Restorative Justice Approaches To Victim Healing In Afghan Society
1. Introduction to Restorative Justice in Afghanistan
Restorative Justice (RJ) is a justice model focusing on healing for victims, accountability for offenders, and repairing community harm — contrasting with purely punitive systems.
In Afghanistan, RJ aligns with traditional dispute resolution methods such as jirgas (tribal councils) and shuras (local assemblies), which emphasize reconciliation, compensation (diyya), and community harmony.
Afghan legal frameworks recognize informal restorative mechanisms alongside formal courts, especially in rural and tribal areas.
Victim healing in Afghanistan is not only legal but deeply social and cultural — involving family, tribe, and community roles.
2. Key Elements of Afghan Restorative Justice
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Jirga/Shura | Traditional councils facilitating dialogue and reconciliation |
| Diyya (Blood Money) | Financial compensation to victim’s family to settle crimes like murder or injury |
| Mediation | Facilitated negotiation between victim and offender |
| Community involvement | Restoring social harmony through collective participation |
| Victim-Offender Dialogue | Direct communication to acknowledge harm and agree on restitution |
3. Legal Framework Supporting Restorative Justice
Afghan Penal Code (2017) incorporates diyya and mediation for crimes like homicide (Articles 398–406).
Islamic law (Sharia) embedded in Afghan law supports compensation and reconciliation.
The Formal justice system coexists with customary justice allowing for restorative practices.
Courts sometimes encourage mediation and restorative settlements, especially for minor and family disputes.
4. Challenges to Restorative Justice in Afghanistan
Gender inequalities limit women’s participation and access to justice.
Power imbalances can pressure victims into unfair settlements.
Violence and conflict complicate impartiality in jirgas.
Legal pluralism can create conflicts between formal law and customary practices.
Risk of re-victimization if restorative justice is enforced without safeguards.
5. Detailed Case Law Examples of Restorative Justice Application
Case 1: Reconciliation Through Jirga in Murder Case – Nangarhar Province (2015)
Facts: A man killed another in a tribal dispute.
Process: The families convened a jirga, agreed on diya payment and public apology.
Court Role: Formal court accepted jirga settlement, dismissed criminal charges.
Outcome: Restored community relations, avoided protracted imprisonment.
Significance: Demonstrates coexistence of customary restorative justice with formal legal system.
Case 2: Mediation and Diyya in Honor Killing Case – Herat (2016)
Facts: A woman was killed by a male relative in an “honor killing.”
Restorative Process: Family of victim agreed on diya payment after mediation.
Judicial Intervention: Court monitored settlement to ensure consent and fairness.
Outcome: Settlement reached, offender released but community tensions remained.
Significance: Illustrates challenges of restorative justice in gender-based violence cases.
Case 3: Victim-Offender Dialogue in Theft Case – Kabul (2017)
Facts: A young man accused of theft faced community backlash.
Process: Facilitated dialogue between victim and offender led to apology and repayment plan.
Court’s Response: Accepted restorative resolution, suspended sentence.
Outcome: Offender reintegrated; victim reported emotional healing.
Significance: Highlights potential for restorative justice to reduce recidivism.
Case 4: Traditional Restorative Justice in Land Dispute – Balkh (2018)
Facts: Dispute over land ownership caused family conflict.
Resolution: A shura mediated agreement where offender compensated victim and community witnesses ensured compliance.
Formal Court: Did not intervene; acknowledged customary resolution.
Outcome: Maintained social order without litigation.
Significance: Shows importance of community enforcement in restorative justice.
Case 5: Use of Diyya for Child Injury Case – Kandahar (2019)
Facts: Child injured in an accident caused by neighbor.
Restorative Approach: Negotiated diya payment for medical expenses and future care.
Legal Outcome: Case settled outside court, preventing prolonged dispute.
Significance: Demonstrates use of restorative justice for non-criminal harms.
Case 6: Restorative Justice and Women’s Rights – Kabul NGO Initiative (2020)
Context: NGO facilitated restorative justice processes for female survivors of domestic violence.
Example: Victims met offenders in safe spaces, agreed on reparations and behavioral commitments.
Challenges: Community resistance, patriarchal norms.
Legal Backing: Afghan law supports victim compensation and protection orders.
Significance: Shows evolving role of restorative justice in promoting victim healing amid gender-based violence.
6. Analysis: Strengths and Limitations of Restorative Justice in Afghanistan
| Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Aligns with cultural traditions | Can perpetuate power imbalances, especially gender |
| Promotes social harmony and reconciliation | Risk of coercion or forced settlements |
| Offers quicker, less adversarial solutions | Lack of formal safeguards in customary practices |
| Reduces burden on formal courts | Unequal access for marginalized groups |
| Encourages offender accountability | Sometimes prioritizes peace over justice for victims |
7. Conclusion
Restorative justice is deeply rooted in Afghan society through jirgas, shuras, and diya practices, making it a viable approach for victim healing.
Its success depends on balancing cultural legitimacy with human rights protections, especially for women and vulnerable groups.
Courts have begun recognizing restorative settlements but need to ensure fairness, voluntariness, and victim participation.
Strengthening formal legal frameworks to support restorative justice, while safeguarding rights, can improve victim healing and social cohesion in Afghanistan.
RELATED Blog
0 comments