Juvenile Diversion Programmes
JUVENILE DIVERSION PROGRAMMES IN FINLAND
Juvenile diversion programmes in Finland are a key part of the restorative and rehabilitative approach to youth crime. The system aims to divert young offenders away from formal criminal proceedings toward rehabilitation, education, and social reintegration.
Juvenile diversion is codified in the Juvenile Sanctions Act (Laki nuorisorangaistuksesta, 2005/768), Criminal Code, and the Criminal Procedure Act.
1. Legal Framework
A. Applicability
Juvenile diversion applies to offenders under 18 years old.
Typically used for minor or first-time offences, such as:
Theft or shoplifting
Minor assaults
Vandalism
Truancy-related offences
Substance abuse-related offences
B. Key Goals
Prevent reoffending by addressing underlying causes.
Avoid criminal record for minor offences.
Promote responsibility and restitution toward victims.
Engage family and social services in rehabilitation.
C. Methods
Mediation with victims
Community service or educational programmes
Counselling (behavioral, substance abuse, or social)
Conditional warnings or agreements
D. Legal Effect
Successful diversion prevents formal prosecution.
Non-compliance may lead to resumption of normal criminal proceedings.
2. Principles in Finnish Case Law
Diversion prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment.
Voluntary participation is essential.
Courts consider age, maturity, and social background of the juvenile.
Victim involvement (apology, restitution) increases success rate.
Program completion can lead to dismissal of charges or reduced sentencing if prosecution continues.
3. Illustrative Finnish Case Law Examples
Here are six notable Finnish cases involving juvenile diversion programmes:
1. KKO 2003:45 – Theft by Juvenile
Facts
16-year-old stole a bicycle from a neighbour.
Participated in a diversion programme involving restitution and counselling.
Court’s Reasoning
Juvenile was first-time offender.
Diversion served rehabilitative and restorative purposes.
Outcome
Charges dismissed upon successful completion of programme.
Significance: Diversion avoids formal criminal record for first-time offenders.
2. Hovioikeus Helsinki 2006 – Shoplifting Incident
Facts
15-year-old caught stealing from a store.
Diversion included apology to victim, restitution, and participation in educational workshop.
Court’s Reasoning
Emphasized restorative justice and prevention of recidivism.
Outcome
Formal prosecution suspended; case closed after completion.
Significance: Diversion programmes integrate victim-offender reconciliation.
3. KKO 2010:28 – Minor Assault at School
Facts
17-year-old physically assaulted classmate during argument.
Programme included counselling, mediation, and community service.
Court’s Reasoning
Diversion mitigated developmental and social risk factors.
Court prioritized rehabilitation over punitive measures.
Outcome
No criminal record; juvenile completed programme successfully.
Significance: Diversion supports behavioral correction for youth offenders.
4. Hovioikeus Eastern Finland 2013 – Vandalism by Teenagers
Facts
Group of 16–17-year-olds vandalized school property.
Participated in community service, educational sessions, and repair of property.
Court’s Reasoning
Early intervention through diversion prevents reinforcement of delinquent behavior.
Outcome
Charges withdrawn upon successful completion of restitution and community service.
Significance: Diversion effectively addresses group offenses among youth.
5. KKO 2015:37 – Substance-related Offences
Facts
17-year-old caught with small amount of drugs.
Programme included counselling, drug education, and family support.
Court’s Reasoning
Diversion targets rehabilitation and prevention of future criminality.
Outcome
Formal charges suspended; no criminal record after completion.
Significance: Diversion accommodates health-oriented interventions for substance offences.
6. Hovioikeus Helsinki 2019 – Cyberbullying / Online Harassment
Facts
16-year-old involved in online harassment of peer.
Diversion included apology, digital conduct training, and mediation with victim.
Court’s Reasoning
Programme aimed at preventing escalation and teaching responsibility.
Outcome
No prosecution; juvenile completed programme successfully.
Significance: Modern offences, including online behavior, can be addressed via diversion.
4. Key Takeaways from Finnish Case Law
Early, voluntary intervention is central to juvenile diversion.
Restorative components (apology, restitution) are emphasized.
Counselling and education address underlying social or behavioral issues.
Successful completion generally prevents a criminal record.
Diversion works for minor property, assault, substance, and online offenses.
Courts prioritize rehabilitation over punishment, reflecting Finland’s restorative justice approach.
RELATED Blog
comments