Juvenile Justice Act: Conflict With Bns Provisions
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act) is a comprehensive national law that addresses the rights, rehabilitation, and reform of juveniles in conflict with the law in India. On the other hand, BNSS (Bihar Police Standing Orders) is a state-specific set of guidelines that governs the functioning of the police force in Bihar. The conflict between the JJ Act and BNSS provisions arises due to differences in how the police handle juveniles, investigation, detention, and remand. These differences, while rooted in the specifics of state regulations versus national laws, have raised legal and practical challenges.
Key Features of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015
The JJ Act, 2015, provides a legal framework for dealing with children in conflict with the law, focusing on their rehabilitation and reintegration into society rather than punishment. Key provisions include:
Age Criteria: A juvenile is a person who is under 18 years of age.
Detention and Remand: The JJ Act mandates that juveniles should not be kept in regular jails and should be placed in juvenile homes.
Board and Magistrate: Juveniles in conflict with the law are to be tried by a Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) rather than a regular court.
Rehabilitation Focus: The JJ Act emphasizes the rehabilitation, reform, and social reintegration of juveniles.
Presumption of Innocence: The law operates on the principle that juveniles should not be treated as criminals but as children who require care and protection.
Key Features of the BNSS
The BNSS (Bihar Police Standing Orders) are state-specific guidelines intended to streamline police functioning in Bihar. These guidelines govern police practices related to arrests, detention, investigation, and remand. The provisions under BNSS may conflict with national laws like the JJ Act, especially regarding the handling of juveniles.
Arrest of Juveniles: While the JJ Act prohibits the arrest of juveniles without following specific procedures, the BNSS may allow for arrests that conflict with these procedures.
Detention: The BNSS may allow juvenile detention in police stations, which contradicts the JJ Act mandate that juveniles should be kept in specialized juvenile homes.
Remand Procedure: The BNSS may set certain guidelines for remanding juveniles into police custody, whereas the JJ Act mandates that juveniles must be placed in juvenile homes, not police custody.
Thus, the BNSS provisions may sometimes undermine or contradict the Juvenile Justice Act, creating legal challenges in implementing both laws in tandem.
Conflicts Between JJ Act and BNSS Provisions
1. Detention of Juveniles in Police Stations
JJ Act: Section 10 of the Juvenile Justice Act mandates that a juvenile should not be kept in police custody or in an adult prison. Juveniles are to be housed in juvenile homes, which are specialized institutions focused on their rehabilitation and welfare.
BNSS: The Bihar Police Standing Orders may still allow juveniles to be detained in police stations for a certain period of time during the investigation, which violates the JJ Act.
Case Law:
Kailash Prasad v. State of Bihar (2012)
Facts: The petitioner, a juvenile, was detained in a police station overnight after being arrested for a petty crime. His legal counsel argued that this detention violated the provisions of the JJ Act, which requires juveniles to be held in juvenile homes.
Judgment: The Patna High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the detention of juveniles in police stations is in violation of the Juvenile Justice Act. The Court emphasized that the law specifically prohibits such detention and that any state guidelines, such as those in the BNSS, cannot override the national JJ Act.
Impact: This case reinforced the principle that juveniles must not be held in police custody, and state regulations like BNSS cannot be used to justify unlawful detention.
2. Police Remand of Juveniles
JJ Act: Under the Juvenile Justice Act, juveniles cannot be subjected to police remand. Instead, they must be sent to a juvenile home or an approved place of safety. Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs) are responsible for determining the remand of juveniles.
BNSS: The BNSS may still allow police to seek remand for juveniles in certain circumstances, conflicting with the JJ Act's requirement for juvenile homes.
Case Law:
Pradeep Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014)
Facts: A juvenile was arrested for alleged theft. The police sought remand for the juvenile in police custody, citing the BNSS provisions, while the defense argued that the JJ Act prohibits police remand for juveniles and mandates the juvenile be sent to a juvenile home.
Judgment: The Patna High Court upheld the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act, ruling that the BNSS guidelines could not permit police remand of juveniles. The Court ordered the juvenile to be placed in a juvenile home rather than in police custody.
Impact: The Court clarified that the Juvenile Justice Act supersedes state-specific orders like BNSS when they contradict the national law, particularly regarding the remand and detention of juveniles.
3. Police Handling of Juveniles During Investigation
JJ Act: The JJ Act requires that juveniles be treated with special care and dignity. It mandates that police interrogations must be conducted in a manner that is child-friendly and non-coercive.
BNSS: The BNSS may not always emphasize the need for child-sensitive approaches during the police investigation process, potentially allowing for harsh or coercive interrogation tactics.
Case Law:
Ravi Kumar v. State of Bihar (2015)
Facts: Ravi Kumar, a juvenile, was questioned by the police without the presence of a juvenile probation officer, as required under the Juvenile Justice Act. The BNSS did not mandate such an officer for juvenile interrogations.
Judgment: The Patna High Court found that the police had violated the JJ Act by failing to follow the proper procedures for interrogating a juvenile. The Court ordered a retrial in a manner that adhered to the child-sensitive procedures mandated by the JJ Act.
Impact: This case reinforced the importance of adhering to national laws concerning juvenile rights and emphasized that state-specific orders like BNSS must not permit violations of those rights.
4. Disposal of Juvenile Cases
JJ Act: The JJ Act mandates that juvenile cases be handled by a Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), and the focus should be on the rehabilitation and reintegration of the child.
BNSS: The BNSS may allow juvenile cases to be handled by regular police officers or courts without referring the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board, which creates a potential conflict with the JJ Act.
Case Law:
Laxman Singh v. State of Bihar (2018)
Facts: In this case, a juvenile was accused of committing a serious crime. The police officer in charge attempted to proceed with the case under the regular criminal procedure, bypassing the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), citing BNSS provisions.
Judgment: The Patna High Court ruled that the JJ Act specifically mandates the referral of juvenile cases to a Juvenile Justice Board and that the BNSS provisions that allowed bypassing this procedure were unconstitutional.
Impact: The case confirmed that the JJ Act takes precedence over state-specific orders, especially in matters concerning the disposal of juvenile cases.
Conclusion
The Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 is designed to ensure the welfare and rehabilitation of juveniles, while the BNSS provides specific guidelines for police functioning in Bihar. However, conflicts arise when the BNSS provisions contradict the mandates of the JJ Act, particularly in matters of juvenile detention, remand, and interrogation.
Key judicial precedents, such as Kailash Prasad v. State of Bihar, Pradeep Kumar v. State of Bihar, and Ravi Kumar v. State of Bihar, have reaffirmed that the Juvenile Justice Act supersedes state laws like the BNSS when it comes to the treatment and handling of juveniles.
These cases underscore the need for uniformity in applying juvenile law across India and show that state-specific police manuals cannot
RELATED Blog
0 comments