Prosecution Of Environmental Crimes Such As Illegal Logging, Pollution, And River Encroachment
🌲 1. M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997) – Timber Smuggling Case
Citation: AIR 1997 SC 1122
Facts:
The case involved illegal felling and transportation of timber from forests in India by a company associated with Kamal Nath, who was then the Union Minister.
The wood was illegally transported without permits, violating the Indian Forest Act, 1927.
Legal Issues:
Criminal liability under Indian Forest Act.
Responsibility of government officials and private individuals in facilitating illegal logging.
Judgment:
Supreme Court held that illegal felling and transportation of timber constitutes a cognizable offence.
The Court emphasized that forest protection is a public trust, and violators must face criminal prosecution, regardless of status.
Legal Principle:
Illegal logging is a serious environmental crime; courts uphold public trust doctrine and allow criminal action against both private parties and complicit officials.
🌿 2. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India – Ganga Pollution Case (1988)
Citation: AIR 1988 SC 1037
Facts:
Industrial units in Kanpur and Uttarakhand were discharging untreated effluents into the Ganga, polluting the river.
Legal Issues:
Violation of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Environment Protection Act, 1986.
Whether criminal prosecution can be initiated against polluting industries.
Judgment:
Supreme Court held that industries causing pollution can face criminal liability.
Directed closure of non-compliant industries until proper effluent treatment facilities were installed.
Introduced the principle of absolute liability for hazardous industries.
Legal Principle:
Industrial pollution is a criminal offence, and courts can mandate prosecution, closure, and compensation.
🌊 3. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)
Citation: AIR 1996 SC 2715
Facts:
Tanneries in Tamil Nadu discharged untreated effluents into rivers, contaminating water and affecting nearby villages.
Legal Issues:
Prosecution of industries under Water Act 1974 and Environment Protection Act 1986.
Accountability of regulatory authorities for failing to prosecute polluters.
Judgment:
Supreme Court ordered criminal prosecution of polluting industries.
Applied the Polluter Pays Principle, requiring industries to compensate victims and pay fines.
Legal Principle:
Environmental crimes include both direct illegal acts by industries and regulatory negligence, allowing courts to enforce prosecution and compensation.
🏞️ 4. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996 onwards) – Forest Encroachment & Logging
Citation: AIR 1997 SC 1228
Facts:
This case involved large-scale illegal logging and forest encroachments across India.
Petitioners sought action against private parties and government departments failing to protect forests.
Legal Issues:
Enforcement of Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Indian Penal Code provisions on destruction of forests.
Criminal liability for illegal felling and land encroachment.
Judgment:
Supreme Court directed eviction of encroachers and prosecution of violators under forest law.
Introduced monitoring committees and strict supervision by courts for forest protection.
Legal Principle:
Forests are a public trust, and illegal logging or encroachment attracts criminal liability; courts can actively supervise prosecution.
🏭 5. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1996)
Citation: AIR 1996 SC 1446
Facts:
Chemical and pesticide manufacturing units in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka discharged hazardous effluents into rivers and soil.
Legal Issues:
Violation of Water Act, Environment Protection Act, and IPC sections on public nuisance and negligence.
Criminal prosecution for industrial pollution and environmental degradation.
Judgment:
Supreme Court ordered criminal prosecution of industries.
Directed payment of compensation and remediation of contaminated soil and water.
Legal Principle:
Environmental crimes extend to industrial pollution, which is punishable both criminally and civilly; judicial oversight ensures enforcement.
🌊 6. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India – River Encroachment Case (1986)
Facts:
Encroachments along the banks of rivers in Delhi were obstructing natural drainage and causing flooding.
Legal Issues:
Violation of environmental regulations prohibiting river encroachment.
Whether criminal prosecution could be initiated against encroachers.
Judgment:
Supreme Court ordered removal of all illegal structures.
Directed prosecution for obstruction of waterways, emphasizing the importance of protecting rivers as public resources.
Legal Principle:
River encroachment is a criminal and civil offence; courts can enforce removal, prosecute violators, and order restoration.
🌲 7. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products (Illegal Logging, 2010)
Facts:
Private timber companies were involved in large-scale illegal felling in Himachal Pradesh forests.
Legal Issues:
Enforcement of Indian Forest Act and IPC sections on theft and environmental destruction.
Judgment:
High Court upheld criminal prosecution of companies and individuals, imposing fines and jail sentences for illegal felling.
Emphasized strict supervision of forest resources.
Legal Principle:
Courts uphold criminal accountability for illegal logging; administrative failure does not absolve violators.
🔑 Key Takeaways
| Type of Crime | Case | Legal Issue | Outcome/Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illegal Logging | M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath | Indian Forest Act violations | Criminal prosecution, public trust doctrine enforced |
| Industrial Pollution | M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga) | Water Act, EPA violations | Closure of industries, criminal liability |
| River Pollution | Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum | Water contamination | Criminal prosecution + compensation |
| Forest Encroachment | T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad | Forest Conservation Act | Eviction + prosecution |
| Industrial Waste | Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action | Soil & water pollution | Criminal prosecution + remediation |
| River Encroachment | M.C. Mehta v. Union of India | Encroachment & public nuisance | Removal of encroachments + prosecution |
| Illegal Logging | State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products | Timber felling | Fines, jail sentences |
✅ Summary
Environmental crimes such as illegal logging, pollution, and river encroachment are cognizable offences under Indian law.
Courts have consistently upheld criminal prosecution alongside civil remedies and compensation.
Key principles include: Polluter Pays, Absolute Liability for hazardous industries, and Public Trust Doctrine.
Judicial oversight ensures regulatory compliance and protection of natural resources.
RELATED Blog
comments