Workplace Safety Violation Prosecutions
🔹 Overview of Workplace Safety Violation Prosecutions
Workplace safety violations in the United States are primarily prosecuted under:
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA, 29 U.S.C. §§651–678)
State occupational safety laws
Criminal statutes for willful or reckless conduct causing death or serious injury (e.g., 18 U.S.C. §111 or §113 for assault, and sometimes manslaughter charges).
Prosecutions often involve:
Fatal workplace accidents
Willful disregard of safety regulations
Failure to train employees or maintain safe equipment
⚖️ Case 1: United States v. BP Products North America (Texas Refinery Explosion, 2005)
Facts:
A massive explosion at BP’s Texas City refinery killed 15 workers and injured over 170. OSHA found that BP ignored known safety risks in refinery operations.
Criminal Charges:
Willful violation of OSHA standards causing death
18 U.S.C. §111 (negligent manslaughter equivalent in federal context)
Outcome:
BP pleaded guilty to one felony count of violating the Clean Air Act and OSHA violations.
Paid $50 million in fines and agreed to extensive safety reforms.
Significance:
First major criminal prosecution of a corporation for workplace safety violations leading to fatalities, establishing corporate liability for reckless disregard.
⚖️ Case 2: United States v. DuPont de Nemours & Co. (West Virginia Chemical Plant, 2010)
Facts:
A chemical explosion at a DuPont plant killed two workers and injured dozens. Investigations found failure to maintain equipment and disregard for pressure vessel safety.
Criminal Charges:
Willful violation of OSHA regulations
18 U.S.C. §666 (fraud-related to unsafe practices)
Outcome:
DuPont paid $4 million in fines and implemented stricter safety training and monitoring programs.
Significance:
Reinforced that chemical plant operators can face federal criminal liability for unsafe practices causing fatalities.
⚖️ Case 3: United States v. Tesla, Inc. (2019–2021)
Facts:
Tesla’s Fremont factory faced multiple OSHA complaints regarding machine guarding failures, forklift accidents, and repetitive strain injuries. Several employees suffered severe injuries.
Criminal Charges:
Tesla was charged with willful violation of OSHA regulations.
Outcome:
Tesla agreed to pay fines totaling $137,000 and implement safety improvements.
No executives were criminally charged, but the case drew national attention.
Significance:
Showed OSHA’s authority to enforce compliance and the focus on corporate accountability even in modern tech companies.
⚖️ Case 4: United States v. BP America Refinery (Port Arthur, Texas, 2008)
Facts:
A worker at the BP Port Arthur refinery was killed due to unsafe storage and handling of flammable liquids. Investigations revealed management ignored repeated safety warnings.
Criminal Charges:
Willful OSHA violations causing death
Outcome:
BP pleaded guilty to one felony count under OSHA.
Paid $50 million in combined fines and restitution.
Significance:
Highlighted patterned corporate negligence in refinery operations and reinforced felony-level liability under OSHA.
⚖️ Case 5: United States v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corp. (2013)
Facts:
An elevator mechanic was killed during equipment maintenance due to failure to provide proper lockout/tagout procedures. OSHA found systemic safety violations.
Criminal Charges:
Willful violation of 29 U.S.C. §666 / OSHA regulations
Reckless endangerment
Outcome:
ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corp. agreed to $500,000 in criminal fines.
Required to implement stricter employee training and compliance programs.
Significance:
Demonstrated that safety protocol failures in maintenance and installation can result in criminal liability.
⚖️ Case 6: United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (2009)
Facts:
A construction worker died due to unsafe scaffolding at a gypsum manufacturing site. OSHA cited multiple violations, including inadequate fall protection and training.
Criminal Charges:
Willful OSHA violations causing death
Outcome:
The company pleaded guilty and paid $1.5 million in fines.
Safety protocols were mandated to prevent recurrence.
Significance:
Fall protection and training violations are a common basis for criminal liability in construction and manufacturing sectors.
⚖️ Case 7: United States v. Marathon Petroleum Corp. (Texas Refinery, 2017)
Facts:
Multiple chemical burns and fatalities occurred due to inadequate hazard communication and storage of flammable chemicals at Marathon’s Texas refinery.
Criminal Charges:
Willful OSHA violations leading to injury/death
Outcome:
Marathon pleaded guilty to three counts of willful OSHA violations and paid $4 million in fines.
Significance:
Reaffirmed corporate accountability for hazard communication and chemical safety compliance.
🧩 Key Legal Lessons from Workplace Safety Cases
| Legal Element | Typical Charges | Case Example |
|---|---|---|
| Willful OSHA violation causing death | Felony OSHA | BP Texas City, Marathon Petroleum |
| Equipment maintenance negligence | OSHA / Reckless Endangerment | ThyssenKrupp, DuPont |
| Chemical handling & storage | OSHA + Environmental Violations | BP Port Arthur, DuPont |
| Training and protocol failures | OSHA violations | United States Gypsum |
| Corporate criminal liability | Felony + Fines | Tesla, BP, Marathon Petroleum |
✅ Conclusion
Criminal prosecutions for workplace safety violations emphasize:
Corporate accountability for fatal accidents.
The importance of compliance with OSHA regulations and safety protocols.
Executive and managerial oversight may lead to individual liability if reckless or willful disregard of safety is proven.
Penalties range from millions in fines to mandated safety reforms and monitoring.
RELATED Blog
0 comments