Victim Rights And Compensation
🏛️ I. Introduction: Victim Rights and Compensation in India
Traditionally, the Indian criminal justice system focused on the state as the complainant and prosecution. Victims often had a secondary role, mainly as witnesses. Over time, reforms have recognized victim rights, ensuring they:
Receive fair treatment during the investigation and trial.
Have access to compensation for loss, injury, or trauma.
Can be informed of their rights and participate in proceedings.
Key legislative sources:
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973: Sections 357, 357A, 41A, 53A
Code of Civil Procedure & Law of Torts – For civil remedies
Victim Compensation Schemes – Funded by the State under Section 357A CrPC
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012 – Special provisions for child victims
⚖️ II. Key Victim Rights in India
Right to Information: Victims must be informed of case status, arrests, and hearings.
Right to Protection: Safeguards against intimidation, harassment, or secondary victimization.
Right to Participation: Victims can submit impact statements and be heard in court.
Right to Compensation: Monetary relief for medical treatment, rehabilitation, or loss of earning capacity.
Right to Restitution: Offender may be ordered to compensate victim directly.
Section 357 CrPC: Enables courts to direct offenders to pay compensation.
Section 357A CrPC: State Victim Compensation Scheme for cases like rape, acid attacks, and trafficking.
💡 III. Landmark Case Laws
1. Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) – Acid Attack Victims
Facts:
Acid attack victim sought compensation and legal recognition of victim rights. The victim’s plea highlighted that the state was not providing adequate rehabilitation or support.
Held:
Supreme Court recognized victim’s right to rehabilitation, medical treatment, and legal aid.
Directed states to provide immediate interim compensation for acid attack victims.
Emphasized that victims are not mere witnesses; they have autonomous rights under law.
Principle Established:
👉 State is responsible for prompt compensation and victim rehabilitation.
2. Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India (1995) 1 SCC 14
Facts:
Victims of sexual harassment and assault approached the Court demanding stronger protection and enforcement of rights.
Held:
Court ruled that victims have a right to privacy, dignity, and safety.
Established that victim testimony and rights must be treated with care to prevent re-traumatization.
Principle Established:
👉 Victim rights include protection from secondary victimization and dignity preservation.
3. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
Facts:
The case involved sentencing in capital punishment cases but also discussed the role of victim impact in determining punishment.
Held:
Supreme Court held that victim impact statements should be considered during sentencing, especially in heinous crimes.
Court recognized psychological and emotional impact on victims.
Principle Established:
👉 Victim perspective and harm are relevant factors in sentencing.
4. Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746
Facts:
Mother of a deceased custodial victim claimed compensation for her son’s death in police custody.
Held:
Supreme Court awarded monetary compensation for violation of human rights.
Recognized right to compensation as a facet of Article 21 (Right to Life).
State held liable for negligence or misconduct.
Principle Established:
👉 Compensation can be granted for state negligence leading to harm to victims.
5. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) 2 SCC 384
Facts:
Custodial death case where victim’s family demanded compensation.
Held:
Court reiterated the principle in Nilabati Behera, emphasizing prompt and adequate compensation.
Victim compensation is not just for economic loss but also for mental trauma.
Principle Established:
👉 Victim compensation is part of delivering justice, independent of criminal prosecution.
6. Delhi High Court – Criminal Appeal: State v. Sanjay (2010)
Facts:
Victim of sexual assault filed application seeking compensation under Section 357A.
Held:
Court directed the State to provide interim compensation immediately without waiting for conviction.
Recognized victims’ right to quick financial relief under law.
Principle Established:
👉 Victims can receive compensation even before trial conclusion to meet urgent needs.
7. Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar (1985) 2 SCC 270
Facts:
Victim challenged improper legal process affecting her rights in criminal proceedings.
Held:
Supreme Court ruled that victims must have proper notice and opportunity to participate in trial, especially in cases like sexual assault.
Courts must ensure procedural justice for victims.
Principle Established:
👉 Procedural rights of victims are part of fair trial standards.
🧩 IV. Summary Table: Victim Rights and Case Law
| Victim Right | Leading Case | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|
| Right to compensation & rehabilitation | Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) | State must provide interim and permanent support |
| Right to dignity & protection | Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum (1995) | Prevent secondary victimization |
| Victim impact in sentencing | Bachan Singh (1980) | Emotional & psychological harm considered |
| Compensation for custodial harm | Nilabati Behera (1993) | Right to compensation under Article 21 |
| State liability for custodial death | State v. Gurmit Singh (1996) | Prompt & adequate compensation |
| Interim compensation before trial | State v. Sanjay (2010) | Immediate relief can be granted |
| Procedural rights & participation | Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar (1985) | Victims must have fair trial rights |
✅ V. Conclusion
Victim rights in India have evolved to include:
Protection, dignity, and fair treatment during trial.
Right to information and participation.
Compensation and rehabilitation, including interim relief.
Consideration of victim impact in sentencing.
Judicial activism and statutory reforms (CrPC Sections 357/357A, POCSO, Motor Vehicle Act, etc.) have ensured that victims are no longer ignored by the criminal justice system, and their rights are legally enforceable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments