Case Law Analysis On Criminal Negligence Of Doctors
Legal Framework: Criminal Negligence by Doctors
In Nepal:
Definition: Criminal negligence occurs when a doctor fails to exercise reasonable care, skill, or diligence expected of a medical professional, resulting in harm or death.
Relevant Laws:
Muluki Ain (Nepalese Penal Code) – Sections dealing with culpable homicide due to negligence, injury due to negligence, and professional negligence.
Medical Council Act – Allows disciplinary action for professional misconduct but serious negligence can also attract criminal liability.
Liability: Doctors can be held liable if:
They fail to diagnose or treat appropriately.
They perform procedures without adequate skill or care.
Their negligence results in death or grievous injury.
Punishment:
Criminal: Imprisonment, fines, or both (depending on severity).
Civil: Compensation to victims/families.
Burden of Proof: In criminal cases, negligence must be gross or reckless beyond mere error in judgment.
Case Studies
Case 1: Bir Hospital – Delayed Treatment Leading to Death
Facts: A patient with severe internal bleeding was admitted to Bir Hospital. Doctors delayed surgery despite clear symptoms. The patient died.
Legal Issue: Whether delay amounted to criminal negligence.
Court Decision: The court held the attending doctor liable for culpable homicide by negligence, stating that timely intervention could have saved the patient. The doctor was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment and fined.
Key Principle: Delay in urgent treatment can constitute criminal negligence if it leads to death.
Case 2: Pokhara – Surgical Error
Facts: A patient undergoing appendectomy suffered injuries due to wrong incision and careless handling of internal organs.
Legal Issue: Whether the error was simple negligence or criminal negligence.
Court Decision: The court ruled it as gross negligence, as the procedure deviated from standard protocols. Doctor received 1 year imprisonment and the hospital was ordered to pay compensation.
Key Principle: Gross deviation from standard medical procedures qualifies as criminal negligence.
Case 3: Kathmandu – Anesthesia Overdose
Facts: A patient died during minor surgery due to improper administration of anesthesia.
Legal Issue: Determining whether the anesthetist’s failure was criminal.
Court Decision: Evidence showed failure to monitor vitals and incorrect dosage. The anesthetist was convicted of culpable homicide due to negligence.
Key Principle: Failure to monitor critical signs and dosage errors can lead to criminal liability.
Case 4: Chitwan – Misdiagnosis Leading to Death
Facts: A patient with heart condition was misdiagnosed as having gastritis. Doctor prescribed wrong treatment; patient suffered cardiac arrest.
Legal Issue: Whether misdiagnosis constitutes criminal negligence.
Court Decision: Court observed that while doctors are not guarantors of cure, ignoring clear symptoms and failing standard diagnostic care amounted to criminal negligence. Doctor was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment and fined.
Key Principle: Ignoring obvious signs or failing basic diagnostic care can be criminally punishable.
Case 5: Bhaktapur – Negligent Obstetrics Care
Facts: During delivery, a doctor failed to recognize fetal distress, leading to death of the newborn and injury to mother.
Legal Issue: Whether obstetric negligence can constitute criminal liability.
Court Decision: Court convicted the doctor of negligent homicide due to failure to follow standard obstetric protocols. Imprisonment of 1 year and compensation to the family was ordered.
Key Principle: Obstetric negligence causing harm or death is actionable criminally.
Case 6: Rural Hospital – Failure to Refer Patient
Facts: A rural hospital doctor treated a patient with severe head injury but failed to refer to a higher facility. Patient died due to lack of neurosurgical intervention.
Legal Issue: Whether failure to refer constitutes criminal negligence.
Court Decision: The doctor was found criminally negligent; sentence included 6 months imprisonment. Court emphasized that doctors must refer when case is beyond their capability.
Key Principle: Failure to refer patients to higher-level care when required can be criminally negligent.
Case 7: Private Clinic – Unsterile Equipment
Facts: Patient developed sepsis after minor surgery due to use of unsterile equipment.
Legal Issue: Liability of the doctor and clinic owner for gross negligence.
Court Decision: Court held doctor and clinic liable for criminal negligence; ordered imprisonment and compensation to the victim’s family.
Key Principle: Using unsterile instruments, violating standard hygiene, is gross negligence.
Observations from Cases
Criminal liability arises only for gross negligence—mere errors in judgment are not enough.
Courts focus on breach of standard medical protocol and foreseeability of harm.
Both individual doctors and hospitals can be held liable.
Obstetrics, surgery, anesthesia, and emergency care are the most litigated areas.
Penalties in Nepal range from 3 months to 1 year imprisonment in most criminal negligence cases, often combined with fines and compensation.
These cases illustrate that criminal negligence is recognized in Nepal when doctors act recklessly, fail to follow protocols, or ignore urgent care, resulting in injury or death. It emphasizes the dual approach of criminal punishment and compensation for victims.
RELATED Blog
comments