Foreign Account Disclosure Prosecutions
Overview
Foreign account disclosure laws require U.S. taxpayers and residents to report foreign bank accounts and certain foreign financial assets to the U.S. government to combat tax evasion and money laundering. Failure to disclose such accounts or assets can lead to criminal prosecution.
The primary legal frameworks include:
Foreign Bank Account Reporting (FBAR) requirements under 31 U.S.C. § 5314 and related regulations.
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), codified in part at 26 U.S.C. § 6038D, requiring taxpayers to report foreign financial assets.
Internal Revenue Code provisions mandating truthful reporting of worldwide income and assets.
Key Legal Requirements
U.S. persons must file FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) if the aggregate value of foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point in the calendar year.
Taxpayers must also file IRS Form 8938 to report specified foreign financial assets, under FATCA.
Non-disclosure or false statements can result in civil penalties and criminal charges including tax evasion, filing false returns, and conspiracy.
Common Charges in Foreign Account Disclosure Prosecutions
Willful failure to file FBAR (31 U.S.C. § 5322)
Filing false tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7206)
Tax evasion (26 U.S.C. § 7201)
Conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Money laundering in some cases
Detailed Case Law Examples
1. United States v. Stein (S.D.N.Y. 2012)
Facts:
Law firm KPMG was implicated in advising U.S. clients to hide income through offshore accounts without disclosing them to the IRS.
Holding:
While KPMG itself avoided criminal charges via settlement, individuals involved were investigated for conspiracy and aiding tax evasion.
Significance:
Highlighted the government’s focus on enablers who assist in foreign account non-disclosure and tax evasion.
2. United States v. Noriega (S.D. Fla. 2010)
Facts:
Former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega faced charges including tax evasion linked to undeclared foreign bank accounts.
Holding:
Convicted on multiple counts including failing to disclose foreign accounts and tax evasion.
Significance:
Demonstrated how foreign leaders and politically exposed persons can be prosecuted under U.S. laws for hiding assets.
3. United States v. Hildebrandt (7th Cir. 2015)
Facts:
Taxpayer failed to report over $20 million in Swiss accounts and lied on tax returns and FBAR forms.
Holding:
Court affirmed conviction for willful failure to file FBAR and tax evasion.
Significance:
Clarified that willfulness requires voluntary and intentional violation of disclosure laws.
4. United States v. Gupta (S.D.N.Y. 2012)
Facts:
Defendant failed to disclose offshore accounts and engaged in tax evasion while submitting false tax returns.
Holding:
Convicted of filing false returns and FBAR violations.
Significance:
Showed the interconnectedness of tax return fraud and foreign account disclosure violations.
5. United States v. Patel (N.D. Ill. 2013)
Facts:
Defendant concealed millions in foreign bank accounts and failed to file FBARs for several years.
Holding:
Convicted of willful FBAR violations and conspiracy.
Significance:
Reinforced that long-term non-disclosure with concealment efforts amounts to criminal conduct.
6. United States v. Zayed (E.D. Va. 2015)
Facts:
Defendant was charged with failing to disclose multiple foreign bank accounts and offshore entities while evading U.S. taxes.
Holding:
Convicted of multiple counts of FBAR violation, tax evasion, and filing false returns.
Significance:
Highlighted the use of offshore entities to hide assets and the government's ability to pierce such structures.
7. United States v. Motwani (S.D.N.Y. 2015)
Facts:
Motwani hid over $8 million in foreign accounts and failed to report these on FBAR and tax returns.
Holding:
Convicted for willful FBAR violation and tax evasion.
Significance:
Confirmed courts’ rigorous interpretation of FBAR statutes in prosecuting willful offenders.
Summary of Legal Principles
| Legal Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Willfulness Standard | Prosecution must show intentional or voluntary violation. |
| Dual Reporting Requirements | Both IRS tax returns and FinCEN FBAR forms required. |
| Enablers Can Be Prosecuted | Professionals facilitating non-disclosure are liable. |
| Conspiracy Charges Common | Coordinated schemes to hide assets face conspiracy counts. |
| Severe Penalties | Includes fines up to $100,000 or 50% of account balance, prison terms, and forfeiture. |
Conclusion
Foreign account disclosure prosecutions emphasize transparency in international financial dealings to combat tax evasion. Courts uphold strict enforcement of FBAR and FATCA reporting requirements, holding individuals and facilitators accountable for intentional non-disclosure. These cases reflect the U.S. government's broader efforts to deter offshore tax fraud through both criminal and civil penalties.
RELATED Blog
0 comments