Offences Against The State
I. Introduction
Offences against the state are crimes that threaten the security, sovereignty, or integrity of a country. Such offences are taken very seriously since they jeopardize the very foundation of the state and public order.
In India, these offences are primarily governed under:
Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Sections 121 to 130.
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA).
Various other statutes relating to sedition, terrorism, and unlawful assemblies.
II. Key Offences Under IPC
1. Section 121 IPC: Waging War Against the Government of India
Punishment: Death or life imprisonment, and fine.
Covers waging or attempting to wage war against the Government of India.
Very serious offence affecting the sovereignty.
2. Section 121A IPC: Conspiracy to Wage War
Punishment: Imprisonment up to life.
Covers conspiracy or attempt to wage war, even if war not actually waged.
3. Section 122 IPC: Collecting Arms etc. to Wage War
Punishment: Imprisonment up to life.
Focuses on collecting arms or men with intent to wage war.
4. Section 124A IPC: Sedition
Punishment: Imprisonment up to life.
Any act that brings or attempts to bring hatred, contempt, or excitement against the government.
5. Section 130 IPC: Assisting Enemies
Punishment: Death or life imprisonment.
Covers aiding or assisting an enemy at war.
III. Detailed Case Laws
1. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) 3 SCR 769
Facts:
The petitioner was charged under Section 124A (sedition) for speeches that allegedly incited hatred against the government.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 124A but restricted its scope to acts involving incitement to violence or public disorder. Mere criticism of government or expressions of dissatisfaction are not sedition.
Significance:
Laid down the test of “incitement to violence” as essential to sedition and protected free speech.
2. Bhagat Singh v. State (1930) 2 MPLJ 129
Facts:
Bhagat Singh and associates were charged with waging war against the British Government for revolutionary activities.
Held:
The court convicted them under Section 121 (waging war) and Section 302 (murder).
Significance:
Historical case exemplifying the application of waging war against the state.
3. State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (2003) 4 SCC 601
Facts:
Conspiracy to wage war by inciting armed revolt against the state.
Held:
Supreme Court held that conspiracy under Section 121A requires clear intention and overt acts toward waging war.
Significance:
Clarified that mere discussion or planning without overt act does not amount to conspiracy.
4. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950) SCR 594
Facts:
Freedom of press was challenged in the context of national security.
Held:
Supreme Court emphasized the importance of free speech unless it incites violence or public disorder.
Significance:
Protected free speech against state restrictions except in exceptional cases.
5. Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb (2018) 11 SCC 1
Facts:
Involved prosecution under UAPA for terrorist activities threatening state security.
Held:
Supreme Court held that UAPA provisions must be strictly interpreted, and courts must ensure that evidence is sufficient before depriving liberty.
Significance:
Balanced anti-terror laws with protection of civil liberties.
6. Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh & Anr. v. State of Gujarat (2004) 4 SCC 158
Facts:
Cases involving mass riots and incitement to violence against the state.
Held:
Court held that incitement to hatred or violence threatening public order can amount to offence against the state.
Significance:
Expanded understanding of offences threatening public order as offences against the state.
IV. Other Statutory Provisions
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967:
Deals with unlawful activities and terrorism threatening sovereignty.
Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) (repealed):
Previously addressed terror offences against the state.
Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA):
Gives special powers in disturbed areas.
V. Summary Table
| Offence | Section | Punishment | Essentials |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waging War | 121 | Death or life imprisonment | Actual waging or attempting to wage war |
| Conspiracy to Wage War | 121A | Life imprisonment | Agreement and overt act to wage war |
| Sedition | 124A | Imprisonment up to life | Incitement to violence or public disorder |
| Collecting Arms for War | 122 | Imprisonment up to life | Collecting arms or men with intent to wage war |
| Assisting Enemy | 130 | Death or life imprisonment | Helping enemy at war |
VI. Conclusion
Offences against the state are among the most serious criminal offences and are meant to protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India. The courts have balanced these offences with constitutional safeguards for free speech and liberty, limiting state action to cases involving violence, conspiracy, or actual threat to national security.
RELATED Blog
0 comments