Criminal Liability For Financial Crimes Using Fintech Platforms, Online Banking Fraud, And Digital Payment Abuse
I. Overview
Financial crimes via fintech, online banking, and digital payment systems have grown due to:
Rapid adoption of mobile banking apps, wallets, and UPI systems.
Peer-to-peer lending platforms.
E-commerce and payment gateways.
Cryptocurrency and digital token platforms integrated with banking.
These crimes can include:
Online banking fraud – unauthorized transactions, phishing, SIM swaps.
Digital payment abuse – misuse of wallets, UPI, payment gateways.
Fintech platform fraud – false investment schemes, fraudulent loans, identity theft.
Cyber-enabled misappropriation of funds – hacking, malware, keylogging.
Criminal liability arises under:
Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 415 (cheating), 463–465 (forgery), 66C, 66D (IT Act).
Information Technology Act (IT Act), 2000 – Sections 43, 66, 66C, 66D, 66F (cyber crimes).
Banking and financial regulations – RBI guidelines, Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007.
II. Key Cases
1. State vs. Javed & Ors. (UP, India – Online Banking Fraud)
Facts:
Javed and his associates used phishing emails and cloned debit cards to withdraw money from victims’ accounts across Uttar Pradesh. The fraud involved multiple banks and over ₹1.5 crore in misappropriated funds.
Legal Issues:
Unauthorized access to banking accounts (IPC 420, IT Act 66C).
Criminal breach of trust via electronic means.
Decision:
The court convicted the accused for cheating and criminal breach of trust using digital methods. Sentences ranged from 5 to 7 years of rigorous imprisonment with fines.
Significance:
Confirms that online banking fraud is prosecuted under both IPC and IT Act.
Sets precedent that phishing and cloning debit cards constitute cyber-enabled cheating.
2. State of Maharashtra vs. Digital Payment Fraudsters (UPI Scam)
Facts:
A group exploited vulnerabilities in a popular UPI platform to transfer small amounts repeatedly to multiple accounts, accumulating about ₹50 lakh over several months.
Legal Issues:
Misuse of digital payment platforms (IT Act Sections 66C, 66D).
Fraud and cheating using electronic means (IPC Sections 420 & 467).
Decision:
The court found the perpetrators guilty of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and identity theft via digital platforms. Compensation was ordered to be reimbursed to the banks and victims.
Significance:
Digital payment platforms are legally accountable; fraudsters cannot escape liability due to the use of fintech technology.
Emphasizes the role of KYC and transaction monitoring.
3. RBI vs. S. Rajesh (Mobile Wallet Fraud Case)
Facts:
Rajesh operated a mobile wallet provider but diverted customer deposits to personal accounts, creating a Ponzi-like scheme promising high returns on wallet balances.
Legal Issues:
Criminal breach of trust (IPC Section 406).
Misrepresentation and cheating (IPC Section 420).
Violation of RBI payment system regulations.
Decision:
The courts held Rajesh criminally liable, imposing a prison term of 7 years and ordering restitution to victims. RBI also revoked his wallet license.
Significance:
Demonstrates that fintech platforms must segregate customer funds.
Misappropriation of digital wallets is treated as serious criminal offense.
4. United States v. Sergey Aleynikov (Fintech / High-Frequency Trading Fraud – USA)
Facts:
Aleynikov, a software engineer at Goldman Sachs, illegally copied proprietary high-frequency trading software and attempted to use it at a competitor firm.
Legal Issues:
Theft of trade secrets under federal law.
Misuse of digital information via fintech platforms.
Decision:
Initially convicted, later partially overturned, but the case highlighted criminal liability for fintech-related software theft.
Significance:
Fintech intellectual property is protected under law; stealing algorithms constitutes financial crime.
Encourages robust internal security and compliance in digital financial services.
5. ICICI Bank vs. Phishing / Account Takeover (India)
Facts:
Fraudsters used malware and fake emails to obtain customer OTPs and passwords, transferring funds to shell accounts. Losses exceeded ₹2 crore.
Legal Issues:
Fraud under IPC Sections 420 & 467.
Identity theft and phishing under IT Act Sections 66C & 66D.
Decision:
The accused were convicted, ordered to repay stolen funds, and sentenced to 5 years of imprisonment.
Significance:
Reinforces the principle of criminal liability for phishing and digital payment abuse.
Shows the courts hold individuals accountable even when crimes are technically “remote.”
6. Punjab National Bank (PNB) vs. Nirav Modi / Mehul Choksi Fraud (Digital Banking Abuse)
Facts:
The PNB fraud involved fraudulent issuance of Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) via digital banking systems to siphon funds overseas. Losses were over $2 billion.
Legal Issues:
Bank fraud (IPC Sections 420, 409).
Criminal conspiracy (IPC Section 120B).
Misuse of banking technology and SWIFT system.
Decision:
Criminal charges were filed in India and abroad. Courts issued arrest warrants; extradition proceedings were initiated.
Significance:
Major illustration of fintech-related criminal liability in banking systems.
Shows high-level conspiracy and digital platform manipulation are prosecutable.
7. State vs. Paytm Fraudsters (Digital Wallet Scam)
Facts:
A group used fake KYC documents to create multiple Paytm wallet accounts and launder money. They also exploited cashback loopholes to generate unauthorized funds.
Legal Issues:
Money laundering under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Fraud via digital payments (IPC Sections 420, IT Act Sections 66C, 66D).
Decision:
Court convicted them under IT Act and IPC for cheating, identity theft, and money laundering. Fines and jail terms were imposed.
Significance:
Digital wallet platforms must ensure strict KYC verification.
Exploiting fintech promotional schemes constitutes criminal fraud.
III. Key Principles from Cases
Online banking fraud → prosecuted under IPC 420, 406, IT Act 66C/66D.
Fintech misappropriation → wallets, P2P platforms, or apps misusing customer funds are criminally liable.
Digital payment abuse → exploiting UPI, wallets, or payment gateway vulnerabilities is punishable.
High-value fraud / conspiracy → cases like PNB-Nirav Modi show cross-border and systemic financial crime enforcement.
Regulatory compliance matters → RBI, SEBI, and fintech regulations enforce financial responsibility alongside criminal law.
Identity theft & phishing → using malware, OTP theft, or fake KYC to commit fraud is prosecutable.
These seven cases provide a strong understanding of criminal liability in fintech, online banking fraud, and digital payment abuse.
RELATED Blog
0 comments