Acquittal Vs. Discharge Appeals
Basic Definitions
Acquittal:
A formal legal judgment that the accused is not guilty of the charges. It means the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused is freed and the case is dismissed.
Discharge:
The accused is released either conditionally or absolutely before a full trial or conviction. Discharge may be granted if the prosecution evidence is insufficient or the offence is minor, often used to avoid unnecessary trials.
Appeals: Overview
Appeal Against Acquittal:
The prosecution or state may appeal an acquittal to a higher court if it believes the acquittal was erroneous in law or fact.
Appeal Against Discharge:
Typically, the prosecution can appeal against a discharge if they believe the magistrate or trial court erred in law or abused discretion in discharging the accused.
Differences Between Acquittal and Discharge Appeals
| Aspect | Acquittal | Discharge |
|---|---|---|
| Stage | After full trial, accused found not guilty | Usually before full trial or conviction |
| Effect | Final judgment of innocence | Release without conviction; case may continue |
| Appeal | Prosecution can appeal in many jurisdictions | Prosecution can appeal to set aside discharge |
| Scope of Review | Often wide, reviewing evidence and law | Review whether discharge was lawful and proper |
Detailed Case Law Analysis
1. R v. Jogee [2016] UKSC 8
Topic: Appeal against acquittal – joint liability and complicity
Facts:
Jogee was acquitted of murder charges on the basis that mere presence was insufficient for joint liability. The prosecution appealed.
Held:
The UK Supreme Court allowed the prosecution appeal and clarified the law on joint liability, overruling earlier precedent.
Principle:
Prosecution can appeal acquittals on errors of law. Appeals can correct misunderstandings affecting acquittals.
2. Regina v. Lucas [1981] AC 115
Topic: Appeal against discharge by magistrate
Facts:
The magistrate discharged Lucas without full trial due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution appealed.
Held:
The House of Lords held that the appellate court can interfere if the magistrate improperly discharged the accused despite sufficient evidence.
Principle:
Discharge appeals ensure magistrates don’t misuse discretion to prevent prosecution of legitimate cases.
3. R v. Taylor and Taylor (1993) 96 Cr App R 207
Topic: Appeal against acquittal based on insufficient evidence
Facts:
Defendants acquitted on insufficient evidence; prosecution appealed.
Held:
The Court of Appeal ruled that it cannot substitute its own view for jury’s but can interfere where no reasonable jury could have acquitted.
Principle:
Appeal courts are cautious but may quash acquittals if evidence clearly points to guilt.
4. DPP v. Humphrys [1987] Crim LR 88
Topic: Appeal against discharge by magistrate on no case to answer
Facts:
Magistrates discharged accused at close of prosecution case, believing no case to answer. DPP appealed.
Held:
Appeal court set aside discharge, holding magistrates must consider evidence carefully before discharging.
Principle:
Discharge is not automatic; sufficient evidence must be weighed properly.
5. R v. Garrison [2002] EWCA Crim 2699
Topic: Appeal against acquittal for misdirection of jury
Facts:
Defendant acquitted due to misdirection by trial judge. Prosecution appealed.
Held:
Court allowed appeal, quashing acquittal for legal error.
Principle:
Acquittals can be overturned on appeal if trial judge erred on law or misdirected the jury.
6. R v. Evans [1995] 1 WLR 476
Topic: Appeal against discharge of accused
Facts:
Accused discharged by magistrate for lack of evidence. Prosecution appealed.
Held:
Court held discharge was wrongly granted; evidence sufficed to call for trial.
Principle:
Prosecution may appeal discharge to ensure cases with evidence proceed to trial.
7. R v. Pierre [2019] EWCA Crim 2111
Topic: Appeal against acquittal – fresh evidence
Facts:
Defendant acquitted. New evidence emerged later. Prosecution applied to appeal.
Held:
Court allowed appeal in interests of justice based on fresh evidence.
Principle:
Appeals against acquittal may be allowed for fresh evidence changing the case’s complexion.
Summary of Legal Principles
| Case | Topic | Principle |
|---|---|---|
| R v. Jogee | Appeal against acquittal | Prosecution can appeal legal errors in acquittal |
| Regina v. Lucas | Appeal against discharge | Appellate court can set aside improper discharge |
| R v. Taylor and Taylor | Appeal on sufficiency | Acquittals set aside if no reasonable jury could acquit |
| DPP v. Humphrys | Discharge on no case | Discharge requires careful evidence consideration |
| R v. Garrison | Appeal for misdirection | Acquittal quashed if trial judge misdirected jury |
| R v. Evans | Appeal against discharge | Prosecution can appeal discharges where trial should proceed |
| R v. Pierre | Appeal with fresh evidence | Fresh evidence may justify appeal against acquittal |
Conclusion
Acquittal appeals generally focus on correcting errors in law or misapplication of evidence after a full trial.
Discharge appeals ensure that accused persons are not prematurely or wrongly discharged, allowing cases with sufficient evidence to proceed.
Courts balance the finality of acquittals against the need to prevent miscarriages of justice.
Appeals against discharge preserve the integrity of the prosecution process, ensuring cases are not dismissed without proper consideration.
RELATED Blog
0 comments