal gear or methods (e.g., explosives, electric fishing, oversized nets)

Exceeding quotas or size limits

Fishing in protected areas or during closed seasons

Penalties

Minor violations: fines (sakkorangaistus)

Serious or repeated violations: imprisonment up to 1 year

Confiscation of equipment and catch

Environmental protection integration

Violations that endanger ecosystems or protected species may also fall under the Environmental Protection Act.

2. Key Principles in Finnish Fishing Law

Legal authorization is mandatory – fishing without rights or permits is unlawful.

Method and gear restrictions protect sustainability.

Closed seasons are strictly enforced to preserve spawning.

Size and quota regulations prevent overfishing.

Repeated or organized violations increase penalties.

3. Illustrative Finnish Case Law

Here are six detailed cases showing how courts handle fishing regulation violations.

1. KKO 1997:41 – Fishing Without Permit

Facts

Defendant fished in a river without a permit for multiple days.

Court’s Reasoning

Permit required under Fisheries Act.

Even recreational fishing without authorization constitutes violation.

Outcome

Convicted, fined €2,000.
Significance: Legal requirement for fishing permits strictly enforced.

2. KKO 2002:45 – Use of Illegal Nets

Facts

Fisherman used large gill nets exceeding legal mesh size.

Caught significant amount of undersized fish.

Court’s Reasoning

Using prohibited gear threatens fish stocks.

Violation of both permit conditions and Fisheries Act.

Outcome

Convicted of fishing regulation violation, fined €3,500.

Nets confiscated.
Significance: Gear restrictions are actively enforced; confiscation is common.

3. Hovioikeus Helsinki 2005 – Fishing During Closed Season

Facts

Defendant fished salmon in a protected river during spawning season.

Court’s Reasoning

Closed seasons are vital for ecological preservation.

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.

Outcome

Convicted, fined €4,000.

Catch confiscated.
Significance: Closed season rules are strictly applied to protect endangered species.

4. KKO 2010:28 – Commercial Overfishing

Facts

Small commercial operator exceeded catch quotas in lakes for profit.

Court’s Reasoning

Quotas are mandatory to prevent depletion of fish populations.

Profit motive aggravates the violation.

Outcome

Convicted of serious fishing regulation violation, 6 months conditional imprisonment + fine €5,000.
Significance: Exceeding quotas, especially commercially, is treated severely.

5. Hovioikeus Eastern Finland 2014 – Fishing in Protected Area

Facts

Fishermen entered a designated conservation area and set traps.

Court’s Reasoning

Protected area restrictions are legally binding.

Environmental harm from illegal fishing is a key aggravating factor.

Outcome

Convicted, fined €3,000, traps confiscated.
Significance: Protected areas are strictly enforced; environmental impact increases penalty.

6. KKO 2018:37 – Organized Illegal Fishing Ring

Facts

Group systematically fished endangered fish in multiple lakes, selling illegally.

Court’s Reasoning

Organized, repeated, and profit-motivated fishing constitutes aggravated violation.

Threat to local fish stocks is severe.

Outcome

Convicted of aggravated fishing regulation violation, 8 months imprisonment (conditional) + fines and equipment confiscated.
Significance: Organized operations lead to harsher sentences.

4. Key Takeaways from Finnish Case Law

Permits are mandatory – recreational or commercial fishing without one is punishable.

Gear and method restrictions protect sustainability; violations lead to fines and confiscation.

Closed seasons and protected areas are enforced strictly.

Commercial or profit-driven violations attract higher penalties.

Organized and repeated violations can lead to imprisonment.

Courts often confiscate illegal catch and equipment in addition to fines.

LEAVE A COMMENT