Impact Of Taliban Governance On Women’S Criminal Law Rights
1. Ban on Women’s Education (Case: Ban on Secondary and Higher Education)
Context: In March 2022, the Taliban’s Ministry of Education announced the indefinite closure of secondary and higher education institutions to women. This decision was presented as based on the Taliban's interpretation of Islamic law, which they argued prohibited women from pursuing education beyond a certain age or level.
Morality Policing: The closure of schools for women is considered part of the broader morality policing effort, where the Taliban seeks to "protect" what they see as moral and religious boundaries. Under their interpretation of Sharia law, women are expected to stay within traditional roles and are prohibited from seeking education or work in many public sectors.
Legal Debate: The international community has heavily criticized the Taliban’s actions. From a legal perspective, there is a clash between the Taliban’s interpretation of Islamic law and international human rights norms. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) both guarantee the right to education (Article 26 of the UDHR), but the Taliban’s policies are justified as being rooted in their version of Sharia law. This has raised debates about the universality of human rights versus cultural and religious relativism.
2. Dress Code Enforcement (Case: Mandate on Women’s Hijab)
Context: In May 2022, the Taliban issued a decree that all women in Afghanistan must wear the full-body covering known as the niqab (or burqa), and it was explicitly mentioned that any woman seen in public without this attire would be subject to punishment. This order also required women to wear the niqab while traveling long distances and restricts women's freedom of movement without a male guardian.
Morality Policing: This is one of the clearest examples of the Taliban’s morality policing efforts. Their enforcement of a strict dress code is viewed as an essential part of their ideological stance, reflecting their interpretation of Islamic modesty. Women who violate this dress code face potential arrests, fines, or worse.
Legal Debate: From a human rights perspective, the Taliban’s dress code can be seen as a violation of women’s autonomy and freedom of expression. While religious attire is protected in some jurisdictions (as part of religious freedom), the strict enforcement of such a policy, particularly when it curtails women's mobility and choices, raises concerns about the suppression of women’s rights. In Afghanistan, the moral policing around dress is controversial because it is implemented through a coercive framework, contradicting international legal protections against forced dress codes and the free expression of identity (Article 19 and 21 of the ICCPR).
3. Enforcement of Gender Segregation (Case: Gender Segregation in Public Places)
Context: One of the first orders issued by the Taliban after their takeover in 2021 was the re-imposition of strict gender segregation in workplaces, universities, and other public spaces. The Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice has been tasked with enforcing this segregation, which includes separate entrances and seating areas for men and women in public spaces.
Morality Policing: Gender segregation is part of the Taliban’s larger plan to regulate behavior based on their interpretation of Sharia law. Their policies restrict women’s access to public spaces, workplaces, and education, effectively forcing women back into private spaces, primarily homes. Public interaction is strictly limited, and women are often punished for defying this regulation.
Legal Debate: Gender segregation is a contentious issue in international law, as it touches on fundamental rights to equality, freedom of movement, and participation in public life. While some argue that such policies are in line with cultural or religious practices, international human rights law (including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women – CEDAW) condemns segregation as a form of gender-based discrimination. In Afghanistan, these policies are justified on religious grounds, but they clash with global standards of equality before the law and the right to non-discriminatory treatment.
4. Public Execution and Amputation (Case: Public Punishments in Herat)
Context: In 2022, reports surfaced that the Taliban carried out public executions and amputations in the city of Herat. These punishments, according to the Taliban, were based on their interpretation of Islamic law (Hudud punishments), which includes the amputation of hands for theft and execution for crimes like adultery.
Morality Policing: The Taliban’s use of public executions and corporal punishment is a severe manifestation of their version of morality policing. These actions are designed to publicly enforce compliance with the Taliban’s moral codes and serve as a deterrent to those who might defy their rules. Public executions have been carried out in stadiums and other public spaces, sometimes with no trial or due process, raising serious concerns about extrajudicial killings.
Legal Debate: The Taliban's use of corporal punishment and public executions is a clear violation of international human rights law, particularly the prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment (Article 5 of the UDHR). While the Taliban justifies these actions under Sharia law, their use as public spectacles contradicts international standards of justice and due process, as outlined in the ICCPR and other human rights frameworks. The issue of fair trials and the right to a defense are also central to these debates.
5. Suppression of Media and Public Expression (Case: Media Censorship and Arrests)
Context: Since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan, they have imposed strict controls on the media. Journalists, particularly women, have faced arrests and harassment for reporting freely. In particular, the Taliban has targeted independent news outlets that criticize their rule, censoring media content and detaining journalists.
Morality Policing: The suppression of media is a form of morality policing because it seeks to control public discourse and the flow of information. Journalists are often coerced into self-censorship, and those who refuse to comply with Taliban regulations face threats, imprisonment, and even death. The Taliban has also targeted artists and performers, banning music, television shows, and social media activity that does not align with their interpretation of Islamic values.
Legal Debate: The right to free expression is enshrined in international human rights law (Article 19 of the ICCPR). The Taliban’s crackdown on journalists and the media is a clear violation of these principles. Critics argue that this is part of a broader attempt to silence opposition and maintain total control over Afghanistan’s political and social landscape, undermining democratic principles and free speech.
Conclusion: Broader Legal and Ethical Debates
The cases mentioned above illustrate the breadth and severity of the Taliban’s morality policing. At the core of these actions is a conflict between the Taliban's strict interpretation of Sharia law and international human rights standards. On one side, the Taliban argues that their policies are rooted in religious and cultural practices, while on the other side, the international community views these actions as clear violations of fundamental human rights, including the rights to education, freedom of expression, gender equality, and protection from cruel and degrading treatment.
Summary of Key Legal Debates:
Religious vs. Secular Law: Is it permissible for a government to impose laws that are based on a particular religious interpretation, especially when these laws infringe upon universally recognized human rights?
Cultural Relativism vs. Universal Human Rights: To what extent can cultural and religious traditions justify practices that conflict with the rights enshrined in international legal frameworks?
Women’s Rights: How can international human rights law protect women’s rights in societies where traditional cultural and religious practices are enforced by the state?
State Sovereignty vs. International Law: What role should the international community play in intervening when a state imposes practices that violate fundamental human rights?
The future of Afghanistan's legal and moral landscape remains uncertain, as the Taliban continue to assert their control and enforce their version of morality and law across the country. The international community remains engaged in legal, diplomatic, and humanitarian efforts to address these challenges.
RELATED Blog
0 comments