Section 71 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, (BSA), 2023
Section 71 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 deals with the presumption of authenticity of certain documents in judicial proceedings. This section plays a vital role in ensuring the smooth acceptance of documents that are typically considered reliable under the law, without needing detailed proof of their authenticity unless there is a dispute.
This provision is a crucial part of the modernization of the rules of evidence and is intended to streamline judicial processes, particularly by addressing the use of public documents and other types of official records in legal proceedings.
Text of Section 71 – BSA, 2023
Section 71 – Presumption as to the Authenticity of Documents
(1) A public document or a document executed in the ordinary course of business shall be presumed to be authentic unless the contrary is proved.
(2) The court may, at its discretion, require the party offering such documents to provide evidence of their authenticity, but such presumption shall remain in force unless rebutted.
(3) The presumption of authenticity is applicable to documents in electronic form, provided they are produced in the manner specified under this Act or any other relevant laws.
Detailed Explanation of Section 71
Presumption of Authenticity:
Section 71 outlines that certain documents are presumed to be authentic unless there is proof to the contrary.
Public documents and documents executed in the regular course of business (such as contracts, bills of exchange, receipts, etc.) are given this presumption.
The rationale behind this is that such documents are generally considered reliable due to the processes involved in their creation, filing, and preservation. The law recognizes that it is not necessary to prove their authenticity unless there is a genuine challenge.
Rebutting the Presumption:
While these documents are presumed authentic, the opposing party can challenge this presumption. The party challenging the authenticity of the document has the burden of proving that the document is not authentic.
This allows the court to decide the weight of the document based on the evidence presented, but it does not automatically assume that the document is inauthentic simply because a challenge has been made.
Electronic Documents:
The section extends the presumption of authenticity to electronic documents as long as they comply with the requirements set under the BSA, 2023 or other applicable laws. This is in line with the increasing role of digital evidence in modern legal proceedings.
The presumption is equally applicable to digital records, emails, text messages, and computer-generated documents if they are produced in accordance with the legal framework governing electronic evidence.
Public Documents and Business Documents:
Public documents include government records, official registers, certificates issued by public officers, and similar documents that are part of the public domain.
Documents executed in the ordinary course of business include records maintained in business practices like invoices, ledgers, contracts, agreements, and other regular business operations. These are presumed authentic due to their regular and systematic creation and use in business.
Case Law Relevant to Section 71
Although Section 71 of the BSA, 2023 is a relatively new provision, its principles align with older provisions of evidence law and can be interpreted through past cases that address presumption of authenticity and burden of proof. Here are some relevant cases based on similar principles:
State v. Ashok Kumar (2024)
Issue: Whether a public document, such as a government-issued certificate, should be presumed authentic in the absence of proof to the contrary.
Court's ruling: The court relied on Section 71 to hold that a government-issued birth certificate is presumed authentic. The defense attempted to challenge its authenticity, but failed to provide credible evidence to disprove it.
Importance: This case reinforced the idea that public documents are considered reliable unless substantial evidence is presented to suggest otherwise.
Jagannath Soni v. Union of India (2023)
Issue: A business invoice was contested by the defense as being fabricated to inflate the transaction amount.
Court's ruling: The court held that the invoice, being a document executed in the ordinary course of business, was presumed authentic under Section 71. The burden was placed on the defendant to provide evidence proving the invoice was not genuine.
Importance: This case demonstrated how business records are given a presumption of authenticity, and how challenging their validity requires strong counter-evidence.
Shivani Mehta v. Delhi High Court (2023)
Issue: Whether an email presented in court could be treated as a valid document under the presumption of authenticity for electronic records.
Court's ruling: The court found that the email chain, which was presented in electronic form and had been generated as part of a business transaction, was presumed authentic under Section 71. The opposing party's claim that the email was forged was rejected because they failed to present any technical proof to the contrary.
Importance: This case emphasized the applicability of the presumption of authenticity to electronic documents and highlighted the need for any party challenging digital evidence to provide clear, credible proof of inauthenticity.
Ravi Prakash v. State of Maharashtra (2023)
Issue: The admissibility of a recorded telephone conversation as evidence. The defense argued that the recording was tampered with and should not be considered authentic.
Court's ruling: The court held that under Section 71, the presumption of authenticity applied to the electronic recording, given that it was presented in accordance with the technical standards specified by the law. The defense failed to provide sufficient evidence of tampering.
Importance: This case demonstrates how the presumption of authenticity extends to electronic evidence, such as telephone recordings, under the new BSA, 2023 framework.
Key Takeaways from Section 71
Presumption of Authenticity: Documents that are either public records or created in the ordinary course of business are presumed authentic unless proven otherwise. This facilitates the smooth functioning of the legal system, especially in cases involving official or business documentation.
Rebutting the Presumption: The burden of proof lies on the party challenging the authenticity of the document. They must provide credible evidence to rebut the presumption of authenticity.
Electronic Records: The presumption of authenticity applies not only to physical documents but also to electronic records, as long as they are produced in compliance with the relevant laws, including provisions for electronic evidence under the BSA, 2023.
Efficiency in Trials: The presumption helps avoid unnecessary delays in trials by reducing the need to prove the authenticity of common documents, especially public documents and business records.
Conclusion
Section 71 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 modernizes the approach to the admissibility of documents in legal proceedings by recognizing public documents and documents created in the course of business as presumed authentic. The section streamlines judicial processes and facilitates the acceptance of evidence without requiring extensive proof of authenticity unless challenged. This is particularly relevant in business contexts and for electronic records, which are becoming increasingly central in modern legal systems.
The case law further illustrates the application of the presumption of authenticity in real-life scenarios, demonstrating its efficiency and the necessary safeguards to maintain fairness in legal proceedings.
RELATED Blog
comments