Insults To Constitution And Flag
🔹 Legal Provisions
Article 51A(a) of the Indian Constitution makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen to “respect the Constitution, the National Flag and the National Anthem.”
Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971:
This Act specifically penalizes acts of disrespect or insult to the National Flag and Constitution.
Section 2 prohibits mishandling or insulting the Indian National Flag.
Section 3 penalizes disrespect to the Constitution of India.
🔹 What Constitutes Insult to Constitution and Flag?
Disrespecting, damaging, or burning the National Flag in public or private.
Using the National Flag for commercial purposes or as clothing.
Showing disrespect to the Constitution, by acts or speech that degrade it.
Public speeches or actions that insult or deride the Constitution or flag.
Such acts are seen as attacks on the nation’s unity and sovereignty.
📚 Detailed Case Laws
🔸 1. Shyam Narayan Chouksey v. Union of India (1991)
Facts:
The petitioner challenged the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, claiming it violated freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld the Act, stating that freedom of speech does not include the right to insult the National Flag or Constitution. The court emphasized the importance of protecting national symbols as essential to the unity and integrity of the country.
Importance:
This case balances freedom of expression with respect for national symbols, showing the state's power to restrict speech that insults the flag or Constitution.
🔸 2. Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986)
Facts:
Three students refused to sing the National Anthem in school citing religious beliefs. They stood respectfully but did not sing.
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled they did not insult the Constitution or flag because their conduct showed respect, despite not singing. It recognized freedom of religion and distinguished between disrespect and dissent.
Importance:
Clarified that insult must be intentional and direct, mere silence or abstention is not insult if respect is shown.
🔸 3. Balwant Singh v. Union of India (1995)
Facts:
The accused publicly burned the Indian National Flag during a protest.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld his conviction under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, stating that burning the flag is a clear act of insult to a national symbol and affects the unity of the nation.
Importance:
Confirmed that burning or desecration of the flag is not protected speech and is punishable.
🔸 4. S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal (2010)
Facts:
The case involved insulting remarks made against the National Anthem.
Held:
The court observed that while the National Anthem should be respected, the right to express views cannot be curbed unless it directly insults or harms the dignity of the anthem.
Importance:
This ruling distinguishes between criticism and insult, emphasizing context and intent.
🔸 5. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994)
Facts:
A journalist published critical content regarding national institutions and symbols.
Held:
The court upheld freedom of speech but clarified that criticism must not cross the line into insult or disrespect of constitutional symbols.
Importance:
Highlights the fine line between freedom of speech and insult to the Constitution.
🔸 6. Vishwa Lochan Madan v. Union of India (2014)
Facts:
A petition was filed challenging certain actions that allegedly insulted the National Flag.
Held:
The court reiterated that any act of disrespect or misuse of the National Flag is an offense under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act and emphasized that such protection is necessary for national dignity.
Importance:
Reaffirmed legal protection for the National Flag and Constitution.
🔍 Key Legal Principles
Respect for the National Flag and Constitution is a fundamental duty under Article 51A(a).
Freedom of speech is subject to reasonable restrictions, including protection of national symbols.
Insult means intentional disrespect or harm, mere dissent or criticism is not insult.
Use of National Flag for commercial purposes or desecration is punishable.
Courts recognize the need to balance individual freedoms with national dignity.
✅ Summary
Insulting the Constitution or National Flag is a serious offense, harming national pride and unity.
The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 provides legal protection.
The Supreme Court has consistently upheld these laws while balancing them with freedom of speech and religion.
Intent, context, and manner of the act are crucial in determining if there is an insult.
RELATED Blog
0 comments