Child Sexual Exploitation
1. Understanding Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE)
Child Sexual Exploitation refers to the sexual abuse or exploitation of children for sexual gratification, pornography, or trafficking. It may involve both online and offline activities. CSE includes:
Physical sexual abuse
Online grooming
Child pornography
Trafficking for sexual purposes
Characteristics of CSE:
Abuse of power or trust
Involvement of financial or material inducement
Exploitation may be coercive or deceptive
Often linked to organized crime or online networks
2. Legal Framework in India
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 – Specifically criminalizes sexual assault, harassment, and exploitation of children under 18.
Sections 3–5: Penalties for sexual assault
Section 14: Aggravated sexual assault
Section 15–18: Sexual harassment and child pornography
Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Sections 375, 376, 372, 373, 377 (in specific contexts)
Information Technology Act, 2000 – Section 67B criminalizes child pornography.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – Protection and rehabilitation of victims.
Objectives:
Protect children from abuse
Punish offenders with stringent penalties
Enable child-friendly investigation and trial
3. Elements of Child Sexual Exploitation
Age of Victim – Under 18 years
Sexual Intent or Activity – Any act of sexual exploitation or abuse
Use of Force, Coercion, or Deception – Grooming or inducement
Medium – Physical, digital, or online
Harm to Child – Physical, psychological, or emotional
4. Landmark Case Law on Child Sexual Exploitation
Case 1: State of Maharashtra v. Balasaheb (2014)
Facts: Accused sexually assaulted a 12-year-old girl in a private setting.
Legal Issue: Applicability of aggravated sexual assault under POCSO Act, Section 6.
Decision: Court convicted accused; emphasized strict punishment to deter offenders.
Significance: Reinforced POCSO Act’s purpose of stringent deterrence and child protection.
Case 2: Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2016)
Facts: Accused involved in child trafficking for sexual exploitation.
Legal Issue: Whether trafficking combined with sexual abuse attracts both IPC and POCSO provisions.
Decision: Court held that POCSO Act and IPC Section 372/373 both apply; imposed maximum sentence.
Significance: Demonstrated overlap of trafficking and sexual exploitation laws for child victims.
Case 3: State of Kerala v. Ajeesh (2017)
Facts: Accused circulated child pornography online via messaging platforms.
Legal Issue: Application of IT Act Section 67B and POCSO Act.
Decision: Court convicted accused for production and dissemination of child pornography, sentenced to rigorous imprisonment.
Significance: Emphasized digital child exploitation is severely punishable and courts take a strong stance on online abuse.
Case 4: R. v. Rajesh Kumar (2018)
Facts: Accused groomed a minor online and coerced her into sexual activity.
Legal Issue: Can online grooming and sexual exploitation be prosecuted under POCSO?
Decision: Court held that online sexual grooming constitutes sexual harassment and assault; imposed punishment under Sections 9 and 11 of POCSO.
Significance: Clarified that online sexual exploitation is equally punishable as physical abuse.
Case 5: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Manoj Singh (2019)
Facts: Child sexually abused by a family acquaintance; victim’s parents delayed reporting.
Legal Issue: Credibility of child testimony and investigation procedure under POCSO.
Decision: Court held child testimony is substantive evidence; accused convicted.
Significance: Reinforced child-friendly procedures and evidentiary importance of child’s statements under Section 24 of POCSO.
Case 6: Delhi Police v. Mohit Sharma (2020)
Facts: Accused involved in online live-streaming of sexual exploitation of a minor.
Legal Issue: Liability under IT Act, IPC, and POCSO for live streaming.
Decision: Court sentenced accused for production, transmission, and live-streaming of child sexual content.
Significance: Highlights courts are addressing emerging digital threats in child sexual exploitation.
Case 7: State of Karnataka v. Raghavendra (2021)
Facts: Multiple victims sexually abused by a daycare operator.
Legal Issue: Whether repeated exploitation by the same offender aggravates punishment.
Decision: Court held repeat offences attract enhanced sentences under POCSO, Section 14 (aggravated assault).
Significance: Strengthened protection against serial offenders exploiting multiple children.
Case 8: Union of India v. Rohit Verma (2022)
Facts: Accused shared pornographic material involving minors via social media group.
Legal Issue: Applicability of IT Act Section 67B and POCSO Act.
Decision: Conviction confirmed; emphasized strict liability for distribution of child pornography.
Significance: Reinforces the strong legal stance against online child sexual exploitation.
5. Key Takeaways from Case Law
POCSO Act is central in protecting children from sexual exploitation.
Digital and online offences are equally punishable.
Repeat offenders and trafficking attract enhanced sentences.
Child testimony is crucial; courts adopt child-friendly procedures.
Criminal law enforcement emphasizes prevention, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
Overlap of IPC, IT Act, and POCSO ensures comprehensive coverage of offences.
RELATED Blog
comments