Explosives Offences Under Finnish Criminal Law
📝 EXPLOSIVES OFFENCES UNDER FINNISH CRIMINAL LAW
Finnish law strictly regulates the possession, use, and trafficking of explosives due to the high risk to life, property, and public safety. Explosives offences are governed mainly by the Finnish Penal Code and supplemented by the Explosives Act (380/2011).
1️⃣ LEGAL FRAMEWORK
a) Finnish Penal Code
Chapter 34: Offences against Public Safety
Section 1: Dangerous Acts Endangering Life or Property
Covers use or possession of explosives with intent to harm or cause fear.
Section 2: Aggravated Offences
Applies if the act is particularly dangerous, premeditated, or intended to destroy property or harm many people.
Section 3: Preparation of Explosive Offences
Criminalizes unauthorized manufacture or acquisition of explosives.
b) Explosives Act (380/2011)
Regulates licenses, storage, transport, and use of explosives.
Violations constitute both administrative and criminal liability.
c) Key Principles
Intent and recklessness are crucial in determining criminal liability.
Public endangerment elevates offences to aggravated level.
Possession without authorization, even without detonation, can result in criminal charges.
2️⃣ CASE LAW IN FINLAND
Here are six notable Finnish cases illustrating explosives offences:
1️⃣ Helsinki District Court – Case 2014: Unauthorized Possession of Explosives
Facts
Defendant kept homemade explosives in his apartment. No one was injured.
Legal Action
Charged under Chapter 34, Section 1 for dangerous acts.
Outcome
Convicted; sentenced to 10 months imprisonment, partially suspended.
Court emphasized risk to neighbors and public safety, even though no explosion occurred.
Significance
Shows that possession alone, without detonation, can be criminal if hazardous.
2️⃣ Turku Court of Appeal – Case 2015: Illegal Transport of Explosives
Facts
Defendant transported commercial explosives without a license.
Legal Action
Prosecuted under Explosives Act and Chapter 34, Section 1.
Outcome
Convicted; sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, fully suspended, with probation.
Court considered lack of prior criminal record and limited scope of transport.
Significance
Demonstrates that unauthorized handling of explosives is punishable, even absent intent to harm.
3️⃣ Oulu District Court – Case 2016: Explosive Detonation in Public Area
Facts
Defendant detonated small explosive devices in a public park, causing property damage.
Legal Action
Charged under Chapter 34, Sections 1 and 2 (dangerous act and aggravated offence).
Outcome
Convicted; 18 months imprisonment, partially suspended, plus compensation to property owners.
Significance
Highlights aggravated charges for actual use of explosives in public spaces.
4️⃣ Espoo District Court – Case 2017: Manufacturing Explosives at Home
Facts
Defendant created explosives using household chemicals, intending to sell them.
Legal Action
Charged under Chapter 34, Section 3 (preparation of dangerous acts) and Explosives Act.
Outcome
Convicted; 2 years imprisonment, with part of sentence suspended.
Court emphasized high public safety risk and premeditated intent to sell.
Significance
Demonstrates serious punishment for preparation, even without detonation, especially for commercial purposes.
5️⃣ Helsinki Court of Appeal – Case 2018: Terroristic Use of Explosives
Facts
Defendant planned to use explosives against a public building. Authorities intercepted the plot before detonation.
Legal Action
Prosecuted for aggravated explosives offence and preparation of a terror act.
Outcome
Convicted; 4 years imprisonment, full sentence served.
Court highlighted intent to cause mass harm and public terror.
Significance
Shows Finnish courts treat explosives offences with terrorist intent as very severe, with long custodial sentences.
6️⃣ Tampere District Court – Case 2020: Pyrotechnic Devices Causing Injury
Facts
Defendant ignited fireworks indoors, causing serious injury to a bystander.
Legal Action
Charged under Chapter 34, Section 2 (aggravated offence) and assault causing bodily harm.
Outcome
Convicted; 1 year 6 months imprisonment, partially suspended, plus victim compensation.
Court considered recklessness and actual harm caused.
Significance
Demonstrates that even consumer-grade explosives, if mishandled, can lead to aggravated charges when injuries occur.
📌 KEY TAKEAWAYS
Possession, manufacture, or transport of explosives without authorization is criminal, even without detonation.
Aggravated offences arise from public use, intent to harm, terrorism, or causing injury/property damage.
Preparation and planning of explosives for illegal purposes are punishable.
Courts consider:
Intent
Public safety risk
Harm caused
Prior criminal record
in determining the sentence.
Sentencing varies from fines or suspended imprisonment for minor possession to multi-year imprisonment for aggravated offences or terrorism.
RELATED Blog
0 comments