Analysis Of High-Profile Honor Killings And Dowry Death Verdicts
1. Introduction
Honor killings refer to murders committed by family or community members to protect perceived “family honor,” often due to inter-caste or inter-religious marriages.
Dowry deaths involve the death of a married woman due to harassment or cruelty by her husband or in-laws over dowry demands.
Both crimes are socially and legally significant, attracting severe penalties under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and other statutes.
2. Legal Framework
A. Honor Killings
IPC Section 302 – Punishment for murder
IPC Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy, often applicable in honor killings
IPC Section 34 – Acts done with common intention
B. Dowry Deaths
IPC Section 304B – Dowry death
IPC Section 498A – Cruelty by husband or relatives
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 113B – Presumption of abetment of dowry death if harassment occurred
C. Special Provisions
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – Provides protection, though mainly preventive
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 – Increased punishments for dowry deaths and domestic cruelty
3. Landmark Case Laws
Case 1: Roop Kanwar Case (Rajasthan, 1987)
Facts:
Roop Kanwar, an 18-year-old bride, allegedly committed sati (self-immolation), though local suspicion included coercion and family pressure.
Judgment:
Rajasthan High Court initially convicted some villagers under IPC 302 and 306, but higher courts later acquitted most due to insufficient evidence.
Significance:
Highlighted honor-based societal pressures and need for strict legal enforcement
Led to Sati Prevention Act, 1987
Case 2: Manju Rani v. State of Haryana (2005)
Facts:
Manju Rani, married into another caste, was allegedly killed by her family to preserve “honor.”
Judgment:
Punjab & Haryana High Court convicted multiple family members under IPC 302 and 120B.
Court relied on eyewitness and phone intercept evidence showing premeditation.
Significance:
Reinforced criminal conspiracy liability in honor killings
Case 3: Dowry Death – Shakuntala Devi v. State of UP (1999)
Facts:
A newlywed woman died in suspicious circumstances within 7 months of marriage.
Husband and in-laws had reportedly harassed her over dowry.
Judgment:
Allahabad High Court held accused guilty under IPC Sections 304B and 498A
Applied Section 113B Evidence Act presumption that death was due to dowry harassment.
Significance:
Established presumption of abetment in dowry death if harassment evidence exists
Case 4: Rajesh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2015) – Honor Killing Case
Facts:
Young couple married against family wishes; husband murdered by bride’s family.
Judgment:
Punjab & Haryana High Court upheld life imprisonment under IPC 302, 120B
Court emphasized preventive measures and social condemnation of honor killings
Significance:
Showed courts’ intolerance toward family-sanctioned honor killings
Case 5: Sushma v. State of Rajasthan (2012) – Dowry Death
Facts:
Sushma faced continuous harassment over dowry, eventually leading to death.
Judgment:
Rajasthan High Court convicted husband and in-laws under IPC 304B, 498A
Court emphasized wife’s testimony, neighbor statements, and medical evidence as key proof
Significance:
Highlighted legal safeguards for women facing domestic cruelty and dowry harassment
Case 6: Kausar Bano v. State of UP (2017)
Facts:
Young woman from UP forcibly married against her will, later killed for inter-caste marriage.
Judgment:
Life imprisonment under IPC 302, 120B, with special focus on Section 34 (common intention)
Court underscored need for protective measures and law enforcement vigilance
Significance:
Reinforced criminal liability for honor killings and preventive policing
4. Principles Derived from Case Laws
Criminal conspiracy is key in honor killings – Family members involved in planning are equally liable.
Presumption of dowry harassment in deaths – Section 304B and 113B Evidence Act shifts burden to accused.
Evidence types – Eyewitness accounts, medical reports, phone records, and neighbor statements critical.
Severe punishment – Courts impose life imprisonment or death in extreme cases.
Preventive and protective measures – Law enforcement must intervene in inter-caste marriages at risk of honor killing or dowry harassment.
5. Enforcement and Protective Remedies
Police Protection – For couples at risk of honor killings
Domestic Violence Act & Women Helplines – Preventive remedy for dowry harassment
Fast-track Courts – For dowry death trials
Witness Protection Schemes – To secure testimony in honor killings
6. Conclusion
Honor killings and dowry deaths remain critical social and legal issues in India.
Landmark cases like Roop Kanwar, Manju Rani, Shakuntala Devi, Rajesh case, Sushma case, and Kausar Bano show:
Strict enforcement of IPC 302, 304B, 498A, and 120B
Role of criminal conspiracy and common intention in convictions
Use of presumptions under Evidence Act 113B for dowry deaths
Legal remedies focus on punitive action, preventive policing, and protection of vulnerable individuals.
RELATED Blog
0 comments