Mediation In Minor Offences
What is Mediation in Minor Offences?
Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process where an impartial third party (mediator) helps the parties in a dispute reach a mutually acceptable settlement. In the context of minor offences, mediation allows offenders and victims to resolve issues outside the adversarial court process, focusing on reconciliation, restitution, and restoration rather than punishment.
Why Mediation in Minor Offences?
Reduces the burden on courts by resolving petty criminal cases amicably.
Promotes restoration of relationships and social harmony.
Provides faster resolution and reduces litigation costs.
Encourages accountability and responsibility in offenders.
Helps victims get compensation or apology without prolonged trials.
Legal Framework for Mediation in Minor Offences in India
Section 320 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC): Allows compounding of offences with the consent of the victim and the court.
Section 89 of the CrPC: Empowers courts to refer cases for settlement through mediation or other ADR methods.
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: Provides for Lok Adalats and mediation services.
Recent judgments have encouraged use of mediation especially in cases involving minor offences such as hurt, defamation, cheating, and offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years.
Important Case Laws on Mediation in Minor Offences
1. Shamim Ahmed v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2020 SC 4162
Facts: The Supreme Court emphasized the role of mediation in petty offences.
Ruling: The Court encouraged trial courts to promote mediation for minor offences wherever possible to reduce pendency and promote harmony.
Significance: This case reinforced that mediation is a valuable tool in criminal justice for minor cases, especially where the offences are compoundable.
2. Jayanth and Anr. v. State of Karnataka, (2019) 11 SCC 309
Facts: The case involved referral of minor criminal offences for mediation.
Ruling: The Supreme Court held that courts should actively consider mediation or conciliation in compoundable offences before proceeding to trial.
Significance: Underlined judicial responsibility to refer suitable cases for mediation to ease burden on courts.
3. Vijay Kedia v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 3175
Facts: The court dealt with offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce cases), which are compoundable.
Ruling: The Court encouraged mediation and settlement between parties in minor financial offences.
Significance: Expanded mediation to economic offences punishable with imprisonment not exceeding 7 years, emphasizing restoration over retribution.
4. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 965
Facts: Environmental pollution offences considered minor but with serious implications.
Ruling: The Supreme Court encouraged settlement and mediation as a means to achieve social justice and compliance.
Significance: Highlighted that mediation can be used in offences which have social and public interest aspects, to foster cooperation.
5. State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Patil, AIR 2004 SC 3040
Facts: The case pertained to a criminal breach of trust, a compoundable offence.
Ruling: The Supreme Court reiterated that compoundable offences are amenable to settlement and courts should actively promote mediation.
Significance: Reinforced the concept that mediation aids in speedy justice in minor offences.
Summary Table
| Case Name | Key Principle | Impact on Mediation in Minor Offences |
|---|---|---|
| Shamim Ahmed v. UP | Courts should promote mediation in petty cases | Encouraged mediation to reduce case backlog |
| Jayanth v. Karnataka | Referral of compoundable offences for mediation | Judicial duty to consider mediation |
| Vijay Kedia v. Union of India | Mediation in cheque bounce & financial cases | Applied mediation in economic offences |
| M.C. Mehta v. Union of India | Mediation in social/environmental offences | Mediation fosters social justice |
| State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Patil | Promotion of mediation in compoundable offences | Speeds up justice delivery in minor offences |
Conclusion:
Mediation in minor offences is increasingly recognized by Indian courts as an effective alternative to litigation, helping decongest courts, fostering reconciliation, and promoting restorative justice. The judiciary encourages its use, particularly in compoundable offences, reflecting a progressive approach towards criminal justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments