Campaign Finance Violations Prosecutions
Campaign Finance Violations: Overview
Campaign finance laws regulate the way money is raised and spent in political campaigns to promote transparency, prevent corruption, and ensure fair elections. Violations often involve:
Illegal contributions (over limits or from prohibited sources)
Failure to report contributions or expenditures
Use of straw donors to hide the real source of money
Coordinated spending exceeding legal caps
Foreign contributions (strictly prohibited)
Key federal laws:
Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA or McCain-Feingold Act)
Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations
Important Case Law and Prosecutions
1. United States v. McDonnell (2014)
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Facts:
Former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell was charged with accepting gifts and loans in exchange for official acts.
Issue:
Whether accepting gifts as part of political influence violated campaign finance laws.
Ruling:
Initially convicted of corruption, including campaign finance violations. However, the Supreme Court later narrowed the definition of "official acts," impacting bribery but not campaign finance enforcement generally.
Significance:
Highlighted the blurred line between gifts and illegal campaign contributions.
2. United States v. Blagojevich (2011)
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Facts:
Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was prosecuted for attempting to sell or trade President Obama's Senate seat, with campaign funds tied to the scheme.
Issue:
Use of campaign funds and office for personal gain.
Ruling:
Convicted of multiple charges, including campaign finance violations related to bribery and fraud.
Significance:
Showed how campaign finance laws intersect with corruption and abuse of office.
3. United States v. Dinesh D’Souza (2014)
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Facts:
D’Souza was charged with making illegal campaign contributions through straw donors.
Issue:
Circumventing contribution limits via false donor information.
Ruling:
Pled guilty to a felony campaign finance violation.
Significance:
Reinforced enforcement against attempts to hide real contributors.
4. Federal Election Commission v. Citizens United (2010)
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Facts:
Citizens United produced a documentary critical of a political candidate and sought to air it close to elections.
Issue:
Whether restrictions on corporate spending on political broadcasts violated First Amendment rights.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions can spend unlimited money on independent political communications.
Significance:
A landmark case reshaping campaign finance by allowing unlimited independent expenditures but still prohibiting direct coordination with campaigns.
5. United States v. Sheldon Adelson (2019) [Investigation]
Note: Although no prosecution occurred, investigations centered on alleged illegal foreign donations linked to Adelson’s political donations.
Significance:
Shows ongoing concerns about foreign influence in campaign finance.
6. United States v. Michael Cohen (2018)
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Facts:
Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former lawyer, pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations related to hush money payments disguised as legal expenses.
Issue:
Illegal contributions exceeding limits and failing to report expenditures.
Ruling:
Convicted as part of a plea deal.
Significance:
Demonstrated how campaign finance laws are enforced in politically sensitive contexts.
Key Legal Takeaways
Strict contribution limits and disclosure requirements are enforced to ensure transparency.
Use of straw donors or disguising true sources of money is a common violation.
Foreign nationals are prohibited from contributing to campaigns.
The line between legal gifts and illegal campaign contributions can be blurry but is critical.
Independent expenditures (e.g., PAC spending) have been expanded after Citizens United but coordination with campaigns remains illegal.
Campaign finance violations can be prosecuted under criminal statutes or through administrative penalties by the FEC.
0 comments