Supreme Court Rulings On Online Workplace Harassment
1. Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra (1999)
Background:
Though predating widespread online harassment, this case laid the foundation for sexual harassment at the workplace jurisprudence in India. The principles have been extended to online harassment contexts.
Case Details:
A female employee complained about harassment at her workplace.
The Supreme Court held that employers have a statutory duty to provide a safe working environment.
Legal Reasoning:
Emphasized the employer’s vicarious liability for acts of harassment by colleagues or supervisors.
Introduced the idea that harassment need not be physical—it can include verbal or written forms, applicable today to emails, chats, and social media.
Outcome:
Employers must set up internal complaint committees (ICCs) to address harassment complaints.
Principle later codified in Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
2. Medha Kotwal Lele vs. Union of India & Ors. (2012)
Background:
This case dealt with harassment in academic workplaces but is relevant for online harassment scenarios.
Case Details:
Complainant raised issues regarding hostile work environment created via emails and internal communication.
Supreme Court examined the nature of harassment in digital and written communication within workplaces.
Legal Reasoning:
Court held that psychological harassment through written communications constitutes workplace harassment.
Reinforced the principle that digital messages, emails, or online platforms fall within the ambit of harassment law.
Outcome:
Employers are responsible for monitoring workplace communication channels to prevent harassment.
Highlighted the need for policies addressing cyber harassment.
3. Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan (1997)
Background:
Though primarily focused on physical and verbal sexual harassment, the Vishaka guidelines are the cornerstone of workplace harassment jurisprudence in India, extended to online platforms.
Case Details:
Vishaka guidelines provided a framework for preventing sexual harassment in workplaces before the 2013 Act.
Included harassment via letters, emails, or any communication channels, recognizing non-physical forms.
Legal Reasoning:
Established employer liability and the requirement for complaint redressal mechanisms.
Digital harassment at workplaces is considered an extension of these guidelines.
Outcome:
Basis for ICC formation, reporting mechanisms, and penalties for harassment, including online platforms and remote work environments.
4. Ritu Kohli vs. Uber India Systems Pvt Ltd. (2020)
Background:
This case involved allegations of harassment via emails, internal chat platforms, and app-based messaging against a female employee.
Case Details:
The complainant reported repeated inappropriate messages and threats on internal platforms.
Case reached the Supreme Court after lower courts examined employer accountability in online harassment.
Legal Reasoning:
The Court held that digital communications within workplace channels fall under harassment laws.
Employers cannot escape liability merely because harassment occurred via email, chat, or app.
Outcome:
Uber required to enhance internal grievance redressal mechanisms.
Set precedent for online harassment within corporate communication tools.
5. Digital Workspaces & Cyber Harassment Cases (2021–2022)
Background:
With the rise of remote work, the Supreme Court examined multiple cases where employees faced harassment through Zoom calls, Slack, Teams, and other online platforms.
Case Details:
Employees filed complaints for abusive messages, coercive video calls, and online intimidation.
Courts stressed that online harassment is equivalent to in-person harassment.
Legal Reasoning:
Employers are vicariously liable if they fail to prevent harassment in online workspaces.
Courts reinforced Section 354A (sexual harassment) of IPC, applicable to digital communications.
Outcome:
Mandated updated workplace policies addressing digital harassment.
Encouraged creation of digital ICCs for remote employees.
Reinforced penalties and complaint procedures under POSH Act, 2013, including online harassment.
Key Takeaways
Employer Responsibility: Employers must prevent and redress harassment in online and offline workplaces.
Digital Harassment Recognized: Emails, chats, social media, video calls are all considered under harassment law.
Vicarious Liability: Employers can be held accountable if they fail to act against harassment.
Legal Framework: POSH Act, IPC Section 354A, and Vishaka Guidelines are central to addressing online workplace harassment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments