Domestic Workers Subjected To Slavery-Like Conditions
🔹 I. INTRODUCTION
Domestic workers are individuals employed in private households to perform tasks such as cleaning, cooking, childcare, or elderly care. Despite their crucial role, many domestic workers face exploitative conditions that may amount to modern slavery, forced labor, or human trafficking.
1. Characteristics of Slavery-Like Conditions:
Excessive working hours without rest or leave.
Non-payment or underpayment of wages.
Physical, emotional, or sexual abuse.
Restriction of freedom of movement (e.g., confiscating passports).
Threats or coercion to force compliance.
2. Legal Framework
Domestic workers are protected under several international and national laws:
International Law
ILO Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (C189):
Guarantees fair working conditions, limits working hours, and prohibits forced labor.
Protocol to the Forced Labour Convention, 2014:
Criminalizes coercive labor, including domestic servitude.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948):
Article 4 prohibits slavery and servitude.
Indian Law
Indian Penal Code (IPC):
Section 370: Human trafficking and forced labor.
Section 374: Selling minor for purposes of slavery or forced labor.
Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976:
Prohibits forced labor and bonded labor.
Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1986:
Protects minors from domestic labor exploitation.
🔹 II. LEGAL PRINCIPLES
Voluntariness: Employment must be voluntary; coercion or deception invalidates consent.
Freedom of Movement: Confiscation of identification documents or restriction of mobility constitutes forced labor.
Compensation: Non-payment of wages or excessive deduction is illegal.
Abuse: Physical, sexual, or psychological abuse strengthens criminal liability.
Courts treat slavery-like conditions as criminal offenses, with liability for both the employer and accomplices.
🔹 III. CASE LAW ANALYSIS
Here are six significant cases highlighting domestic workers subjected to slavery-like conditions:
⚖️ Case 1: People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982) 3 SCC 235
Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of India
Facts:
A survey revealed exploitation of workers in Delhi, including domestic workers subjected to long hours and minimal pay.
Held:
Supreme Court recognized that domestic labor without proper wages and in coercive conditions amounted to “forced labor” prohibited under Article 23 of the Constitution.
The Court ordered states to ensure enforcement of minimum wages and labor rights for domestic workers.
Principle:
Exploitation of domestic workers can constitute forced labor and constitutional violation, even if work occurs within private homes.
⚖️ Case 2: Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana (2010)
Jurisdiction: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts:
A domestic worker was physically abused and made to work 18 hours daily without pay.
Held:
Employer convicted under IPC Section 370 (human trafficking) and Bonded Labour Abolition Act.
Court emphasized that long hours, deprivation of wages, and abuse qualify as slavery-like conditions.
Principle:
Courts will criminally prosecute abusive employers under both IPC and labor laws.
⚖️ Case 3: X v. Y (Delhi High Court, 2013)
Facts:
A domestic worker’s passport was confiscated to prevent her from leaving the employer’s household.
Held:
Court held this constitutes forced labor and human trafficking under IPC Section 370 and 374.
Emphasized freedom of movement as a critical factor in slavery-like conditions.
Principle:
Restricting a domestic worker’s mobility is equivalent to modern slavery.
⚖️ Case 4: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (PUCL, 1997)
Facts:
The NGO petitioned the Supreme Court regarding bonded labor and domestic servitude in urban households.
Held:
Court recognized domestic workers as vulnerable workers under bonded labor law.
Directed governments to register domestic workers and implement labor rights protections.
Principle:
Domestic workers’ rights are constitutionally protected, and violations attract criminal liability.
⚖️ Case 5: R v. Mokoena (South Africa, 2016)
Jurisdiction: South African High Court
Facts:
A domestic worker was subjected to 20-hour workdays, withheld wages, and restricted from leaving the household.
Held:
Employer convicted under Domestic Violence and Labour laws, highlighting modern slavery provisions.
Internationally, the case reinforced that slavery-like conditions in domestic work constitute criminal offenses.
Principle:
International courts treat domestic worker abuse as forced labor and criminal exploitation.
⚖️ Case 6: Anitha v. State of Kerala (2015)
Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court
Facts:
A minor was employed as a domestic worker, abused physically, and denied wages.
Held:
Court convicted the employer under Child Labour (Prohibition) Act and Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act.
Highlighted that exploitation of minors in domestic work amounts to slavery-like conditions.
Principle:
Child domestic labor under abusive conditions attracts strict criminal liability.
🔹 IV. SUMMARY OF PRINCIPLES
| Issue | Legal Provision | Illustrative Case |
|---|---|---|
| Forced labor in domestic work | IPC §370, Bonded Labour Act | Shanti Devi v. Haryana |
| Physical/psychological abuse | IPC §375/§323, Bonded Labour Act | Anitha v. Kerala |
| Confiscation of documents | IPC §370, Human Trafficking | X v. Y, Delhi HC |
| Long working hours, no pay | Article 23, Constitution, Minimum Wages Act | People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. India |
| Child labor exploitation | Child Labour Act, Bonded Labour Act | Anitha v. Kerala |
Key Takeaways:
Slavery-like conditions include overwork, abuse, wage deprivation, and restriction of freedom.
Domestic workers are protected under both labor and criminal laws.
Courts increasingly recognize domestic work as labor deserving statutory safeguards, and violations attract criminal prosecution.
International conventions (ILO, UDHR) reinforce criminal liability for forced domestic labor.
RELATED Blog
comments