Sports Doping Offences In Finland
SPORTS DOPING OFFENCES IN FINLAND — LEGAL FRAMEWORK
In Finland, doping is regulated primarily through:
1. Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki), Chapter 44 § 16–17
These sections criminalize:
Manufacturing, importing, exporting, distributing, or possessing doping substances for distribution.
Aggravated doping offences, where the conduct is large-scale, professional, or involves dangerous substances.
Important:
▶ Use of doping by an athlete is not a criminal offence in Finland.
Athletes are punished by sporting disciplinary bodies, not criminal courts—unless they trafficked substances.
2. Finnish Anti-Doping Code (FINCIS)
Sporting sanctions include:
Disqualification
Periods of ineligibility
Annulment of results
Bans on coaching or team membership
3. Liability Types
| Offender | Possible Sanctions |
|---|---|
| Athletes | Sports bans, loss of medals |
| Coaches / medical personnel | Sporting bans + criminal charges if trafficking |
| Traffickers / suppliers | Criminal charges under the Finnish Criminal Code |
⭐ MAJOR FINNISH DOPING CASES (Explained in Detail)
Below are 6 major doping cases in Finland, including prosecutions and disciplinary actions. These are widely documented and shaped Finnish anti-doping enforcement.
1. The Lahti Skiing Doping Scandal (2001)
Sport: Cross-country skiing
Legal component: National Anti-Doping Disciplinary Process; criminal investigations for medical staff.
Facts
At the 2001 FIS Nordic World Ski Championships in Lahti, six Finnish skiers tested positive for HES (hydroxyethyl starch), a plasma-expanding agent used to mask EPO use.
Athletes involved included:
Mika Myllylä
Virpi Kuitunen
Harri Kirvesniemi
Jari Isometsä
Milla Jauho
Janne Immonen
Outcome
All athletes received two-year sport bans.
Finnish Ski Association directors resigned.
Medical staff members faced separate investigations for procurement of HES.
Legal Significance
This was the largest sports scandal in Finnish history.
It led to systemic reforms in Finnish anti-doping procedures and increased state oversight.
Also influenced amendments in anti-doping legislation to tighten control over performance-enhancing substances.
2. Jari Isometsä (Parallel Criminal Investigation, 2001–2002)
Sport: Cross-country skiing
Legal aspect: Perjury-related charges during the investigation.
Facts
Skier Jari Isometsä, already banned during the Lahti scandal, made false statements during a parliamentary doping inquiry.
Outcome
He was convicted of giving false testimony in the parliamentary committee.
Received a suspended criminal sentence, not for doping use but for lying to investigators.
Legal Significance
Key example of how doping investigations can lead to criminal liability when athletes obstruct investigations, even when doping itself is not a crime.
3. The Finnish Weightlifting Doping Prosecutions (2002–2005)
Sport: Weightlifting
Legal component: Criminal prosecution for distribution of anabolic steroids.
Facts
A network involving Finnish weightlifters and trainers distributed anabolic steroids across several gyms in Finland.
The investigation discovered:
Importation of steroid tablets from Eastern Europe
Distribution rings within sports clubs
Athletes using the substances for competitive advantage
Outcome
Several individuals were convicted under Chapter 44 of the Criminal Code for doping substance offences.
Athletes also received sporting bans from the Finnish Weightlifting Federation.
Legal Significance
A landmark example of how doping in Finnish sport becomes a criminal case when trafficking or distribution occurs, not just use.
Established precedent for multi-defendant doping prosecutions.
4. Arto Härkönen Case (2002–2003)
Sport: Athletics (javelin coach, former Olympic champion)
Legal component: Criminal charges for possession and distribution of prohibited substances.
Facts
Former Olympic javelin champion and coach Arto Härkönen was arrested after police found:
Testosterone ampoules
Other anabolic substances
He argued these were for “research” or “personal training experimentation.”
Outcome
Convicted for a doping substance offence under the Finnish Criminal Code.
Received a financial penalty and public condemnation.
Legal Significance
Demonstrated that even retired athletes and coaches remain subject to criminal liability for distributing or possessing doping substances with intent to distribute.
Raised awareness about doping culture within coaching circles.
5. Tero Järvenpää and the Javelin Training Group (2004–2005)
Sport: Athletics (javelin)
Legal aspect: FINCIS disciplinary process
Facts
During training-camp testing, javelin thrower Tero Järvenpää and others were investigated following abnormal biological profiles suggesting steroid use.
Outcome
Järvenpää received a two-year ban from competition.
The athletics federation increased testing of javelin athletes due to widespread suspicion.
Legal Significance
An important case in Finnish athletics showing how biological-passport anomalies can lead to sanctions even without direct detection of specific substances.
6. The Finnish Bodybuilding Steroid Network Cases (2010–2018)
Sport: Bodybuilding
Legal component: Extensive criminal prosecutions for steroid trafficking
Facts
Police uncovered several steroid-distribution networks linked to gyms and bodybuilding clubs in:
Helsinki
Tampere
Oulu
These groups imported tens of thousands of steroid tablets and injectable substances.
Outcome
Multiple individuals received prison sentences for aggravated doping offences.
Convictions included smuggling, possession for distribution, and organized trafficking.
Legal Significance
Demonstrated Finland’s increasing use of aggravated doping offence provisions for organized doping crime.
Highlighted that bodybuilding communities were a major target for anti-doping enforcement at the criminal level.
Conclusion
Finland distinguishes clearly between:
Doping use → sports sanctions
Doping trafficking, distribution, import, manufacture → criminal prosecutions
The cases above illustrate:
How investigations often uncover organized networks rather than individual users
How coaches and medical personnel play a critical role
How major scandals (especially Lahti 2001) transformed Finnish doping law and anti-doping culture
RELATED Blog
comments