Analysis Of Wrongful Conviction Cases In Canada
Wrongful conviction occurs when an innocent person is found guilty of a crime they did not commit. These cases often highlight failures in evidence, police investigation, or judicial procedures. Canadian law provides avenues for appeal, review, and compensation for wrongful convictions.
1. Case Study 1: David Milgaard (1969–1997)
Facts:
David Milgaard was wrongfully convicted of the murder of Gail Miller in Saskatchewan. His conviction was based on circumstantial evidence and a coerced confession. He spent 23 years in prison.
Legal Issue:
Reliability of eyewitness testimony
Misinterpretation of circumstantial evidence
Appeals and Review:
New DNA evidence in 1997 conclusively proved Milgaard’s innocence.
Held:
Conviction quashed; he was released and later awarded compensation.
Significance:
Demonstrated the critical role of DNA evidence in overturning wrongful convictions.
Highlighted systemic issues: pressure on police and unreliable witness testimony.
2. Case Study 2: Guy Paul Morin (1984–1995)
Facts:
Morin was convicted of the murder of 9-year-old Christine Jessop in Ontario. Evidence included hair and fibre analysis that was later discredited.
Legal Issue:
Forensic evidence misinterpretation
Police tunnel vision leading to confirmation bias
Appeals and Review:
Conviction overturned after DNA testing in 1995 matched another individual.
Held:
Morin acquitted; later received compensation.
Significance:
Led to the establishment of the Ontario Commission on Wrongful Convictions.
Raised awareness about forensic science limitations and investigative biases.
3. Case Study 3: Donald Marshall Jr. (1971–1983)
Facts:
Donald Marshall Jr., a Mi’kmaq man in Nova Scotia, was wrongly convicted of murdering a man in 1971. Evidence against him was flawed, including perjured witness statements and suppressed evidence.
Legal Issue:
Racial bias in investigation
Suppression of exculpatory evidence by police and prosecutors
Appeals and Review:
Conviction overturned in 1983; he was fully exonerated.
Held:
Public inquiry found systemic discrimination and prosecutorial misconduct.
Significance:
Highlighted racial bias and systemic injustice in the Canadian criminal justice system.
Resulted in reforms in police procedures and disclosure obligations.
4. Case Study 4: Steven Truscott (1959–2007)
Facts:
Steven Truscott was convicted at age 14 for the murder of Lynne Harper in Ontario. The case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and a questionable timeline.
Legal Issue:
Inadequate defense and unreliable forensic analysis
Misinterpretation of timelines in the investigation
Appeals and Review:
Conviction quashed in 2007 after reviewing forensic evidence and investigative errors.
Held:
Declared innocent by the Ontario Court of Appeal.
Significance:
Raised questions about juvenile convictions and safeguards in capital cases (Truscott was initially sentenced to death).
Highlighted the long-term consequences of investigative errors.
5. Case Study 5: James Driskell (1991–2009)
Facts:
Driskell was convicted of the murder of Helen Betty Osborne in Manitoba. His conviction relied on fabricated and misleading forensic evidence.
Legal Issue:
Forensic misconduct
Improper handling of evidence by police and laboratory analysts
Appeals and Review:
Conviction overturned in 2009 after DNA evidence proved his innocence.
Held:
Driskell acquitted and later compensated.
Significance:
Reinforced the need for independent review of forensic evidence.
Led to changes in forensic practices and disclosure obligations in Manitoba.
6. Causes of Wrongful Convictions in Canada (Lessons from Cases)
Faulty Forensic Evidence
Morin, Driskell: hair, fibre, and lab errors.
Eyewitness Misidentification
Milgaard, Truscott: reliance on mistaken or coerced testimony.
Police Misconduct and Tunnel Vision
Marshall Jr., Morin: selective evidence collection and bias.
Suppression of Exculpatory Evidence
Marshall Jr.: prosecutorial failure to disclose.
Systemic Bias
Racial bias: Donald Marshall Jr.
Inadequate Legal Representation
Truscott: poor defense for juvenile accused.
7. Reforms and Remedies in Canada
Innocence Canada / Commission on Wrongful Convictions: Investigates and advocates for the wrongfully convicted.
DNA Testing and Forensic Review: Mandatory re-evaluation of key evidence in serious convictions.
Compensation Programs: Financial redress for exonerees.
Disclosure Reforms: Courts require full disclosure of all evidence by prosecution.
Training for Police and Lawyers: To reduce bias and improve investigative practices.
8. Key Observations
DNA evidence has been instrumental in overturning convictions.
Wrongful convictions often span decades, highlighting the need for early safeguards.
Systemic biases—racial, age, or social—exacerbate wrongful convictions.
Independent commissions and advocacy groups are critical for review.
9. Conclusion
Canadian wrongful conviction cases demonstrate that investigative errors, flawed forensic evidence, and systemic biases can lead to devastating miscarriages of justice. Legal reforms, DNA testing, and commissions like Innocence Canada have been essential in preventing future injustices and compensating the innocent.
Key takeaway: Wrongful convictions are not just errors—they reveal structural weaknesses in policing, prosecution, and forensic analysis that require ongoing reform.
RELATED Blog
comments