Criminalization Of Mob Lynching In India
⚖️ Legal Framework (Before Criminalization)
Historically, India did not have a separate law for mob lynching. Such incidents were prosecuted under general provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), such as:
Section 302 – Murder
Section 307 – Attempt to murder
Section 147/148/149 – Rioting, unlawful assembly
Section 295A – Deliberate acts to outrage religious feelings
Section 153A – Promoting enmity between different groups
However, due to the rising frequency and communal nature of mob lynchings, the Supreme Court and various state governments started pushing for specific anti-lynching laws.
🔍 Supreme Court Landmark: Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India (2018)
This was a watershed case in the context of mob lynching.
The petitioner highlighted the increasing incidents of cow-vigilante and mob lynching violence.
Judgment: The SC condemned such acts and held that mobocracy cannot be allowed in a civilized society.
Guidelines Issued:
Each state must appoint a nodal officer to prevent mob lynching.
Fast-track courts for lynching cases.
Victim compensation schemes to be implemented.
States were directed to formulate special laws against lynching.
This case paved the way for states like Manipur, Rajasthan, and West Bengal to introduce dedicated anti-lynching laws.
🧑⚖️ Important Mob Lynching Cases in India
Here are five major mob lynching cases with detailed background and legal developments:
1. Mohammad Akhlaq Lynching Case (2015, Uttar Pradesh)
Facts:
Akhlaq, a resident of Dadri in UP, was lynched by a mob over rumors of storing and consuming beef.
A mob of over 100 people entered his house and killed him.
His son was critically injured.
Legal Outcome:
18 people were charged under IPC Section 302 (murder), 147/148/149 (rioting with deadly weapons).
The case sparked national and international outrage, raising questions over religious intolerance and cow vigilantism.
As of now, the trial is still ongoing, and no final conviction has been made.
Significance:
This was one of the first major lynching cases in recent years and brought the term “mob lynching” into the national discourse.
2. Pehlu Khan Lynching Case (2017, Rajasthan)
Facts:
Pehlu Khan, a dairy farmer from Haryana, was lynched near Alwar, Rajasthan.
He was transporting cows with valid documents when cow vigilantes attacked him.
He succumbed to injuries two days later.
Legal Outcome:
Six accused were acquitted in 2019 due to lack of evidence, despite video footage.
A re-investigation was ordered after public outcry.
Rajasthan Government passed the Rajasthan Protection from Lynching Act, 2019 partly due to this case.
Significance:
It highlighted biases in investigations, witness tampering, and the failure of police to protect the victim.
3. Junaid Khan Lynching (2017, Haryana)
Facts:
Junaid Khan, 15, was stabbed and killed on a train after a communal argument escalated.
He and his brothers were called "anti-nationals" and accused of carrying beef.
The attack took place in front of unresponsive passengers and railway staff.
Legal Outcome:
One accused was arrested and charged under IPC Sections 302, 153A, and 295A.
Bail was granted in 2018, and the trial is ongoing.
Significance:
This case reflected how public apathy and communal hatred can intersect tragically.
4. Alimuddin Ansari Lynching (2017, Jharkhand)
Facts:
Alimuddin was lynched in Ramgarh, Jharkhand, on suspicion of carrying beef in his car.
A BJP worker was allegedly involved in the attack.
Legal Outcome:
A fast-track court convicted 11 people, including the BJP worker.
They were sentenced to life imprisonment in 2018.
Later, some were granted bail by the Jharkhand High Court.
Significance:
This was one of the rare cases where convictions were quickly secured, sending a strong message against lynching.
5. Tabrez Ansari Lynching (2019, Jharkhand)
Facts:
Tabrez was tied to a pole, beaten for hours, and forced to chant "Jai Shri Ram."
He died four days later in custody due to head injuries.
The police were accused of deliberate medical negligence.
Legal Outcome:
Initially, murder charges (Section 302) were diluted to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304), sparking outrage.
Following public pressure, the original murder charges were restored.
Trial is ongoing.
Significance:
Showed how institutional failure – by police, medical staff, and judiciary – can protect the perpetrators.
📜 State-Level Laws on Mob Lynching
Following the Supreme Court’s 2018 judgment, some states passed dedicated laws:
🔹 Rajasthan: Rajasthan Protection from Lynching Act, 2019
Punishment up to life imprisonment for mob lynching.
Victim compensation, fast-track trials, and rehabilitation measures included.
🔹 West Bengal: West Bengal (Prevention of Lynching) Act, 2019
Mob lynching punishable with death or life imprisonment in extreme cases.
Creates a nodal officer and enforces strict liability on officials.
🔹 Manipur: The Manipur Protection from Mob Violence Act, 2018
Inspired by SC guidelines, it criminalizes lynching and mandates preventive action by the state.
However, India still lacks a central anti-lynching law, despite calls by civil society and recommendations from the Law Commission.
📌 Conclusion
Mob lynching in India is not just a law-and-order issue—it reflects deep-rooted social, religious, and political tensions. While general provisions of the IPC have been used to prosecute such cases, specific legislation is essential to:
Recognize mob lynching as a distinct crime.
Hold public officials accountable.
Ensure swift justice and deterrence.
Until a central law is enacted, the efforts of individual states and pressure from the judiciary will remain crucial in combating this form of vigilante violence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments