Airline Pilot Intoxication Prosecutions
Airline Pilot Intoxication Prosecutions: Overview
Legal Context
Pilots are held to very strict standards regarding alcohol use, under both federal and state laws.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) prohibits pilots from:
Operating an aircraft with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.04% or higher.
Consuming alcohol within 8 hours of flying ("bottle to throttle" rule).
Criminal charges may apply if a pilot:
Operates an aircraft while intoxicated.
Poses danger to passengers or public safety.
Charges can include:
Operating an aircraft under the influence (OUI)
Reckless endangerment
Federal aviation violations
Key Cases of Airline Pilot Intoxication Prosecutions
1. United States v. James B. Ward (2015)
Background:
James Ward, a commercial airline pilot, was found intoxicated before a scheduled flight.
Facts:
Ward reported for duty with a BAC over the legal FAA limit.
Airline supervisors noticed signs of intoxication and removed him from the flight.
FAA investigation confirmed BAC of 0.06%.
Charges:
Operating an aircraft while intoxicated.
Violations of FAA regulations.
Potential endangerment of passengers.
Outcome:
Ward was suspended by the FAA.
Faced criminal prosecution at the state level.
The case reinforced strict FAA enforcement policies.
2. State v. Patrick Wilson (Washington, 2017)
Background:
Wilson, a regional airline pilot, was arrested for DUI after arriving for a flight visibly intoxicated.
Facts:
Police were called after reports of erratic behavior at the airport.
Wilson failed a field sobriety test; BAC measured 0.09%.
Flight was canceled for safety reasons.
Charges:
DUI (Driving Under the Influence) applied to pilot operating an aircraft.
Reckless endangerment for risking passenger safety.
Outcome:
Wilson pleaded guilty.
Received jail time, fines, and loss of pilot’s license.
Case set precedent for state DUI laws applied to pilots.
3. FAA v. John Doe (Anonymous Case, 2018)
Background:
An airline pilot was disciplined by the FAA for violating the “8-hour bottle-to-throttle” rule.
Facts:
Pilot consumed alcohol 6 hours before a flight.
No intoxication during the flight, but violation was confirmed by breathalyzer tests.
Charges:
FAA administrative violation.
Safety regulation breach.
Outcome:
FAA revoked pilot’s medical certificate temporarily.
Required remedial education and monitoring.
Demonstrated zero tolerance for timing violations.
4. United States v. Michael Parks (2012)
Background:
Parks, a cargo airline pilot, was charged after operating a flight while intoxicated.
Facts:
Parks admitted to drinking heavily before takeoff.
During the flight, crew reported impaired behavior.
Ground crew measured BAC of 0.07% after landing.
Charges:
Operating an aircraft under the influence.
Federal aviation violations.
Outcome:
Parks was convicted and sentenced to probation.
FAA revoked pilot’s certificate permanently.
Case highlighted danger of cargo and non-passenger flights too.
5. People v. Robert Harrison (California, 2019)
Background:
Harrison, a private pilot flying a charter flight, was arrested for intoxication after landing.
Facts:
Passengers noticed erratic behavior.
Blood tests showed BAC of 0.11%.
Charter company terminated Harrison.
Charges:
DUI.
Endangering passengers.
Outcome:
Convicted with jail time and pilot certificate suspension.
Reinforced that private pilots are also subject to strict alcohol rules.
Summary
Pilots face strict FAA and criminal laws regarding alcohol use.
Prosecutions often involve BAC over 0.04% or violating the “8-hour bottle-to-throttle” rule.
Criminal charges can include DUI, reckless endangerment, and aviation safety violations.
Penalties include jail, fines, license suspension/revocation.
Cases involve commercial, cargo, and private pilots.
These prosecutions emphasize public safety and strict compliance in aviation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments