Prosecution Of Organized Extortion And Racketeering In Markets, Transport, And Urban Areas
1. People v. Salvatore "Sammy the Bull" Gravano (1990) – USA
Laws Involved: RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Interference with commerce by threats or violence), 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (Use of interstate commerce in aid of racketeering)
Facts:
Salvatore Gravano, an infamous figure in the Gambino crime family, was involved in racketeering activities that spanned several criminal enterprises, including extortion in the construction industry, illegal gambling, and drug trafficking. His criminal operations used threats of violence to force business owners, especially in the construction sector, to pay protection money. The extorted funds were often used to further the family’s criminal enterprises.
Judgment:
Gravano was convicted under the RICO Act, which was designed to target the corrupt activities of organized criminal enterprises.
He was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Gravano's testimony against John Gotti, the head of the Gambino family, was pivotal in securing convictions against high-ranking members of the Mafia.
The court highlighted the widespread impact of racketeering and extortion on legitimate businesses and the economy, stressing the importance of dismantling organized crime networks.
Significance:
This case is one of the most well-known examples of using RICO to dismantle organized crime syndicates.
It demonstrates how extortion in industries like construction is a form of racketeering and how organized crime families use violent tactics to enforce their control over local economies.
2. State v. Fermin "Fermín" Cruz (2013) – Dominican Republic
Laws Involved: Anti-Racketeering Law (Ley No. 155-17), Penal Code, Organized Crime Law
Facts:
Fermin Cruz was the leader of an extortion racket operating within the public transportation sector in the capital city of Santo Domingo. Cruz's group coerced bus operators and taxi drivers to pay a daily fee for "protection" against threats of violence and vandalism. They would often sabotage vehicles, block roads, or intimidate drivers who refused to comply with their demands. The extortion network was found to be connected to organized criminal groups involved in drug trafficking and arms smuggling.
Judgment:
Cruz was convicted under the Anti-Racketeering Law of the Dominican Republic and organized crime statutes.
He received a 20-year prison sentence for running an extortion operation and participating in organized criminal activities that affected a large segment of the population, particularly the transportation industry.
The court noted that organized crime undermines public confidence and disrupts critical sectors such as public transportation.
Significance:
This case is an example of how extortion and racketeering are applied to sectors such as transportation, where organized groups impose control through threats and violence.
It also highlights how anti-racketeering laws can be used effectively to combat extortion rings within urban areas.
3. United Kingdom v. The Birmingham Organised Crime Group (2015) – UK
Laws Involved: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Criminal Justice Act 2003, Serious Crime Act 2015
Facts:
The Birmingham Organised Crime Group was involved in widespread extortion in both the retail and transport sectors. The group targeted shop owners, especially in shopping districts, and coerced them into paying protection money to avoid thefts, vandalism, and other disruptive activities. They also used violent tactics to gain control of transport routes, ensuring that their illicit activities, such as drug smuggling, were able to operate with impunity.
Judgment:
The crime group was charged under the Serious Crime Act 2015, which targets organized criminal enterprises that involve violence, extortion, and money laundering.
The court sentenced the group’s leaders to lengthy prison terms, ranging from 12 to 25 years, for racketeering, extortion, and related crimes.
Additionally, the court utilized the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to seize assets and recover stolen money.
Significance:
This case is significant because it highlights the use of anti-racketeering legislation in the UK to combat organized extortion.
It also emphasizes the growing connection between organized crime and legitimate businesses, and how such groups use intimidation to establish control over vital sectors, including retail and transport.
4. United States v. The Latin Kings (2011) – USA
Laws Involved: RICO Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Interference with commerce by threats or violence)
Facts:
The Latin Kings, a notorious street gang operating in several U.S. states, engaged in extortion in urban neighborhoods, particularly targeting small businesses in Chicago and other cities. The gang would threaten business owners, demanding money for protection in exchange for safeguarding their properties from vandalism, robbery, or other acts of violence. The gang also engaged in drug trafficking, using their extortion activities to fund their criminal operations.
Judgment:
The Latin Kings were prosecuted under the RICO Act, as the racketeering enterprise had both local and interstate reach, involving multiple forms of illegal activity, including extortion and drug trafficking.
The leaders and members were convicted, and many received sentences ranging from 15 to 25 years in prison.
The court also ordered the forfeiture of assets, including properties and cash obtained through extortion and drug sales.
Significance:
The RICO Act was effectively used to dismantle a significant portion of the Latin Kings' operations, making this case an important example of how federal laws are used to target organized extortion within urban environments.
This case shows how street gangs use extortion to establish control over local businesses, often in combination with other illegal enterprises like drug trafficking.
5. People v. Gustavo "Tavo" Rivera (2018) – Mexico
Laws Involved: Federal Penal Code, Organized Crime Law, Anti-Extortion Law
Facts:
Gustavo Rivera was the leader of an extortion ring operating in the local markets and public transport system in Mexico City. The group would force street vendors and taxi drivers to pay regular fees for "protection" and would often engage in violent tactics to ensure compliance. The group also expanded into the construction industry, where they extorted businesses involved in public works, demanding a share of the profits in exchange for "safety" assurances.
Judgment:
Rivera was convicted under Mexico's Federal Penal Code and Organized Crime Law.
He was sentenced to 25 years in prison for orchestrating a large-scale extortion network that caused significant financial damage to both the formal and informal economies.
Additionally, the court ordered the seizure of assets that were traced back to the extortion activities.
Significance:
This case serves as an example of organized crime syndicates exerting control over markets and transport sectors in urban areas.
The use of Mexico's Anti-Extortion Laws and Organized Crime Law illustrates the government's push to combat criminal syndicates that exploit local economies and threaten public safety.
Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Racketeering | RICO (or similar laws) targets criminal enterprises that engage in a pattern of illegal activity, such as extortion or money laundering. |
| Extortion | Extortion is the act of obtaining money, goods, or services from an individual or business through threats of violence or harm. |
| Organized Crime | Prosecutions under organized crime laws seek to dismantle syndicates that engage in a variety of criminal activities, such as drug trafficking, extortion, and money laundering. |
| Money Laundering | Racketeering often involves laundering proceeds of crime through legitimate businesses, which authorities seek to seize in order to recover stolen funds. |
| Asset Forfeiture | Many racketeering cases result in asset forfeiture to strip criminal enterprises of the financial gains from their illegal activities. |
| Violence and Coercion | Organized extortionists often use violence, threats, and coercion to maintain control over victims and force compliance. |
Conclusion:
These cases illustrate the varied applications of anti-racketeering laws in prosecuting organized extortion in urban and transport sectors. Courts and law enforcement agencies have developed strategies to combat extortion by targeting not just individual perpetrators, but entire criminal enterprises that exploit vulnerable sectors of the economy. The growing use of RICO-style legislation and anti-organized crime laws across the globe highlights the commitment to eradicating such criminal operations and safeguarding legitimate businesses and public safety.
RELATED Blog
0 comments