Dna Profiling In Criminal Cases
🔬 What is DNA Profiling?
DNA profiling (also called DNA fingerprinting) is a forensic technique used to identify individuals based on unique patterns in their DNA. It analyzes specific regions of DNA that vary highly among individuals but remain consistent in each person.
Used for identification and matching biological samples (blood, saliva, hair, semen) found at crime scenes.
Helps establish guilt or innocence by linking suspects to crimes.
Can exonerate the wrongly accused by proving absence of DNA match.
🧩 Process of DNA Profiling
Collection of Samples – From crime scene, victim, suspect, or others.
Extraction – Isolating DNA from cells.
Amplification – Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to replicate DNA segments.
Analysis – Comparing specific genetic markers (STRs – short tandem repeats).
Matching – Identifying if DNA profiles from different samples match.
⚖️ Legal Importance of DNA Profiling
Strong evidence in courts due to high reliability.
Helps reduce wrongful convictions.
Can solve cold cases.
Used alongside other evidence (eyewitness, circumstantial, forensic).
Key Indian and International Case Laws on DNA Profiling
1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (1996) – Supreme Court of India
Facts:
The case involved a gang rape.
DNA profiling was introduced as evidence to prove the identity of the accused.
Legal Significance:
Supreme Court accepted DNA evidence as admissible scientific evidence.
It was the first case in India where DNA profiling was used and accepted in the judicial process.
The court emphasized the importance of the Chain of Custody for DNA samples.
Outcome:
DNA evidence helped convict the accused.
Set precedent for the use of DNA evidence in Indian courts.
2. Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka (2010) – Supreme Court of India
Facts:
Concerned the use of polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain-mapping tests, but the ruling impacted DNA evidence as well.
Legal Significance:
Court held that scientific tests involving bodily samples require voluntary consent.
Emphasized that DNA collection must respect constitutional rights.
DNA profiling must be conducted following legal safeguards to prevent violation of privacy and bodily integrity.
Outcome:
DNA evidence admissible only if obtained without violating constitutional rights.
Protection against forced collection or misuse.
3. Ram Chander v. State of Haryana (2009) – Punjab and Haryana High Court
Facts:
Involved a rape case where the accused denied involvement.
DNA evidence was collected from the victim and the accused.
Legal Significance:
The court emphasized the importance of proper collection and preservation of DNA evidence.
Held that DNA profiling evidence should be treated as strong corroborative evidence.
DNA evidence was decisive in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Outcome:
The accused was convicted based on the DNA match.
Reaffirmed the role of DNA evidence in sexual assault cases.
4. The People of the State of California v. O.J. Simpson (1995) – U.S. Supreme Court
Facts:
Famous criminal trial where DNA evidence played a crucial role.
Simpson was accused of murder; DNA evidence linked him to the crime scene.
Legal Significance:
Highlighted both the power and challenges of DNA evidence.
Defense challenged DNA evidence due to alleged contamination and procedural flaws.
Demonstrated the importance of chain of custody and proper forensic procedures.
Outcome:
Despite DNA evidence, Simpson was acquitted (largely due to jury doubt on evidence handling).
Case emphasized the need for strict forensic standards.
5. People v. Wesley (1988) – Illinois Supreme Court, USA
Facts:
Wesley was accused of sexual assault.
DNA evidence introduced for the first time in a U.S. court.
Legal Significance:
First case in the U.S. where DNA profiling was admitted as evidence.
Validated scientific reliability of DNA testing.
Marked the beginning of DNA evidence becoming a routine part of criminal trials.
Outcome:
Wesley was convicted based on DNA match.
Opened the door for extensive use of DNA evidence in future trials.
⚖️ Summary: Importance and Challenges of DNA Profiling in Criminal Cases
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Strengths | High accuracy, individual-specific, helps identify perpetrators, exonerates innocent |
| Limitations | Requires proper sample collection, risk of contamination, needs strict chain of custody |
| Legal Challenges | Consent issues, privacy concerns, technical errors, admissibility criteria |
| Ethical Issues | Potential misuse, genetic privacy, compulsory testing controversies |
🔑 Key Takeaways
DNA profiling is a powerful forensic tool that has revolutionized criminal investigations.
Courts require strict adherence to legal protocols for sample collection, analysis, and reporting.
DNA evidence must be corroborated with other evidence and legal safeguards.
The technology can strengthen justice by convicting the guilty and protecting the innocent.
Continued evolution of DNA laws is necessary to address privacy and ethical concerns.
RELATED Blog
0 comments