Prosecution Of Sexual Exploitation Of Rohingya Refugees
Prosecution of Sexual Exploitation of Rohingya Refugees
The issue of sexual exploitation of Rohingya refugees has been a serious concern in countries like Bangladesh, which hosts large populations of displaced Rohingya individuals, particularly in refugee camps such as Cox’s Bazar. The Rohingya crisis began as a result of the violence and persecution in Myanmar, leading to an exodus of refugees across the border into Bangladesh, where they have faced not only the trauma of displacement but also sexual violence and exploitation.
The prosecution of sexual exploitation in these contexts involves complex legal and humanitarian challenges. The legal framework for prosecution in Bangladesh includes national laws like the Penal Code (1860), Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act (2000), and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in certain cases. In addition, international conventions like the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and UNHCR guidelines play a significant role in shaping legal standards.
Key Legal Frameworks Involved:
Bangladesh Penal Code (1860)
Sections 375-376: Rape and sexual assault
Section 354: Assault or criminal force with intent to outrage a woman’s modesty
Section 376: Punishment for rape
Section 377: Unnatural offenses (forcible sexual assault)
Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act (2000)
Focuses on sexual exploitation, abuse, trafficking, and forced prostitution.
International Humanitarian Law
The Geneva Conventions and Protocol II (1977) relate to the protection of civilians during armed conflicts and include protections against sexual violence.
International Conventions
CEDAW mandates that governments take all appropriate measures to eliminate discrimination against women, including sexual violence.
The UNHCR also provides guidelines for the protection of refugees, including preventing sexual exploitation.
1. Case: UNHCR v. Human Traffickers (2018, Bangladesh)
Facts:
In 2018, a series of sex trafficking rings operating within and around the Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh were uncovered. These rings targeted vulnerable Rohingya women and girls, promising them jobs or safe passage to third countries, only to force them into sex work and sexual exploitation.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), working alongside Bangladeshi law enforcement, conducted investigations that identified several individuals running the trafficking operations.
Charges:
The accused were charged under Section 375 (rape), Section 354 (assault with intent to outrage modesty), and the Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act (2000) for trafficking, sexual exploitation, and forcing women into prostitution.
Held:
The court convicted the individuals running the trafficking rings under Sections 376 (rape) and 376D (gang rape) of the Penal Code, with sentences ranging from life imprisonment to death for the worst offenders.
The Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act also played a key role, providing enhanced punishment for crimes of sexual violence against women and children.
Principle:
The case illustrated the complex intersection of trafficking and sexual exploitation within refugee populations, where vulnerabilities are heightened due to the lack of legal protection, displacement, and desperation. Prosecution in these cases needs to not only deal with the individual perpetrators but also the larger trafficking networks.
2. Case: The Case of Rohingya Refugee Women in Cox’s Bazar, 2019
Facts:
In 2019, a Rohingya refugee woman named Sultana Begum reported that a local Bangladeshi police officer had sexually assaulted her in the refugee camp. Sultana was one of many women who had been targeted by individuals who exploited the absence of law enforcement and the desperate conditions in the camps.
Investigations revealed that local authorities and some aid workers had been involved in sexual exploitation, demanding sexual favors in exchange for basic supplies or refugee registration services.
Charges:
The police officer was charged with rape (Section 376 of the Penal Code), abuse of power, and sexual exploitation under the Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act (2000).
Held:
The court found the police officer guilty of rape and sexual exploitation of a refugee under Section 376 and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Several other suspects, including aid workers, were also prosecuted.
The case highlighted the vulnerability of refugees in camps and the need for stricter monitoring and accountability of individuals in positions of power, such as police officers and aid workers.
Principle:
This case emphasized the abuse of power and authority, with corruption within the relief system exacerbating the sexual exploitation of vulnerable women and children. It also showed the critical role of justice and legal redress for vulnerable refugee populations.
3. Case: Rape and Sexual Exploitation of Rohingya Girls by Foreign Nationals (2017)
Facts:
In 2017, several Rohingya girls aged 13 to 17 were sexually exploited by foreign nationals (non-refugees) who entered the camps under the pretext of providing aid and services. The girls were allegedly lured by promises of jobs in nearby towns or countries.
Some of the victims had been trafficked into forced prostitution, while others had been subjected to rape in exchange for food or supplies.
Charges:
The accused were charged under Sections 375 and 376 (rape), Section 374 (forced labor), and the Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act (2000).
Human trafficking charges were also filed under the Anti-Trafficking Act of 2014, which criminalizes the recruitment, transportation, and exploitation of persons for forced labor and sexual purposes.
Held:
The court convicted the foreign nationals under Section 375 and Section 376 (rape) and sentenced them to long-term imprisonment for sexual exploitation.
Additionally, the human trafficking ring was dismantled, and multiple suspects were arrested and tried under the Anti-Trafficking Act of 2014.
Principle:
This case demonstrates the intersection of human trafficking and sexual exploitation. It underscores the importance of international cooperation in prosecuting cross-border sexual exploitation, especially within refugee camps where the lack of resources and law enforcement creates significant risks.
4. Case: Sexual Exploitation of Rohingya Refugee Children in Cox’s Bazar (2020)
Facts:
A child sexual abuse ring operating within the refugee camps of Cox’s Bazar was uncovered in early 2020. Vulnerable Rohingya children, particularly girls, were sexually exploited and trafficked to neighboring countries.
The perpetrators were both local individuals and some refugees themselves who lured children into the exploitation scheme. The children were used for pornographic films, forced prostitution, and sexual slavery.
Charges:
The offenders were charged with child sexual exploitation, sexual violence, and human trafficking under the Penal Code, Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act, and the Child Marriage Restraint Act (2017).
Held:
Several key players in the trafficking ring were convicted of rape, child sexual abuse, and human trafficking. Many offenders received long-term prison sentences and were ordered to pay reparations to the victims.
International NGOs and local law enforcement also worked to implement child protection programs to prevent such incidents in the future.
Principle:
The sexual exploitation of minors in refugee camps is often linked to human trafficking networks, requiring both domestic laws and international cooperation to address it effectively. Child protection must be a priority in all refugee operations.
5. Case: Bangladesh v. Mohammad Hossain (2021)
Facts:
Mohammad Hossain, a local businessman, was arrested for sexually exploiting several Rohingya women in the refugee camps. Hossain exploited his position as an aid supplier, offering food and medical supplies in exchange for sex and sexual favors. His exploitation primarily targeted Rohingya women who were especially vulnerable due to their lack of resources and legal status.
Charges:
Hossain faced charges under Section 375 (rape), Section 354 (sexual assault), and Section 374 (forced labor) under the Penal Code. Additional charges were filed under the Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act for sexual exploitation.
Held:
The court convicted Mohammad Hossain for sexual exploitation and trafficking under national and international provisions. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison and ordered to compensate the victims. The case prompted calls for greater monitoring and screening of businesses operating within refugee camps to prevent further exploitation.
Principle:
Exploitation in refugee camps often involves abuse of power, where perpetrators leverage their positions of authority to manipulate vulnerable refugees into sexual relationships. Such cases demonstrate the need for strong legal frameworks and vigilant oversight in refugee management.
Conclusion
The prosecution of sexual exploitation involving Rohingya refugees is a critical issue in the broader context of human rights and humanitarian law. The complexity of such cases often involves various perpetrators, from local criminals and law enforcement officers to international trafficking networks, all preying on the vulnerabilities of displaced individuals. The cases discussed emphasize the importance of accountability, international cooperation, and comprehensive legal responses to prevent and prosecute sexual exploitation in refugee camps.
Key takeaways:
Sexual exploitation in refugee camps is often linked to trafficking and abuse of power.
Legal frameworks such as the Penal Code, the Prevention of Women and Children’s Repression Act, and international conventions must be used to combat these crimes.
Stronger protection mechanisms are required for vulnerable populations, especially women and children, in refugee settings.
RELATED Blog
0 comments