Decriminalization Trends In Bns (E.G., Adultery, Attempt To Suicide)
What is Decriminalization?
Decriminalization means the process of removing criminal penalties for certain acts which were previously punishable under law. Instead, these acts may be regulated under civil law or not penalized at all.
In India, several socially significant offenses like adultery and attempt to suicide have undergone legal reforms through judicial interpretation and legislative changes, moving towards decriminalization.
1. Decriminalization of Adultery (Section 497 IPC)
Background:
Section 497 of IPC criminalized adultery, treating it as an offense committed by a man against the husband of the woman involved.
It was a gender-biased law that did not penalize the woman and treated her as property of her husband.
The law had colonial roots and was widely criticized for violating fundamental rights.
Landmark Cases on Adultery:
a) Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) — Supreme Court of India
Facts: A challenge was made to the constitutionality of Section 497 IPC on grounds of gender discrimination and violation of privacy.
Judgment: The Supreme Court struck down Section 497 as unconstitutional.
Reasoning: The Court held that:
The law was arbitrary and discriminatory.
It violated Article 14 (Equality) and Article 21 (Right to Privacy) of the Constitution.
Adultery is a private matter between consenting adults and should not be criminalized.
Takeaway: This was a landmark judgment signaling progressive decriminalization of morality-based offenses.
b) S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal (2010) — Supreme Court of India
Though not directly about adultery, this case emphasized the right to personal liberty and privacy as fundamental rights.
The Court's reasoning influenced later judgments like Joseph Shine.
c) Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (2013) — Supreme Court of India
While about Section 377 (homosexuality), this case showed the Supreme Court grappling with personal autonomy and morality laws.
It highlighted the need for courts to reconsider morality-based criminal offenses.
d) Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) — Supreme Court of India
The landmark Right to Privacy judgment provided the constitutional basis for decriminalizing adultery, emphasizing personal choices and dignity.
Summary of Adultery Decriminalization:
The trend moved from moral policing to personal autonomy.
Adultery is no longer a criminal offense in India, but it may still have civil consequences (divorce, maintenance).
The decision was hailed for upholding gender equality and privacy rights.
2. Decriminalization of Attempt to Suicide (Section 309 IPC)
Background:
Section 309 IPC criminalized the attempt to commit suicide, punishable by imprisonment or fine.
It was criticized as counterproductive, punishing victims who need care and support.
Suicide attempts are often linked to mental health issues; criminalization was seen as outdated.
Landmark Cases on Attempt to Suicide:
a) Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996) — Supreme Court of India
Facts: The constitutional validity of Section 309 IPC was challenged.
Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the law but carved out an exception:
The right to die with dignity was not part of the right to life under Article 21.
Suicide is not a fundamental right.
Takeaway: At that time, the Court maintained criminality but left room for legislative change.
b) Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (Legislation, Not Case Law)
This Act marked a policy shift, stating that a person who attempts suicide should be presumed to have severe stress and should not be punished.
Section 115 of the Act provides immunity from prosecution under Section 309 IPC.
This is a form of de facto decriminalization via legislation.
c) K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) — Supreme Court
Although primarily about privacy, this judgment influenced the discourse on mental health and personal autonomy, indirectly supporting compassionate approaches to suicide attempts.
d) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) — Supreme Court
This judgment decriminalized homosexuality by reading down Section 377 IPC.
It established a broader principle that criminal law should not intrude into personal autonomy and dignity, influencing thoughts on Section 309 IPC.
e) Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) — Supreme Court
The Court recognized the right to die with dignity under Article 21 in the context of passive euthanasia.
While not directly about suicide attempts, it reflects a judicial trend towards respecting individual autonomy regarding life and death decisions.
Summary of Attempt to Suicide Decriminalization:
The Supreme Court earlier upheld criminality but modern legislation like the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 effectively decriminalized attempts to suicide.
The approach is now more about rehabilitation and mental health support rather than punishment.
Courts continue to develop principles around personal autonomy and dignity influencing future decriminalization trends.
Other Relevant Trends:
Many other morality or victimless crimes are being reviewed globally for decriminalization.
Decriminalization often follows constitutional rights to privacy, equality, and dignity.
Courts balance public interest and individual freedoms in evolving social contexts.
Summary Table of Cases Discussed:
| Case Name | Year | Subject | Outcome/Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Shine v. Union of India | 2018 | Adultery (Section 497) | Decriminalized adultery, upheld privacy |
| Gian Kaur v. Punjab | 1996 | Attempt to Suicide (309) | Upheld criminality with some exceptions |
| Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 | — | Attempt to Suicide | Immunity from prosecution for attempt |
| Puttaswamy v. Union of India | 2017 | Privacy & Autonomy | Right to privacy, dignity upheld |
| Common Cause v. Union of India | 2018 | Right to Die/Euthanasia | Right to die with dignity recognized |
Conclusion:
India’s legal system is progressively decriminalizing offenses like adultery and attempt to suicide.
The focus is shifting towards respecting individual autonomy, dignity, and privacy.
Courts have played a major role in striking down discriminatory laws and prompting legislative reforms.
The evolving jurisprudence aligns with modern constitutional values.
RELATED Blog
0 comments