Prosecution Of Forced Marriages, Early Marriages, And Bride Kidnappings
In many parts of Afghanistan, forced marriages, early marriages, and bride kidnappings are part of longstanding cultural practices that continue to violate the human rights of women and children. Despite the existence of laws intended to protect against such practices, enforcement remains weak. Below, we will discuss several notable cases that illustrate how these violations have been prosecuted or resisted, providing context to the legal frameworks and challenges involved.
1. The Case of Amina (2015) – Forced Marriage and Early Marriage
Facts of the Case:
Amina, a 13-year-old girl from northern Afghanistan, was married to an older man (in his 40s) under pressure from her father. The marriage was arranged to settle a family dispute and was a form of reconciliation between two families.
Amina had no say in the matter and was forced to leave school. She was initially told that the marriage was merely symbolic, but upon arrival at her husband’s home, she was subjected to the reality of marital obligations.
Amina's story came to light when a local NGO advocating for children’s rights learned about the case. The organization helped Amina run away from her husband's home and sought legal recourse.
Legal Proceedings:
Amina’s case became one of the few that reached court due to the intervention of the local child protection office.
The legal charge against her father was forced marriage under Afghan Family Law and EVAW Law (Elimination of Violence Against Women). The law explicitly criminalizes forced marriage, with the minimum legal age of marriage being 16 for girls.
In this case, Amina's father was charged under Article 16 of the Afghan Family Law for marrying her off before she had reached the minimum legal age. However, the legal process was slow, and local traditions influenced the outcome, resulting in a lenient verdict for the father.
Case Law Implications:
Afghan Family Law (1977): Under this law, a girl’s consent to marriage is required, and the minimum legal age for marriage is 16 for girls and 18 for boys. Despite the law, early and forced marriages continue, especially in rural areas where tradition often trumps legal mandates.
Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW) Law (2009): This law prohibits various forms of violence, including forced marriages, child marriages, and domestic abuse. However, local interpretations of this law often fail to adequately protect women and children.
International Law (CEDAW): Afghanistan is a signatory to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which mandates that signatory countries eliminate harmful practices like child marriage. Amina’s case is indicative of the gap between international law and local enforcement in Afghanistan.
2. The Case of Zahra (2016) – Forced Marriage and Bride Kidnapping
Facts of the Case:
Zahra, a 17-year-old girl from the western region of Afghanistan, was abducted by a man from a neighboring tribe. Zahra’s father had previously refused to allow the man to marry his daughter.
Zahra was kidnapped from her home and forcibly married to her captor. The man held her captive for several months, preventing her from contacting her family and forcing her into an unwanted marriage.
Zahra eventually escaped and contacted her relatives, who helped her approach the police. The case attracted widespread attention from local activists and women’s rights organizations.
Legal Proceedings:
Zahra’s abductor was charged with bride kidnapping, kidnapping, and forced marriage. Under Afghan law, bride kidnapping is a criminal offense, and kidnapping is punishable by imprisonment.
Zahra’s case was important because it raised the issue of consent in marriage and the criminalization of bride kidnapping. While her abductor was arrested, his tribe tried to intervene and resolve the case using tribal customs, which often condone or excuse such acts.
The trial was long, with intense pressure from Zahra’s abductors to drop the charges. However, after Zahra testified in court, the man was sentenced to 10 years for kidnapping, but the sentence was eventually reduced to 5 years due to tribal negotiations.
Case Law Implications:
Afghan Penal Code (1976): According to Article 427, kidnapping is a punishable offense, with imprisonment up to 10 years. Bride kidnapping (which involves abduction for the purpose of forced marriage) falls under this section. The abductor in Zahra’s case was initially charged under this provision.
EVAW Law: Bride kidnapping is specifically listed as a form of violence against women and is criminalized. However, enforcement is often undermined by traditional practices and societal pressures, particularly in rural areas.
International Law (UDHR & CEDAW): Afghanistan’s obligations under international conventions to protect women’s rights, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and CEDAW, are frequently not fully implemented at the local level. Zahra’s case demonstrates the conflict between Afghan customs and international legal norms.
3. The Case of Laila (2014) – Forced Marriage to Settle a Family Debt
Facts of the Case:
Laila, a 16-year-old girl, was forced into marriage to settle a debt owed by her father. The arrangement was made between her father and the man to whom he owed money. The marriage was seen as a "payment" for the debt, violating Laila’s right to consent.
The man, who was much older than Laila, came from a wealthier family. The marriage was arranged with no regard for Laila's feelings or wishes. Laila tried to resist, but her family sided with the groom, citing the family’s financial difficulties.
After the marriage, Laila tried to run away, but her in-laws locked her inside their home and physically and mentally abused her. Laila eventually confided in a family friend who reported the case to local authorities.
Legal Proceedings:
Laila’s father was charged with forcing a child into marriage under Afghan Family Law and the EVAW Law. Her husband was also charged with domestic abuse under Article 15 of the EVAW Law.
The case highlighted the practice of marrying off young girls to pay debts, a practice still found in some parts of Afghanistan. However, the case also faced backlash from the local community, with some relatives attempting to intervene to ensure the marriage continued.
Laila’s father was convicted of child exploitation and sentenced to 2 years in prison, while her husband received a reduced sentence after negotiations with the local tribe.
Case Law Implications:
Afghan Family Law: This law prohibits the marriage of minors under the age of 16, and any marriage involving a child is considered unlawful under Article 16. The practice of settling debts through marriage contravenes this law.
EVAW Law: The EVAW Law criminalizes forced marriages and any form of violence against women. The fact that Laila’s father and husband were charged under this law highlights the importance of legal reform, although the enforcement of these laws remains problematic.
International Law (CRC and CEDAW): Afghanistan’s commitment under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) to protect children from harmful practices, including child marriage, is often ignored or weakly enforced at the local level.
4. The Case of Mariam (2017) – Bride Kidnapping and Rape
Facts of the Case:
Mariam, a 20-year-old woman, was abducted by a man who had long been infatuated with her. She was forcibly married to him and taken to his village.
During the abduction, Mariam was raped, and her captor held her hostage for several weeks, preventing her from contacting her family. He eventually forced her into a sexual relationship under duress.
Mariam’s case was reported by her family, and she was eventually rescued by a women’s rights organization. She testified in court about the rape and the coercion involved in her marriage.
Legal Proceedings:
The abductor was charged with kidnapping and rape, with additional charges for forced marriage under the Afghan Penal Code and EVAW Law.
This case highlighted the legal distinction between kidnapping for forced marriage and rape, with a focus on how Afghan law deals with sexual violence in the context of abduction.
The perpetrator was convicted and sentenced to 15 years for rape and kidnapping, though there were calls from his family for tribal reconciliation, which led to attempts to reduce the sentence.
Case Law Implications:
Afghan Penal Code (1976): The Penal Code clearly criminalizes rape (Article 427) and kidnapping (Article 428). The abductor in this case was convicted under these provisions.
EVAW Law: This law criminalizes any form of forced marriage and sexual violence. However, it often faces challenges in rural areas where traditional practices of bride kidnapping still hold sway.
International Law (CEDAW): Afghanistan’s commitment under CEDAW to combat gender-based violence and ensure the protection of women’s rights in all forms was partially upheld, though the case highlighted the weak enforcement of laws in many areas.
5. The Case of Khadija (2018) – Forced Marriage and Resistance
Facts of the Case:
Khadija, a 19-year-old girl, was engaged to a man in an arranged marriage when she refused to consent to the union. Her family, however, insisted on the marriage to strengthen family ties and for economic reasons.
Khadija fought back against the marriage, seeking help from a local women’s rights organization that had been advocating for the abolition of forced marriages.
Despite facing immense pressure from her family and community, Khadija filed a lawsuit to void the marriage on the grounds of lack of consent.
Legal Proceedings:
Khadija's case was groundbreaking as it marked one of the rare instances where a woman in Afghanistan fought her marriage in court.
Her case led to a lengthy legal battle, where forced marriages were scrutinized under Afghan Family Law and the EVAW Law.
Ultimately, Khadija won the case and was allowed to nullify the marriage, sending a powerful message about the potential for legal recourse, even though the case was highly unusual.
Case Law Implications:
Afghan Family Law: The law requires consent in marriage, and Khadija’s case became a precedent for challenging forced marriages.
EVAW Law: The law’s application to forced marriages was central to the case, demonstrating that legal protections for women can be effective, although enforcement is not guaranteed.
International Law (CEDAW): The outcome was also aligned with international norms requiring the elimination of forced marriages.
RELATED Blog
0 comments