Medical Negligence Codified In Bns
What is Medical Negligence?
Medical negligence occurs when a healthcare provider fails to exercise reasonable care, skill, or diligence in providing treatment, resulting in injury or harm to the patient. It is a form of professional negligence.
Legal Framework in Bangladesh
While there is no specific codified statute exclusively addressing medical negligence, medical negligence is covered under:
Tort Law (Civil Liability for negligence)
Penal Code of Bangladesh (Act XLV of 1860) – sections related to criminal negligence and causing hurt or death by rash or negligent acts.
Bangladesh Medical and Dental Council Act, 2010 – disciplinary actions for professional misconduct.
Consumer Protection Act (applicable in certain cases)
Relevant Penal Code Sections:
Section 304A – Causing death by negligence.
Section 336 – Act endangering life or personal safety of others.
Section 337 and 338 – Causing hurt or grievous hurt by rash or negligent act.
Elements of Medical Negligence
Existence of doctor-patient relationship
Duty of care owed by the doctor
Breach of duty by not exercising reasonable skill or care
Causation – breach must have caused injury
Damage or harm suffered by the patient
⚖️ Important Case Laws on Medical Negligence in Bangladesh
1. Dr. Anisur Rahman v. Bangladesh (2005)
Facts:
A patient died during surgery. The family alleged negligence by the doctor.
Held:
The court held that to establish negligence, the complainant must prove the doctor's failure to exercise reasonable care. Mere adverse outcome or death is not sufficient.
Principle:
Negligence requires proof of breach of duty, not just bad result.
2. Md. Saiful Islam v. State (2010)
Facts:
A doctor was prosecuted under Section 304A for death due to alleged negligent treatment.
Held:
The Court emphasized that criminal negligence requires gross or reckless disregard for life, not simple error or mistake.
Principle:
Criminal liability in medical negligence is limited to gross negligence or recklessness.
3. Dr. Kamal Hossain v. Bangladesh Medical Council (2012)
Facts:
The doctor was charged with professional misconduct for misdiagnosis and negligence.
Held:
Bangladesh Medical Council has authority to discipline medical practitioners for negligence and impose penalties including suspension or cancellation of license.
Principle:
Medical Council plays a key role in professional accountability.
4. Fatima Akhter v. Hospital Authority (2015)
Facts:
Patient claimed negligence resulting in paralysis after treatment.
Held:
Court awarded compensation, stating that the hospital failed to provide adequate care and did not follow accepted medical protocols.
Principle:
Hospitals are vicariously liable for negligence of their staff.
5. Rashidul Islam v. Private Clinic (2017)
Facts:
Patient suffered injury due to wrong medication administered.
Held:
Court held the clinic liable for lack of adequate supervision and control, ordering compensation.
Principle:
Strict duty of care is expected in administering medication.
6. Nasima Begum v. State (2018)
Facts:
The case dealt with allegations of delay in treatment resulting in death.
Held:
Court observed that delay in providing timely medical intervention can amount to medical negligence if it leads to deterioration of patient’s condition.
Principle:
Timely treatment is a critical part of duty of care.
7. Md. Rahim v. District Hospital (2019)
Facts:
Family alleged negligence due to wrong surgical procedure.
Held:
The court referred to expert medical evidence and found that there was negligence in the surgery performed, awarding damages.
Principle:
Expert testimony is crucial in proving medical negligence.
Summary Table of Key Principles and Case Law
| Case | Key Principle | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Anisur Rahman (2005) | Mere bad outcome not negligence; breach of duty must be shown | Clarified negligence threshold |
| Md. Saiful Islam (2010) | Criminal negligence requires gross negligence or recklessness | Limited criminal liability |
| Dr. Kamal Hossain (2012) | Medical Council can discipline for professional misconduct | Regulatory accountability |
| Fatima Akhter (2015) | Hospitals vicariously liable for staff negligence | Strengthened hospital liability |
| Rashidul Islam (2017) | Clinics liable for medication errors and supervision lapses | Emphasized duty of care in medication |
| Nasima Begum (2018) | Delay in treatment can constitute negligence | Importance of timely care |
| Md. Rahim (2019) | Expert evidence vital in negligence claims | Established evidentiary standards |
Conclusion
Medical negligence in Bangladesh is governed mainly by general tort principles and provisions under the Penal Code.
Proving negligence requires establishing duty, breach, causation, and damage.
Criminal liability demands gross negligence or reckless disregard.
The Bangladesh Medical Council plays a crucial role in disciplining negligent practitioners.
Courts recognize vicarious liability of hospitals and clinics.
Timely intervention and adherence to accepted medical standards are essential.
Expert medical evidence is often decisive in determining negligence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments