Workplace Harassment, Discrimination, And Unsafe Labor Practices
1. Workplace Harassment
Workplace harassment refers to unwelcome conduct in the workplace that creates a hostile, intimidating, or offensive work environment. It can be sexual, verbal, psychological, or physical, and is often a violation of employment law.
Key elements: Unwelcome behavior, impact on employee’s work environment, and intent or effect of creating hostility.
Case Laws:
a) Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (1986, USA)
What happened: Mechelle Vinson sued her employer and supervisor for sexual harassment, claiming repeated unwanted sexual advances.
Legal violations: Violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (prohibiting sex discrimination in the workplace).
Outcome: The Supreme Court recognized hostile work environment sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII.
Significance: Established that sexual harassment doesn’t require tangible economic harm to be actionable; the hostile environment itself is illegal.
b) Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. (1993, USA)
What happened: Teresa Harris alleged that her supervisor created a hostile work environment through offensive sexual remarks and behavior.
Legal violations: Sexual harassment under Title VII.
Outcome: Supreme Court clarified the “hostile work environment” standard, emphasizing that harassment need not cause psychological injury—intimidation or offense is sufficient.
Significance: Strengthened protections against harassment, emphasizing employer accountability.
c) EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2001, USA)
What happened: Female employees alleged that Wal-Mart allowed systemic sexual harassment by supervisors.
Legal violations: Title VII violations for workplace harassment and gender discrimination.
Outcome: Wal-Mart settled, agreeing to compensate employees and implement stricter anti-harassment policies.
Significance: Demonstrated that large corporations can be held liable for systemic harassment if they fail to enforce protective policies.
2. Workplace Discrimination
Workplace discrimination occurs when employees are treated unfavorably based on race, gender, age, disability, religion, or other protected characteristics.
Forms: Hiring/firing bias, unequal pay, promotion denial, or differential treatment.
Case Laws:
d) Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971, USA)
What happened: African-American employees challenged Duke Power Company for requiring high school diplomas and aptitude tests for promotions, which disproportionately excluded minority employees.
Legal violations: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (disparate impact discrimination).
Outcome: Supreme Court ruled in favor of employees, establishing the disparate impact theory, where neutral policies disproportionately affecting protected groups are illegal.
Significance: Set a precedent for recognizing indirect or systemic discrimination.
e) Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989, USA)
What happened: Ann Hopkins sued her employer for denying partnership because of gender stereotyping—she was considered “too aggressive” for a female.
Legal violations: Sex discrimination under Title VII.
Outcome: Supreme Court ruled that gender stereotyping is actionable discrimination.
Significance: Expanded understanding of workplace discrimination to include stereotypes and subjective bias.
f) EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. (2015, USA)
What happened: A Muslim woman was denied employment for wearing a headscarf.
Legal violations: Religious discrimination under Title VII.
Outcome: Supreme Court held that an employer can’t make hiring decisions based on religious practices, even if the employee did not explicitly request accommodation.
Significance: Reinforced that employers must proactively avoid religious discrimination.
3. Unsafe Labor Practices
Unsafe labor practices involve failing to provide safe working conditions, exposing employees to hazards, or violating labor regulations.
Relevant laws: Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), labor codes, and workers’ compensation laws.
Case Laws:
g) Occupational Safety & Health Administration v. BP (Texas City Refinery Explosion, 2005, USA)
What happened: BP was cited for multiple safety violations after an explosion at its refinery killed 15 workers.
Legal violations: OSHA safety standards violations.
Outcome: BP paid over $50 million in fines and settlements.
Significance: Highlighted corporate liability for unsafe labor practices and the importance of rigorous safety protocols.
h) Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932, UK – foundational for workplace safety)
What happened: While not strictly a labor case, it set a precedent for employer duty of care.
Legal principle: Employers owe a duty of care to employees to prevent foreseeable harm.
Significance: Forms the legal basis for workplace safety obligations worldwide.
i) Rana Plaza Collapse (2013, Bangladesh)
What happened: Over 1,100 garment workers died when a factory building collapsed due to structural faults.
Legal violations: Unsafe labor practices, disregard for building codes, and employer negligence.
Outcome: Several factory owners and officials were prosecuted; reforms in global supply chains and labor safety standards followed.
Significance: Highlighted global labor safety issues and corporate accountability in international supply chains.
Key Takeaways
Harassment, discrimination, and unsafe practices often overlap and can lead to legal liability.
Legal frameworks (Title VII, OSHA, labor codes) protect employees but rely on enforcement and proactive compliance.
Landmark cases like Meritor, Griggs, and Rana Plaza demonstrate the consequences of corporate neglect or intentional misconduct.
Global relevance: Workplace protection isn’t just local; multinational accountability is increasingly enforced.
RELATED Blog
comments