Concept Of Criminal Liability In Finland
Concept of Criminal Liability in Finland
In Finland, criminal liability is governed primarily by the Criminal Code of Finland (Rikoslaki, 1889/39, with amendments). Key principles include:
Actus Reus and Mens Rea:
Liability generally requires a criminal act (teko) and a guilty mind (tahallisuus or tuottamus).
Tahallisuus (intent): The individual acts knowingly or deliberately.
Tuottamus (negligence): Liability arises when harm results from careless or negligent behavior.
Age of Criminal Responsibility:
Individuals under 15 years are not criminally liable.
Ages 15–17 are considered juvenile offenders and are handled under special provisions.
Strict Liability:
Some minor offenses, such as traffic violations, may impose liability without proof of intent.
Corporate Liability:
Under the Limited Liability Companies Act, Finnish law allows corporations to be held liable for crimes committed by representatives acting on behalf of the company.
Causation and Proximate Cause:
Criminal liability requires a direct causal link between the act and harm.
Foreseeability plays a role in determining liability for negligent acts.
Case Law Examples
1. KKO 2005:59 – Negligent Homicide
Facts:
A driver caused a fatal car accident while speeding in a residential area.
The driver claimed he did not intend harm.
Decision:
Supreme Court (KKO) held the driver criminally liable for negligent homicide under the Criminal Code.
Sentence: Conditional imprisonment, reflecting negligence rather than intent.
Significance:
Reinforced that negligent acts can create criminal liability even without intent to harm.
2. KKO 2007:88 – Assault with Intent
Facts:
An individual attacked another with a knife during a bar fight.
Victim suffered serious bodily injuries.
Decision:
KKO affirmed conviction for assault (tahallinen pahoinpitely).
Intentional act was evident from the use of a weapon and targeted attack.
Significance:
Clarifies application of tahallisuus (intentionality) in violent crimes.
3. KKO 2010:123 – Corporate Liability in Environmental Crime
Facts:
A chemical company illegally disposed of toxic waste, contaminating a local river.
Corporate management argued liability should not attach to the company.
Decision:
KKO held the company criminally liable, citing representative action and failure to prevent the offense.
Management also personally fined for negligence.
Significance:
Demonstrates corporate criminal liability under Finnish law.
Emphasizes duty of supervision and compliance within organizations.
4. KKO 2012:45 – Fraud (Petos) by False Representation
Facts:
Individual submitted false invoices to obtain government subsidies.
Decision:
Supreme Court found intentional deception sufficient for criminal liability.
Imposed a fine and partial restitution.
Significance:
Shows intent to deceive as a core element for financial crimes.
Highlights courts’ focus on both act and mental state.
5. KKO 2015:88 – Drug Trafficking Case
Facts:
Foreign national caught importing illegal narcotics into Finland.
Decision:
KKO affirmed conviction for trafficking under Criminal Code Chapter 50.
Sentence: Several years’ imprisonment, reflecting the severity of harm to society.
Significance:
Reinforces that criminal liability applies equally to foreigners under Finnish law.
Shows strict approach for controlled substances.
6. KKO 2017:22 – Manslaughter with Recklessness
Facts:
Construction worker ignored safety protocols, leading to a coworker’s death.
Decision:
Court held the worker criminally liable for reckless manslaughter, even without intent to kill.
Sentence: Conditional imprisonment.
Significance:
Illustrates the concept of tuottamus (negligence/recklessness) causing criminal liability.
7. KKO 2019:45 – Sexual Abuse Case
Facts:
Teacher abused a minor student over several months.
Decision:
KKO found both intent and aggravated circumstances sufficient for long-term imprisonment.
Significance:
Clarifies assessment of intentionality and aggravating factors in crimes against minors.
Key Observations
Intent vs Negligence: Finnish courts carefully distinguish between intentional crimes and negligent acts.
Age Consideration: Juvenile offenders are treated separately; criminal liability starts at 15.
Corporate Responsibility: Companies can face criminal liability if representatives commit crimes in an organizational capacity.
Severity of Harm: Sentencing reflects both the intent and the social harm caused.
Foreign Nationals: Finland applies criminal law equally to non-citizens.
RELATED Blog
comments