Personal Injury Fraud Prosecutions
1. What is Personal Injury Fraud?
Personal Injury Fraud involves making false or exaggerated claims for compensation following an injury, often through:
Faking accidents or injuries
Exaggerating the severity of genuine injuries
Colluding with medical professionals or claim handlers
Submitting fraudulent evidence or documents
This type of fraud is common in insurance claims, workplace injury compensation, and road traffic accident claims, causing substantial financial losses to insurers and public bodies.
2. Legal Framework
Fraud Act 2006
Section 2: Fraud by false representation
Section 3: Fraud by failing to disclose information
Section 4: Fraud by abuse of position
Theft Act 1968 (where property or money is obtained dishonestly)
Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (for attempted fraud)
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) (confiscation of proceeds)
3. Key Elements of the Offence
False or misleading representations about an injury or accident
Intent to gain financially (insurance payout or compensation)
Dishonest conduct, including fabricating evidence or staging incidents
4. Case Law Examples
Case 1: R v. Jason Green (2017)
Facts:
Green staged a slip-and-fall accident at a supermarket.
Made exaggerated claims of severe back injuries.
Medical records and CCTV were scrutinised.
Charges:
Fraud by false representation (Fraud Act 2006)
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Ordered to repay compensation.
Significance:
Demonstrated how CCTV evidence can disprove fraudulent claims.
Case 2: R v. Claire Mitchell (2019)
Facts:
Mitchell claimed compensation for a whiplash injury from a car accident.
Medical reports were forged to exaggerate the injury.
She colluded with a medical professional.
Charges:
Fraud by false representation
Conspiracy to defraud
Outcome:
Both sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Medical professional lost licence.
Significance:
Highlighted insider collusion increasing seriousness of offence.
Case 3: R v. Ahmed Khan (2016)
Facts:
Khan submitted fake receipts and witness statements to claim compensation for a workplace injury.
No actual injury occurred.
Charges:
Fraud by false representation
Outcome:
Sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.
Significance:
Illustrated that documentary fraud to support false claims is prosecutable.
Case 4: R v. Sarah Evans (2020)
Facts:
Evans faked a disability to claim Personal Independence Payment (PIP).
Used fabricated medical evidence and staged incidents to demonstrate disability.
Charges:
Fraud by false representation
Outcome:
Sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Ordered to repay benefits.
Significance:
Showed the extension of personal injury fraud to social security claims.
Case 5: R v. Michael Johnson (2018)
Facts:
Johnson was involved in a staged car collision with an accomplice.
Both made exaggerated injury claims to insurance companies.
Charges:
Fraud by false representation
Conspiracy to defraud
Outcome:
Sentenced to 4 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Emphasised the serious consequences of organised staged accidents.
Case 6: R v. Rebecca Adams (2021)
Facts:
Adams claimed a severe psychological injury from a minor accident.
Medical reports were deliberately falsified.
Charges:
Fraud by false representation
Outcome:
Sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Courts recognise fraudulent psychological injury claims as serious.
5. Sentencing Considerations
Scale of financial loss to insurers or public bodies
Degree of planning or organisation
Whether the fraud involved collusion with professionals
Impact on genuine claimants and the insurance system
Previous convictions for fraud
Sentences typically range from 18 months to 4 years, depending on circumstances.
6. Challenges in Prosecution
Distinguishing between genuine and exaggerated injuries, especially psychological
Gathering medical and forensic evidence to counter false claims
Proving dishonesty beyond reasonable doubt
Dealing with accomplices and professionals involved in collusion
7. Conclusion
Personal injury fraud undermines the insurance system, increasing premiums for everyone. UK courts take a firm stance against it, prosecuting both individuals and organised rings involved in false claims. Evidence such as CCTV, medical reports, and witness testimony is critical in securing convictions, with offenders facing significant custodial sentences and financial penalties.
RELATED Blog
0 comments