Anti-Terrorism Criminal Law In Xinjiang
🔹 1. Legal Framework: Anti-Terrorism Law in China
China’s anti-terrorism regime in Xinjiang relies on national criminal law, the Anti-Terrorism Law of the PRC (2015), and regional security measures.
Key Laws and Provisions
Anti-Terrorism Law of the PRC (2015)
Defines terrorism as intentional use of violence or threat to endanger society, public safety, or state security.
Criminalizes financing, organizing, training, or supporting terrorist organizations.
Gives public security authorities broad powers for surveillance, investigation, and detention.
Criminal Law of the PRC
Article 102 & 103: Crimes of terrorism-related separatism and extremism.
Article 114 & 115: Incitement of separatism, planning, and organizing violent attacks.
Xinjiang Regional Regulations
Implement stricter measures for counter-terrorism, surveillance, and re-education.
Law enforcement often emphasizes prevention and control of “religious extremism” as part of terrorism prevention.
Key Criminal Implications
Severe punishments: Death penalty, life imprisonment, or long-term imprisonment (10–20 years).
Broad interpretation of terrorism: Includes violent acts, incitement, online extremism, and association with banned organizations.
Preventive detention: Authorities may detain individuals suspected of involvement in extremism or terrorism without conventional criminal trials.
🔹 2. Case Law Illustrations
Here are five notable cases from Xinjiang demonstrating the application of anti-terrorism criminal law:
Case 1: East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) Members Arrested (2013, Hotan, Xinjiang)
Facts:
Members of ETIM were accused of plotting terrorist attacks targeting government offices and public places.
Legal Basis:
Criminal Law Articles 102, 103 (separatism and terrorism)
Anti-Terrorism Law 2015
Judgment:
Several members sentenced to death penalty; others received 20-year imprisonment.
Evidence included intercepted communications, weapons caches, and financial records.
Significance:
Illustrates prosecution of organized terrorist networks.
Demonstrates reliance on communications interception and intelligence evidence.
Case 2: Knife Attack in Urumqi Market (2014)
Facts:
A group of Uyghur men conducted a knife attack in a public marketplace, killing multiple civilians.
Legal Basis:
Article 102 (terrorist acts threatening public safety)
Article 234 (intentional injury)
Judgment:
Perpetrators sentenced to death.
Trial emphasized intent to terrorize the population rather than personal motive.
Significance:
Shows broad application of anti-terrorism laws to violent public attacks.
Reinforces zero tolerance approach for civilian-targeted violence.
Case 3: Bombing Attempt in Kashgar Train Station (2015)
Facts:
Suspects attempted to detonate explosives at Kashgar railway station; plot foiled by police.
Legal Basis:
Anti-Terrorism Law (Articles 12–14)
Criminal Law Article 102 (organizing terrorist activity)
Judgment:
Planners sentenced to death or life imprisonment.
Evidence included explosives, surveillance footage, and witness testimony.
Significance:
Demonstrates preventive action and prosecution for planned terrorist acts.
Emphasizes state control and rapid intervention.
Case 4: Online Radicalization and Extremism (2016, Hotan)
Facts:
Uyghur individuals were arrested for sharing extremist content online, including calls for violent jihad.
Legal Basis:
Anti-Terrorism Law (Articles 12, 21 – support and promotion of terrorism)
Criminal Law Article 103 (incitement to terrorism)
Judgment:
Defendants sentenced to 5–15 years imprisonment.
Court highlighted online activity as a serious form of terrorism facilitation.
Significance:
Shows expansion of anti-terrorism prosecution to digital activities.
Emphasizes preventive control of radicalization.
Case 5: Religious Extremism and “Illegal Organization” Case (2017, Aksu)
Facts:
Individuals running an unregistered religious school were accused of promoting religious extremism and terrorism recruitment.
Legal Basis:
Anti-Terrorism Law (Articles 12 & 20)
Criminal Law Article 102 (terrorism-related activity)
Judgment:
Sentences ranged from 10–15 years imprisonment.
Property and materials confiscated; educational operation shut down.
Significance:
Illustrates overlap of religious activity and terrorism in law enforcement.
Courts used association with extremist content to justify terrorism charges.
🔹 3. Analytical Summary
| Type of Offense | Legal Basis | Punishment Range | Case Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organized Terrorist Group | Article 102, Anti-Terrorism Law | Death/life imprisonment | ETIM members, Hotan (2013) |
| Public Violence / Knife Attack | Article 102 & 234 | Death | Urumqi Market Attack (2014) |
| Bombing / Plot | Anti-Terrorism Law | Death / Life | Kashgar Train Station (2015) |
| Online Extremism | Anti-Terrorism Law | 5–15 years | Hotan radicalization case (2016) |
| Religious Extremism Recruitment | Anti-Terrorism Law & Article 102 | 10–15 years | Aksu school case (2017) |
Key Observations:
Anti-terrorism law in Xinjiang is broadly applied to violent acts, extremist promotion, and unregistered religious/educational activity.
Severe sentences, including death, are common for physical attacks and organized plots.
Courts often combine criminal law and anti-terrorism provisions to cover both action and facilitation.
Preventive measures (online surveillance, monitoring religious activity) play a central role.
🔹 4. Conclusion
In Xinjiang, anti-terrorism criminal law:
Targets both actual terrorist acts and preparatory/extremist activity.
Imposes severe penalties, reflecting the state’s focus on security and stability.
Expands traditional criminal law definitions to include digital radicalization and religious extremism.
Shows a proactive, preventive approach with emphasis on collective social security over individual rights.
RELATED Blog
comments