Juvenile Courts Versus Tribal Justice Systems In Afghanistan
Juvenile Justice System in Afghanistan
Legal Framework and Structure
Afghanistan's juvenile justice system is outlined in the Law on the Organization and Jurisdiction of Courts, which mandates the establishment of juvenile primary courts in each province. These courts are designed to handle cases involving minors, typically under the age of 18. The system aims to provide rehabilitation rather than punishment, focusing on the reintegration of young offenders into society.
Challenges and Case Studies
Lack of Legal Representation
A study by the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) and UNICEF highlighted significant issues within the juvenile justice system. It was reported that only 8% of juveniles were informed of their rights upon arrest, and 56% had not voluntarily given their statements. Access to legal representation was limited, with only 23% of detainees having access to a lawyer during detention, and this increased to 38% during court proceedings Jurist.
Physical Abuse and Detention Conditions
Reports indicated that 48% of children experienced physical abuse during detention, and 58% reported falling ill while incarcerated. The conditions were particularly harsh for girls, many of whom were detained with adult female prisoners due to the lack of separate facilities The New Humanitarian.
Sahar Gul Case
Sahar Gul, a young Afghan girl, was subjected to severe abuse by her in-laws after being forced into marriage. Her case drew national and international attention. Initially, three of her abusers were convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison, but these convictions were overturned on appeal. Subsequently, after further legal proceedings, her husband and other perpetrators were convicted and sentenced to five years in prison Wikipedia.
Tribal Justice System (Jirga/Shura)
Principles and Practices
Tribal justice in Afghanistan is deeply rooted in Pashtunwali, a traditional code of conduct. Decisions are made by community elders through informal gatherings known as Jirgas or Shuras. These bodies handle disputes ranging from family matters to criminal offenses, often emphasizing reconciliation and restitution over punitive measures.
Case Studies
Mukhlis Ahmadzai Case
In the province of Paktia, Mukhlis Ahmadzai accidentally killed a child with his car. Instead of reporting the incident to the authorities, his family convened a Jirga. Through a traditional ritual called nanawati, which involves seeking forgiveness, the community absolved him of the crime. This case illustrates the community-based approach to justice, where restoration and forgiveness are prioritized RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty.
Forced Eviction in Ghor Province
In August 2024, the Taliban, in collaboration with the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, issued a decree for the forced eviction of approximately 600 families in the Dawlatyar district of Ghor province. This action violated ancestral land rights and overrode legal rulings, highlighting the intersection of state power and tribal authority in land disputes afghanistanjustice.org.
Comparative Analysis
| Aspect | Juvenile Justice System | Tribal Justice System (Jirga/Shura) |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Framework | State laws and regulations | Customary tribal laws (Pashtunwali) |
| Jurisdiction | Formal courts in provincial centers | Informal gatherings of community elders |
| Focus | Rehabilitation and reintegration | Reconciliation and restitution |
| Access to Legal Aid | Limited; often inadequate | Community-based support; varies by locality |
| Gender Sensitivity | Often lacks provisions for female detainees | Practices may vary; sometimes more lenient |
| Enforcement | State-run institutions and police | Community enforcement; may lack legal backing |
Conclusion
Both the juvenile justice system and tribal justice mechanisms in Afghanistan aim to address wrongdoing, but they operate on different principles and structures. The formal juvenile justice system is state-driven and focuses on legal procedures and rehabilitation, though it faces significant challenges such as limited legal representation and poor detention conditions. In contrast, the tribal justice system is community-based, emphasizing reconciliation and traditional practices, but it may lack consistency and legal safeguards. Understanding these systems is crucial for addressing justice issues in Afghanistan, especially concerning minors and marginalized groups.
RELATED Blog
0 comments