Indecent Assault Prosecutions
Indecent Assault Overview
Indecent assault is a criminal offense involving unlawful sexual contact with another person without consent, but which does not amount to rape. In India, it is primarily dealt with under:
Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Assault or use of criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty.
Section 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012 – Assault against minors.
Globally, similar offenses are recognized under criminal codes as sexual assault or molestation.
Case 1: State of Punjab v. Ram Singh [1998]
Facts: Ram Singh touched a woman inappropriately on a public bus without her consent.
Legal Issue: Assault with intent to outrage modesty under IPC Section 354.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Key Point: Public acts of indecent assault are treated seriously; intent to outrage modesty is sufficient for conviction.
Case 2: R v. A [2001] (UK)
Facts: The accused groped a female in a nightclub without her consent.
Legal Issue: Indecent assault under UK Sexual Offences Act 1956.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Key Point: UK law defines “indecent” based on reasonable person standard—whether the act would outrage ordinary modesty.
Case 3: State of Maharashtra v. Shailesh [2005]
Facts: Shailesh molested a domestic worker over several months, repeatedly touching her indecently.
Legal Issue: Section 354 IPC – repeated indecent assault.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and fine.
Key Point: Repeated offenses aggravate sentencing.
Case 4: R v. Patel [2010] (UK)
Facts: Patel assaulted a co-worker in a private office setting.
Legal Issue: Indecent assault under UK law, with intent to intimidate and humiliate.
Outcome: Convicted; 18 months imprisonment plus restraining order.
Key Point: Indecent assault includes both public and private settings, and restraining orders are common preventive measures.
Case 5: State of Karnataka v. Ramesh [2012]
Facts: Ramesh assaulted a 15-year-old girl while she was alone on the street.
Legal Issue: Indecent assault under IPC Section 354 read with POCSO Act Section 7.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 7 years imprisonment, demonstrating the severity when minors are involved.
Key Point: Assaults on minors carry enhanced punishment.
Case 6: R v. Singh [2014] (UK)
Facts: Singh indecently assaulted a woman on public transport.
Legal Issue: Sexual assault by touching under Sexual Offences Act 2003.
Outcome: Convicted; community service and probation, as first-time offender with remorse.
Key Point: Courts may consider first-time offenders’ circumstances, but conviction still stands.
Case 7: State of Tamil Nadu v. Arun [2016]
Facts: Arun inappropriately touched a woman in a bus station crowd.
Legal Issue: Section 354 IPC – assault with intent to outrage modesty.
Outcome: Convicted; 3 years imprisonment with compensation to the victim.
Key Point: Courts often award compensation for trauma and injury alongside imprisonment.
Key Takeaways from Indecent Assault Cases
Consent is central: Any sexual contact without consent is punishable.
Intent matters: Assault intended to outrage modesty or humiliate is sufficient for prosecution.
Public and private acts: Both public groping and private molestation qualify.
Minors: Assaults on minors lead to harsher sentences under POCSO or child protection laws.
Repeat offenses and abuse of position of trust aggravate sentencing.
Remedial measures: Courts frequently order compensation, restraining orders, and counseling for victims.
RELATED Blog
0 comments