Home Healthcare Fraud Prosecutions
Home Healthcare Fraud Prosecutions: Overview
Home healthcare fraud typically involves schemes to defraud government healthcare programs (such as Medicare and Medicaid) or private insurers through false billing, kickbacks, unneeded services, or billing for services not rendered. Given the increasing reliance on home healthcare, these frauds significantly impact healthcare costs and patient safety.
Key Federal Laws Involved:
The False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733: Prohibits submission of false or fraudulent claims to the government.
The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b): Prohibits payments or receiving remuneration to induce referrals of federally funded healthcare business.
Health Care Fraud Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1347: Criminalizes schemes to defraud healthcare benefit programs.
Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343: Often used in cases involving fraudulent communications.
The Stark Law (Physician Self-Referral Law), 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn: Restricts physician referrals where there is a financial relationship.
Detailed Case Law on Home Healthcare Fraud Prosecutions
1. United States v. Allcare Home Health Services, Inc. (2015)
Facts:
Allcare Home Health Services was accused of billing Medicare for unnecessary home health visits and inflating service times.
Charges:
Violations of the False Claims Act.
Health care fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1347.
Outcome:
The company agreed to pay $10 million to settle.
Several executives faced individual criminal charges.
Significance:
Demonstrates the government's aggressive civil and criminal enforcement in home health billing fraud.
Emphasizes FCA’s role in recovering millions from fraudulent providers.
2. United States v. Dorothea Johnson (2013)
Facts:
Johnson, a home healthcare nurse, was charged with submitting false claims by billing for visits she never made.
Charges:
Health care fraud.
False claims.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 3 years in prison.
Ordered to pay restitution to Medicare.
Significance:
Highlights individual provider liability.
Shows personal accountability for falsifying patient care records.
3. United States v. Kenneth DaSilva (2016)
Facts:
DaSilva owned multiple home health agencies and orchestrated a scheme to pay kickbacks to recruiters for patient referrals.
Charges:
Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Health care fraud.
Conspiracy.
Outcome:
Pleaded guilty.
Sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Reinforces prohibition against kickbacks in home healthcare.
Reflects government’s focus on dismantling fraudulent referral networks.
4. United States v. Hope Health Care Services (2017)
Facts:
Hope Health Care was prosecuted for billing Medicare for services not rendered or provided by unlicensed individuals.
Charges:
False claims.
Health care fraud.
Outcome:
Settled with the government for $25 million.
Company barred from Medicare participation for several years.
Significance:
Demonstrates large financial settlements in civil fraud cases.
Shows regulatory consequences, including exclusion from government programs.
5. United States v. Linda Thompson (2018)
Facts:
Thompson was a home health aide who billed Medicaid for hours of care she never provided.
Charges:
Health care fraud.
False claims.
Outcome:
Convicted after trial.
Sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Significance:
Reinforces prosecution of individual fraud perpetrators.
Highlights that even low-level employees can face criminal penalties.
6. United States v. LifeCare Home Health Services (2019)
Facts:
LifeCare was accused of submitting false claims by inflating therapy session times and billing for unneeded services.
Charges:
False claims.
Health care fraud.
Outcome:
Settled for $15 million.
Corporate integrity agreement implemented.
Significance:
Shows use of corporate integrity agreements to monitor compliance post-settlement.
Reflects significant monetary recoveries under the FCA.
Legal Elements in Home Healthcare Fraud Cases
Intent: Prosecutors must show the defendant knowingly submitted false claims or engaged in fraudulent conduct.
False Claims: Billing for services not provided, unnecessary services, or inflated service times.
Kickbacks: Offering or receiving payments to induce referrals violates federal law.
Conspiracy: Coordination among providers, recruiters, or billing agents to commit fraud.
Restitution: Courts often order repayment of the fraudulently obtained money.
Exclusion: Providers may be excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs.
Summary Table of Home Healthcare Fraud Cases
| Case | Year | Charges | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Allcare | 2015 | False Claims Act, health care fraud | $10 million settlement, criminal charges | Large-scale provider fraud |
| United States v. Dorothea Johnson | 2013 | Health care fraud, false claims | 3 years imprisonment | Individual provider accountability |
| United States v. Kenneth DaSilva | 2016 | Anti-kickback, conspiracy | 5 years imprisonment | Crackdown on referral kickbacks |
| United States v. Hope Health Care | 2017 | False claims, health care fraud | $25 million settlement, exclusion | Billing for unlicensed or nonexistent services |
| United States v. Linda Thompson | 2018 | Health care fraud, false claims | 18 months imprisonment | Low-level employee prosecution |
| United States v. LifeCare | 2019 | False claims, health care fraud | $15 million settlement | Use of corporate integrity agreements |
Conclusion
Home healthcare fraud prosecutions encompass both individual and corporate liability, targeting a wide range of fraudulent activities from false billing to kickbacks. The government aggressively uses civil and criminal statutes to recover funds and deter misconduct, often resulting in multi-million-dollar settlements and prison sentences.
RELATED Blog
0 comments